This coin is being inspected by the Department of the Treasury. I’m awaiting their results, website guy and other hatefulness members. I will post their results
Okay Professor,
You profess to be an educated person so this should be easy for you to understand.
The mark on the obverse of your coin that you keep insisting is an error of some type and happened when the coin was made is clearly a scratch. The scratch on the coin is shiny, if it was done when the coin was made it would have the same color tone or patina as the rest of the coin. It would also indicate it was done in the not so distant past.
@Dewlynn59 said:
This coin is being inspected by the Department of the Treasury. I’m awaiting their results.
And what do you expect them to say? Assuming you ever get it back, I have no idea what they might say as I would not expect them to be an expert on any of this (PMD or error).
It is painfully obvious to many experienced people here (including some actual error experts) what the issue is.
Iftevamzarockin which coin the 1959 penny or the 1975 dime. As for JBK, I was told about they’re backed up due to the COVID-19. But that they have received the coin. As to if I get it back I think I will. If not it wasn’t ment for me to have. And I apologize for the political comment
@Dewlynn59 said:
I was told about they’re backed up due to the COVID-19. But that they have received the coin. As to if I get it back I think I will. If not it wasn’t ment for me to have.
OK, so let's make sure I understand this....
You have cancelled your PCGS membership but they still have your coin for grading, and the Department of the Treasury is inspecting the coin.
As for my 2 million dollar 1919 penny Pcgs metallic composition analysis test came back and it was 95.6%CU,3.3%SN, and 1.2% ZN. The standard for this coin is, 95.5% CU, 3%SN, and 1.5%ZN. The Royal mint wants to perform more testing?
I taught for many years in the CUNY system (Bronx Community & Baruch Colleges), my title was Professor, but I always referred to myself as an instructor.
You, Sir, with your clear denial of facts presented by experts, stubborn ignorance, and false credibility, show yourself to be just as flawed as that parking-lot reject you claim is an error.
I highly doubt your claimed (retired) professional status. Unless you were PoliSci, then your delusional comments are understandable.
Instructor huh? I don’t give a flying F…?, about your opinion. I’m just following what is out trying to make a few bucks like everyone on this forum. And it’s not cool to be disrespectful boy.
@Dewlynn59 said:
As for my 2 million dollar 1919 penny Pcgs metallic composition analysis test came back and it was 95.6%CU,3.3%SN, and 1.2% ZN. The standard for this coin is, 95.5% CU, 3%SN, and 1.5%ZN. The Royal mint wants to perform more testing?
Yes I am sure the Royal Mint is interested in testing a 102 year old coin for quality control purposes, especially since they don't even make solid bronze coins anymore.
Have you ever heard of tolerances? What was the leeway allowed in 1919?
I think its the Royal Hospital that needs to do more testing.
@KindaNewish said:
I highly doubt your claimed (retired) professional status.
I noticed when he first announced his profession he actually said "ex" instead of "retired" professor. I thought that was odd.
Unless you were PoliSci, then your delusional comments are understandable.
I am not sure whether to be offended or agree with that comment.
I am not as good with the memes as some here. I am surprised no one has posted a picture of that famous shipwrecked professor. Either that or Jerry Lewis as the Nutty Professor.
@Dewlynn59 said:
I have an 1919 uk penny made of 95% copper. This is the only example known. See pcgs verification #39837766. I'm seeking $2 million us dollars.
@Dewlynn59 said:
Instructor huh? I don’t give a flying F…?, about your opinion. I’m just following what is out trying to make a few bucks like everyone on this forum. And it’s not cool to be disrespectful boy.
.
.
Remember when the OP "cherry picked a 1933" UK penny, and the photo of the reverse was, conveniently, too out of focus to see the date?
What a coincidence that the current dime photos are also conveniently out of focus - except that it is still apparent that the date is 1973. Not that anyone would mistake it for a proof, in any case.
Looks like someone is trying to pull something, but is just really, really bad at it.
Comments
OP. On the other thread you said you canceled your PCGS membership. Why?
Just curious. That was your best chance to prove us all wrong.
@Dewlynn59
"Being a ex-University Professor"
The other gentleman was my undergraduate student.
Can ya teach my goldfish to stay in school?
