Question on a new purchase.

I just bought this coin for my set and would like comments on the grade. I'm not crazy about GTG but would like any observations any of you have. It does have a CAC sticker and is in an PCGS old green holder also. It has very nice luster that doesn't show in the pics. Thanks in advance. Gary I will reveal the grade given later.
Have a good day, Gary
5
Comments
I like it, now you need no other opinions.
Looks like light rub on the feathers, so I’ll say 58. Admittedly I’m not experienced at telling light wear from strike weakness on these, so looking forward to what those with better trained eyes have to say.
Nothing is as expensive as free money.
Nice coin!
Obverse has a few contact marks, the reverse is better.
MS-63
64
64, maybe even 65. I don't see anything too distracting.
I think it's a very attractive example. Well struck, good luster, nice soft color, and other than some marks in the right obverse field, really quite clean and free of contact marks and abrasions.
I don't see any wear or circulation, so I'm going to say 64
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
65
64.
I also see the slightest wear on the eagle's breast so I'll go AU58.
I’ll take your word it has good luster and say 65. If it is as milky as the photo looks it is a 64 which is how I grade the photo, nice split thumb
11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set
58
33-s - typical San Fran weak strike, beautiful clean fields - but CAC - so yeah, MS65,
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
typical San Fran weak strike
Hmm, looks pretty well struck to me....which is actually typical for the 33S and 34S walkers.
Tough to judge grade from the photos....the luster in the right obverse field is critical, and I can't tell if it's broken or intact. Also the haze over the eagles neck feathers may or may not be obscuring wear (this area almost never has a strike issue).
So, it's either a heckuva 58, but more likely a 64.
I like it. Seems like a pleasing coin.
64
Dave
Thanks for the comments so far. Here are a couple of my scans. Of course with scans the luster don't show. The other was sellers pics.

I was going to guess 63, but after the second pictures, I will say 64.... Cheers, RickO
66
65
Wow! I love the luster!
MS 66
Love the areas above "Half Dollar " and under "E pluribus Unim".
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.A nice 58 that is probably graded as a 62.
65
Mr_Spud
OP knows something we don’t so just in case. Details cleaned 😊
🎶 shout shout, let it all out 🎶
Thanks for all the opinions. I wanted to get some opinions on it because I thought I might crack it out and send it in again for a higher grade. I know it's an old green holder with a sticker. What do you think I should do? Here it is.
It looks like a really nice 62, anyway. The pictures I've seen so far don't tell me one way or the other whether you should try for a higher grade. CAC didn't think "63 all day" when they saw it, and I have no basis for argument. If you want to have it regraded, I use reconsideration rather than cracking it out.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution