1900 Twenty Lib. GTG Grade Revealed

It's an MS-64. I thought it was conservatively graded. In hand it looks gem to my eyes. Thanks to all who graded it MS64+ and above!
I love US gold, but it hasn't been an area of focus for me....Playing around with the idea lately though. I really wanted a decent Twenty Lib. because they are such awesome coins, and I love the reverse design in particular. What do you guys think of this 1900? GTG!
2
Comments
MS65.
Yesterday's MS-64. Today's MS-65.
I haven’t cheated (even though it is tempting) but I’m thinking 64+.
65
USAF (Ret) 1974 - 1994 - The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. Remembering RickO, a brother in arms.
64
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
A nice coin but I think the dings on the chin, check, nose and spot in the hair keep it at 63+ but short of 64.
Nice 64. Edited to add: I like it! And 1900 really appeals to me as a date.
Instagram
MS64
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Eldo! You’re a proof guy- go for the proof $20’s- they are stunning!
What a coin! Such a beautiful design....Yeah, I'd have to sell half my collection!
I looked at two $20 Libs. in MS64 from Legend with a big spread in the next grade years ago that they thought were high end for grade, and they probably got the upward bump finally into 65 holders.
64
Dave
65.
64
Nice.
I'd go 64+.
Coinlearner, Ahrensdad, Nolawyer, RG, coinlieutenant, Yorkshireman, lordmarcovan, Soldi, masscrew, JimTyler, Relaxn, jclovescoins
Now listen boy, I'm tryin' to teach you sumthin' . . . . that ain't no optical illusion, it only looks like an optical illusion.
My mind reader refuses to charge me....
I think on a regrade it would 64+. I’d say probably CAC as well. Here’s my 63 CAC for comparison.
I just can't see that 1904 as a 63. It is very extremely clean. I see that a few of the obverse stars aren't struck up well. Does it have luster issues? Based on the TruViews, it looks considerably undergraded to me.
Coinlearner, Ahrensdad, Nolawyer, RG, coinlieutenant, Yorkshireman, lordmarcovan, Soldi, masscrew, JimTyler, Relaxn, jclovescoins
Now listen boy, I'm tryin' to teach you sumthin' . . . . that ain't no optical illusion, it only looks like an optical illusion.
My mind reader refuses to charge me....
TurtleCat, that’s a beauty! Your 63 is nicer than my 64.
MY GOLD TYPE SET https://pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/complete-type-sets/gold-type-set-12-piece-circulation-strikes-1839-1933/publishedset/321940
It has good luster but I think for the date the luster isn’t booming as much as it should. It is remarkably clean from hits, though.
Late to the game...I would have guessed 65.... so a tad high from actual grade. Nice coin. Cheers, RickO