Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

2021 Type 2 missing edge reed

derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 9, 2021 5:44PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Is this common to all of them?

Those receiving the coin please report any that have all the reeds.

Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

Comments

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    Is this common to all of them?

    Those receiving the coin please report any that have all the reeds.

    Yes. It was an anti-counterfeiting feature.

    https://www.coinworld.com/news/precious-metals/american-eagle-obverses-receive-updates-for-2021

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    d9lowed9lowe Posts: 312 ✭✭✭✭

    Yeah, security feature

  • Options
    PppPpp Posts: 591 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bought a few today and the dealer pointed out the missing reed under the date, he said it was part of the new security measures being taken.

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 9, 2021 5:55PM

    Guess we'll be seeing it on all future proofs as well.

    While CoinWorld claims the missing reed will also be a feature of the Type 2 AGE, mint images of this coin do not show a missing reed. > @JBK said:

    That will sure scare away the countrtfeiters. :#

    Can't you just file down a reed to replicate or approximate that feature?

    A filled in (doubled) reed would have been harder to cooy, or alternating sections like some foreign coins have.

    I would prefer a single gold reed on the ASEs as a security feature.

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,504 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm not sure how it is more secure.

    will they all be at the same o'clock?

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,785 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I just got 2 in the mail today from APMEX and they are missing a reed in the same place. I had not heard anything about this until I read this post.

    GrandAm :)
  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 17,483 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 9, 2021 6:48PM

    That will sure scare away the countrtfeiters. :#

    Can't you just file down a reed to replicate or approximate that feature?

    A filled in (doubled) reed would have been harder to copy (alter), or alternating sections like some foreign coins have.

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:
    I'm not sure how it is more secure.

    will they all be at the same o'clock?

    I have seen images of three different locations, all somewhere under the date. Guess we'll be seeing labels with "missing reed position A" etc.

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wonder how much it changes the weight? lol

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    jessewvujessewvu Posts: 5,079 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So, if there was an "error" where a genuine coin did not have the missing reed, would it be considered counterfeit??

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    jessewvujessewvu Posts: 5,079 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's a conspiracy!

  • Options
    MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    Now I am curious.

    If you do not mind me asking, where is this image located?

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:
    That will sure scare away the countrtfeiters. :#

    Can't you just file down a reed to replicate or approximate that feature?

    A filled in (doubled) reed would have been harder to cooy, or alternating sections like some foreign coins have.

    I don't think any of those are terribly challenging for a counterfeit. If you are casting, makes no difference. If you are minting, you just need a different collar. Big deal.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    drawing not a picture

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How funny!

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @derryb said:
    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    drawing not a picture

    wrong, again. photo from their image library.

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MetroD said:

    @derryb said:
    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    Now I am curious.

    If you do not mind me asking, where is this image located?

    Mint's image library

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,504 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @derryb said:
    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    drawing not a picture

    wrong, again. photo from their image library.

    Looks like the fractionals don’t have it.

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    wrong, again. photo from their image library.

    Thats where I got my images for "Proof #1", "Uncirculated #1", and "Bullion".

    Which image did you use?

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Type 2 half ounce design.

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    Type 2 half ounce design.

    As @MsMorrisine said earlier, it appears that the missing reed is just on the one ounce AGE, not the fractionals. :)

  • Options
    blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,632 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 9, 2021 6:58PM

    Looks like the mints way of suckering you out of .00000000000001ozt of gutter metal. Sad part is you will probably be willing to pay more. lol

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 17,483 ✭✭✭✭✭

    An ounce is an ounce whichever way it is struck. If they filed it off after striking then they would be light, but they are struck that way so the weight is the same. ;)

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 9, 2021 11:53PM

    @derryb said:

    @MetroD said:

    @derryb said:
    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    Now I am curious.

    If you do not mind me asking, where is this image located?

    Mint's image library

    @derryb said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @derryb said:
    Yet this mint image from their website shows full reeds on the Type 2:

    drawing not a picture

    wrong, again. photo from their image library.

    What an AH

    "Image" doesn't mean photo. That sure looks looks an artist rendering. Yes it is an"image". It is not, I believe, a photo. If it is, it is highly processed.

