Okay.....at or nt?

coinsarefun

I've been going through many items in my collection and have several older 8 hole cardboard Wayte Raymond. I just put large silver bullion coins in there as I went along through the years.
.
Among a few that are toning these 2 were very noticeably toned. Is this considered AT now. A few were somewhat toned..
when I put them in years ago. But, not not super like these 2 are.
.
.
.

.
.
.

jmlanzaf

It is AT and NT and MA.

bsshog40

A lot of coins have been toned over the years in cardboards and albums. Some look good, some don't. I think these look good to me, at least MA.

panexpoguy

NT in terms of market acceptability.

Smudge

I would consider them NT, not sure what our host would say. Wayne Raymond toning used to be a thing.

MsMorrisine

not going to get into a "what is NT, what is AT" debate with anyone

NT

U1chicago

I'd say market acceptable. And I find both to be eye appealing.
Although there were many made, I haven't run into a ton of nicely toned examples. My favorite is pictured below.

pursuitofliberty

I think both of those would be considered NT ... MA to the nit pickers ... with the first one more NT looking.

Ha! See what I did.

Seriously though, that is what some years in and album will do to silver coins, and based on the looks, both of those look like they would straight grade.

coinsarefun

@U1chicago said:
I'd say market acceptable. And I find both to be eye appealing.
Although there were many made, I haven't run into a ton of nicely toned examples. My favorite is pictured below.

Yowsers!!! sure is a pretty one. Its true Ive never seen but a handful toned.
Yours is supper nice, I think I have a few more.....one in purple tones and one I cant remember more slight rainbow.

U1chicago

@coinsarefun said:

@U1chicago said:
I'd say market acceptable. And I find both to be eye appealing.
Although there were many made, I haven't run into a ton of nicely toned examples. My favorite is pictured below.

Yowsers!!! sure is a pretty one. Its true Ive never seen but a handful toned.
Yours is supper nice, I think I have a few more.....one in purple tones and one I cant remember more slight rainbow.

Thanks! I've owned a few over the years but this is the best (and the only one I've kept).

SkyMan

MA

Wahoo554

NT

LanceNewmanOCC

@coinsarefun said:

do you use paint.net?

sellitstore

OK, now what would you call them if the O/P didn't tell you their history?

johnny9434

It looks good to me. MA

coinsarefun

I want to thank everyone again for your comments.....
.
.

Aercus

Market acceptable and pretty to boot!

JJM

NT

ricko

I would call those coins NT.... based on their history as related by @coinsarefun ... Cheers, RickO

coinsarefun

@sellitstore said:
OK, now what would you call them if the O/P didn't tell you they're history?

.
.
.
I look at these as silver eagles, Yes eagles are. .999 silver and these are . 833 fine silver,
But it's close enough and many are stored similarly in albums and whatnot. Some tone, a good majority do not tone. Some tone fugly,
I don't know if its the same with these as the eagles but some years just do not tone.
So I would say without the back story I would lean towards natural. The only thing that bothers me is they toned very similar
.
.
.
.
.

Coin Finder

NT, these are restrikes, yes?

crazyhounddog

Looks alright to me. NT all the way.