1959 d. Lincoln penny predamaged mint error. Die cap debris ejected from obverse.
Dewlynn59
Posts: 106 ✭
Dewlynn59
Posts: 106 ✭
Comments
Will this penny make money dispite the crazy mule clash?
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
I'm not seeing a crazy mule clash.
I'm seeing a damaged cent.
Was this damaged coin found in a parking lot?
Damage by a mule is not worth any premium.
How about this One?
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
The mintage for the 1959 D cent is 1,279,760,000
They are worth 1 cent
Which 1969 Lincoln cents has more value? Top row. The s or the d
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
If the d is worth 1c. How much more value will be had if it’s missing the initial LG on reverse?
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
The 1969 d. Is missing the initials on the reverse? Would this give it a preimium of more than 1 c.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
1969 d., Lincoln penny with no initials on reverse would be considered a new variety of this penny.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
It also has a floating roof reverse compared to s.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
We need some die markers to be sure of this one…
TurtleCat Gold Dollars
The transitional 1988 p. Is also a new vaitiety above.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
The 1988 p also has a error in the initials on the reverse
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
We cannot see any of the details you are referring to, and from the pictures, they look like ordinary cents. And not in good condition.... Cheers, RickO
Once graded then we chat.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
All spare change
BHNC #203
You must report the results. Agreed?
What description on the tag/label,
are you looking for ?
for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
Were is the mule. Did he run away or did you say the “mule died” ?? 😂
Wow, based on his previous threads, this member has found some real" interesting" stuff and is very creative with his interpretation. I feel bad that I wasted time trying to offer helpful information previously. No sense in continuing to play This game.
Best of luck moving forward
I quit.
Pete
I zoomed in on the cents
None are special in any way
No, we aren’t interested in buying them
I am curious what you mean by "mule die"?
Collector, occasional seller
Just check out the OP's second thread on the forum. It's a real head scratcher. They did put their money where their mouth was and they paid to have metallurgical analysis done before going ahead and slabbing a normal Brifish penny worth about 25 cents. But they still insist it is something special.
I predict this exercise will end the same way.
I think the OP is trying to sell us a dead mule but the translation software mixed things up a bit.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
A mule die clash occurs when two dies that should not have paired together to strike coins are accidentally or intentionally paired and subsequently are clashed together without a planchet in the collar.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Look at the d leading up to the date. Marks of planchet in the collar. Live
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
User1 is that you?
Did you ever get a scope?
when the planchet is in the collar, there are no marks.
What are you saying this die was clashed with?
Collector, occasional seller
A Clash cap. With old material stuck in the clash cap.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
It’s my humble opinion that the clash cap had debris from old stuck inside , during the strike. And released after the coin was ejected.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
The gray head gentleman is Horton hears a who. The other gentleman was my undergraduate student.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Yes I do have a scope. And to that question? Why ask such a thing? User1.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Under the scope there isn’t any left over debris visible. Apparently it was freed when the coin was ejected into the ben and or washed out at the mint. I don’t walk around looking for coins in any parking lot. Being a ex-University Professor, coin community.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Delusional, Horton hears another who. I’m not like president 45. I try applying logic with reasoning. OP dead mule.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Humor is vanity nothing new under the sun. Let me get something straight. Have I joined a community that’s blessed with professional graders. But if they’re delusional in thinking that this coin is just damaged without considering the debris elements in the work place at the mint. And it could in fact be an mint error strike through error made with old debris in the clash die cap, that damaged this coin, community.
This 1933 uk. King George v. Pattern coin.
Could you explain what a clash cap is?
Now it's a clash cap, before it was a mule die.
Did the coin suddenly change from one error to the other?
You keep making up numismatic terms that mean nothing.
Maybe you can make up another numismatic term for this coin.
Maybe it's an indented collar on a partial split brockage planchet from a distorted hub.
The debris was ejected from a mule.
Now we're getting closer.
I think it's debris ejected from the back end of a mule.
@Dewlynn59 "I try applying logic with reasoning."
What is your asking price? Maybe someone here is interested in buying it..... ? .....
"DAMAGED"
I guess
BHNC #203
T***p University?
[oops, sorry, no political comments.]
BHNC #203