    What is the angle that shows the bottom reeds and the top reeds?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 13,058 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jessewvu said:
    It's a conspiracy!

    It's just another way for the Gov't to take a little something away and still charge you for it.

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • Options
    rip_frip_f Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭

    They purposely only included this feature on the 1 ounce coins and not the fractionals.
    They will remove the reed on the 1/10th ounce coins in the designer set so they qualify as unique.

    This would be a simple way to solve their mintage limit dilemma.

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    What an AH

    "Image" durant mean photo. That sure looks looks an artist rendering. Yes it is an"image". It is not, I believe, a photo. If it is, it is highly processed.

    Back at ya AH. Mint image library refers to it as "high resolution." Most people can tell the difference between a drawing and a photo. A few can only claim they are able to do so.

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    What an AH

    "Image" durant mean photo. That sure looks looks an artist rendering. Yes it is an"image". It is not, I believe, a photo. If it is, it is highly processed.

    Back at ya AH. Mint image library refers to it as "high resolution." Most people can tell the difference between a drawing and a photo. A few can only claim they are able to do so.

    The Mint almost never uses photos. High resolution is the bit count. Tell me what gold eagle has a surface that llooks like that.

    You could have disagree without failing "wrong, again.. "

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Find me a half dollar that looks like this "high resolution image"

    https://www.usmint.gov/news/image-library/john-f-kennedy-half-dollar#2021

    Since you will never relent, I contacted their image licensing division for clarification. In the meantime, I will fatten up the crow.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 10, 2021 12:10AM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    Tell me what gold eagle has a surface that llooks like that.

    The one in this mint photo, or is it also a drawing?

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. - Bastiat

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:

    @jmlanzaf said:


    Tell me what gold eagle has a surface that llooks like that.

    The one in this mint photo, or is it also a drawing?

    Also an artist rendition or very heavily processed. Does that coin surface look proof to you?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rip_f said:
    They purposely only included this feature on the 1 ounce coins and not the fractionals.
    They will remove the reed on the 1/10th ounce coins in the designer set so they qualify as unique.

    This would be a simple way to solve their mintage limit dilemma.

    Interesting idea.

    Currently, the images on the 'product page' for 21XK show both T1 and T2 coins as fully reeded.

    Have you 'heard/seen' something definitive, or is this just a theory?

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It seems to me that eliminating a reed is fairly simple...and not difficult to counterfeit. Perhaps I am missing something, but with the counterfeits available today, this minor modification will not stop them. Must be more to it than the obvious. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,560 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    It seems to me that eliminating a reed is fairly simple...and not difficult to counterfeit. Perhaps I am missing something, but with the counterfeits available today, this minor modification will not stop them. Must be more to it than the obvious. Cheers, RickO

    A Coinweek interview with D. Ryder from Q3-19.
    The portion that pertains to future security features starts at 7:25.

    At the time of the interview, the new security features were expected to come in three different levels. The missing reed likely 'falls' into the "overt" category.

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gentlemen, please take deep breaths and count to ten backwards in Base Eight. Let us have peace.

    U.S. Mint images are marketing tools and not historical records. They may or may not represent reality. I once saw an image of a gold-colored Sacagawea Dollar design with a "FIVE DOLLARS" denomination and a W mint mark, and I don't think it ever existed in reality (but I cannot be sure). Not worth starting a war over.

    TD

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    Gentlemen, please take deep breaths and count to ten backwards in Base Eight. Let us have peace.

    U.S. Mint images are marketing tools and not historical records. They may or may not represent reality. I once saw an image of a gold-colored Sacagawea Dollar design with a "FIVE DOLLARS" denomination and a W mint mark, and I don't think it ever existed in reality (but I cannot be sure). Not worth starting a war over.

    TD

    It's really not a war. For me, it wasn't even about the image. It was the somewhat insulting "wrong, again..."

    I'm wrong at least once a day. Everyone should be. If you never make mistakes, you aren't reaching and "a man's reach should always exceed his grasp. " But "wrong, again..." isn't a counterargument or even proof that I was wrong once. It's dismissive and seemed unwarranted based on my very mundane observation.

    I do appreciate you, however.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    cagcrispcagcrisp Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The image on the Mint's website shows the missing reed for the 1 oz. AGE and the 1 oz. ASE...