Pictures are too big to see anything. 😉
"I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
Why are you an ex-professor?
Enquiring minds want to know...
I’m retired
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
I will adjust pictures if to big thanks. First person with logic and reason. If only to ask such.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Why I canceled Pcgs. Service?
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Yes. that was the question, professor.
Die caps can have leftover debris in them when striking.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
How about the description “Struck- through error coin”).
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
This coin is being inspected by the Department of the Treasury. I’m awaiting their results, website guy and other hatefulness members. I will post their results
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Not everything is rare. Not everything rare is valuable.
Maybe there’s someone here that wants to buy it but I’m not selling thanks, tincup.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
I know one thing I’m getting a lot of comments for an alleged coin found in a freaking parking lot This tells me that there’s something to this coin.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
No comments on the 1969 s. Lincoln penny DDO?
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
No, I never ran from anything. The coin is a struck through error coin. Mule kept it moving.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
And how about this worn 1975 proof
or
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Okay Professor,
You profess to be an educated person so this should be easy for you to understand.
The mark on the obverse of your coin that you keep insisting is an error of some type and happened when the coin was made is clearly a scratch. The scratch on the coin is shiny, if it was done when the coin was made it would have the same color tone or patina as the rest of the coin. It would also indicate it was done in the not so distant past.
And what do you expect them to say? Assuming you ever get it back, I have no idea what they might say as I would not expect them to be an expert on any of this (PMD or error).
It is painfully obvious to many experienced people here (including some actual error experts) what the issue is.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Outstanding photo!
We can tell that error coin is worth 2 million!
Iftevamzarockin which coin the 1959 penny or the 1975 dime. As for JBK, I was told about they’re backed up due to the COVID-19. But that they have received the coin. As to if I get it back I think I will. If not it wasn’t ment for me to have. And I apologize for the political comment
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
I don’t know what the treasury is going to say? But whatever they say I will inform the community.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
OK, so let's make sure I understand this....
You have cancelled your PCGS membership but they still have your coin for grading, and the Department of the Treasury is inspecting the coin.
OK, perfesser, that clarifies things.
Blurry washing machine coin? It's blurry so I'm not sure. It looks to be a dime?
As for my 2 million dollar 1919 penny Pcgs metallic composition analysis test came back and it was 95.6%CU,3.3%SN, and 1.2% ZN. The standard for this coin is, 95.5% CU, 3%SN, and 1.5%ZN. The Royal mint wants to perform more testing?
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
I taught for many years in the CUNY system (Bronx Community & Baruch Colleges), my title was Professor, but I always referred to myself as an instructor.
You, Sir, with your clear denial of facts presented by experts, stubborn ignorance, and false credibility, show yourself to be just as flawed as that parking-lot reject you claim is an error.
I highly doubt your claimed (retired) professional status. Unless you were PoliSci, then your delusional comments are understandable.
Instructor huh? I don’t give a flying F…?, about your opinion. I’m just following what is out trying to make a few bucks like everyone on this forum. And it’s not cool to be disrespectful boy.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Kindanewish
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
🤐
"I’m just following what is out trying to make a few bucks like everyone on this forum."
Spoken like a true professor....... no wonder I got bad grades.
Yes I am sure the Royal Mint is interested in testing a 102 year old coin for quality control purposes, especially since they don't even make solid bronze coins anymore.
Have you ever heard of tolerances? What was the leeway allowed in 1919?
I think its the Royal Hospital that needs to do more testing.
I noticed when he first announced his profession he actually said "ex" instead of "retired" professor. I thought that was odd.
I am not as good with the memes as some here. I am surprised no one has posted a picture of that famous shipwrecked professor. Either that or Jerry Lewis as the Nutty Professor.
Why not both?
I agree
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Yes
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Show (art), & Tell (Explain)
Come on now... give me a close up, come on.
There not so bad was it.
Not a proof.
Different coins. For those who have eyes let them see.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
BU Proof.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Yet again, looks like someone is trying to pull something, but is really bad at it. To be fair, he did actually find a dime dated 1975, this time.
Those are two different things, technically.
But it all makes sense in that poster's bizarro world.
(BU Proof)
I'm thinking TOO much proof...........
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"