    The 1 oz. is the ONLY coin that has the missing reed.

    The posted picture above is a 1/2 oz. AGE and NO fractional coins have the missing reed...

    https://www.usmint.gov/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2021-american-eagle-gold-one-ounce-proof-coin-obverse-new-design.jpg

    https://www.usmint.gov/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2021-american-eagle-silver-one-ounce-proof-coin-obverse-new-design.jpg

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Epitaph for my tombstone: "I THOUGHT I WAS WRONG ONCE, BUT I WAS MISTAKEN!"

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    rip_frip_f Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭

    @MetroD said:

    @rip_f said:
    They purposely only included this feature on the 1 ounce coins and not the fractionals.
    They will remove the reed on the 1/10th ounce coins in the designer set so they qualify as unique.

    This would be a simple way to solve their mintage limit dilemma.

    Interesting idea.

    Currently, the images on the 'product page' for 21XK show both T1 and T2 coins as fully reeded.

    Have you 'heard/seen' something definitive, or is this just a theory?

    .
    I was just theorizing – just getting peoples’ imaginative juices flowing and preparing them for the inevitable.

    It would be the kind of marketing strategy/gimmickry that the Mint has come to employ recently to create hype - and manufacture a rarity out of bullion blanks.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rip_f said:

    @MetroD said:

    @rip_f said:
    They purposely only included this feature on the 1 ounce coins and not the fractionals.
    They will remove the reed on the 1/10th ounce coins in the designer set so they qualify as unique.

    This would be a simple way to solve their mintage limit dilemma.

    Interesting idea.

    Currently, the images on the 'product page' for 21XK show both T1 and T2 coins as fully reeded.

    Have you 'heard/seen' something definitive, or is this just a theory?

    .
    I was just theorizing – just getting peoples’ imaginative juices flowing and preparing them for the inevitable.

    It would be the kind of marketing strategy/gimmickry that the Mint has come to employ recently to create hype - and manufacture a rarity out of bullion blanks.

    Unfortunately, the Mint just doesn't seem at all concerned that they violated their own mintage limit.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    rip_frip_f Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭

    They wouldn't be violating the mintage limit if the coins in the designer product are minted differently.
    They would be a mintage and a product limit of 5000 each.

    Thus getting around the mintage limit violation.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rip_f said:
    They wouldn't be violating the mintage limit if the coins in the designer product are minted differently.
    They would be a mintage and a product limit of 5000 each.

    Thus getting around the mintage limit violation.

    My point is that they have to care to even try and find a way. And creating new tooling is a lot of effort if you really don't care.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    3stars3stars Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ve been waiting for the two crankiest members to go at it…

    Previous transactions: Wondercoin, goldman86, dmarks, Type2
  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @3stars said:
    I’ve been waiting for the two crankiest members to go at it…

    Lmfao

    I'm nowhere near the top two in crankiness on this forum.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    WQuarterFreddieWQuarterFreddie Posts: 3,184 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @3stars said:
    I’ve been waiting for the two crankiest members to go at it…

    Can't see their posts but some things never change!🤣😂

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @WQuarterFreddie said:

    @3stars said:
    I’ve been waiting for the two crankiest members to go at it…

    Can't see their posts but some things never change!🤣😂

    Your obsession is unbecoming.

    And, admit it, you looked. Or saw it when quoted.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    Jzyskowski1Jzyskowski1 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @derryb said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    What an AH

    "Image" durant mean photo. That sure looks looks an artist rendering. Yes it is an"image". It is not, I believe, a photo. If it is, it is highly processed.

    Back at ya AH. Mint image library refers to it as "high resolution." Most people can tell the difference between a drawing and a photo. A few can only claim they are able to do so.

    The Mint almost never uses photos. High resolution is the bit count. Tell me what gold eagle has a surface that llooks like that.

    You could have disagree without failing "wrong, again.. "

    These 2are not the worst. Not by a long shot

    🎶 shout shout, let it all out 🎶

  • Options
    coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My two arrived today. I took side by side pics and tried to do a reeding shot.
    .
    .
    .
    Glamor shot

    .
    .
    .
    Side by side on the


    .
    .

    .
    .

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file