So, I bought a real coin, commemorative actually...want to give a grade opinion? ** update** new pic

coinsarefun

Yep, surprise....surprise I strayed from tokens, medals....etc.... and bought a 1936 Cleveland Commem. half dollar.
Old Green PCI non the less. Give me your thoughts and grade guesses please.
.
.
.


.
.
.
Well, today is a new day and better day for taking pictures of coins. Below is a very accurate image.....well as best as I can do.
It is more purplish as one member here said. I added a little more light to brighten the coin but it took away some of its luster
.
..............and the grade is MS63. I think I will leave it in its current tomb for a weeee bit longer.
.
.
.

ricko

I am not good on tarnished coins Stef, but I will hazard a guess at MS65. Cheers, RickO

USSID17

64?

WinLoseWin

Some may not be fond of the toning, but I kind of like it.

I'm guessing it's more attractive in-person than in the photos. Especially if it is more of a red or purple than just brown.

As for grade, I will say MS-65 on the holder.

djm

Considering it is in an old PCI holder I am going to say they graded it MS63.

MsMorrisine

4

USSID17

I thought about saying cleaned but I didn't want to insult you.

To me, it looked a little bit like this recent thread:

https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1055825/guess-the-grade-columbian-expo-grade-revealed#latest

PurpleEcho

@djm said:
Considering it is in an old PCI holder I am going to say they graded it MS63.

Were the old PCI's usually under graded? I was going to guess it's a legit 65, but PCI said 66.

Mr_Spud

65

keets

pictures aren't really good enough to judge the surface condition, but I'll say PCGS MS64+ and PCI MS66. overall, it has a pleasant appearance.

djm

@PurpleEcho said:

@djm said:
Considering it is in an old PCI holder I am going to say they graded it MS63.

Were the old PCI's usually under graded? I was going to guess it's a legit 65, but PCI said 66.

Yes the old PCI coins were graded very conservatively. If you remember Insider2 he was one of the graders back in the mid 90's.

pursuitofliberty

That's a nice looking Cleveland Stephanie! I like the rim color and suspect it may have deepened since it was graded.

I'll say PCI called it a 64, and I think it can cross in to a 64, 64+ or maybe a 65 holder ... if you decide to go that way.

Catbert

@djm said:

@PurpleEcho said:

@djm said:
Considering it is in an old PCI holder I am going to say they graded it MS63.

Were the old PCI's usually under graded? I was going to guess it's a legit 65, but PCI said 66.

Yes the old PCI coins were graded very conservatively. If you remember Insider2 he was one of the graders back in the mid 90's.

You’re not helping me forget.

64 is my guess.

CalifornianKing

MS65. It would be higher if it had a better strike!

Lakesammman

I'm liking it - MS65 guess here.

KindaNewish

Get it out of that tarnish machine ASAP!

jesbroken

MS65, I do not think it has a poor strike. In fact I think it as good as the 3 CoinFacts that are 68, 67+ and 68. Cleveland never had major hair lines and the print strike may be a little subdued by the toning. Nice pickup, welcome to the semi real coin world, Steph.
Jim

seanq

Old PCI was stingy with the gem grades, so I will say 64. I would also bet that coin was white or nearly so when they holdered it, the rust / purple toning on the reverse is a very typical pattern on silver coins in those slabs.

Sean Reynolds

U1chicago

MS 64 on the holder....an attractive example!

Goldbully

65

ColonelJessup

Steph,
that's a really vibrant Cleveland and a market bargain with that look. I've seen grungy 67's with underlying lustre I've liked less. Even though ICGFP* I'm calling it conservative real world 64++
Not bad for a rookie
Rick

• ICGFP = I Can't Grade From Pictures

coinsarefun

Thank you everyone for your thoughts and opinions. Grade and better image in original post on top.

keets

nice, but still no pictures which can help us accurately grade the coin, hence, all the high guesses. by the way, any thread that can temp the Colonel to post deserves to ride at the top for at least a few days!!!

Smudge

65.

logger7

PCI green holders were pretty accurate; less so the gold holder incarnation.

ColonelJessup

@keets said:
nice, but still no pictures which can help us accurately grade the coin, hence, all the high guesses. by the way, any thread that can temp the Colonel to post deserves to ride at the top for at least a few days!!!

Thanks Al. Let's see if you think that in a week or two.

There are members betting the opposite, and one of them is a formerly very dear friend. This quite-extended last hiatus came subsequent to my unannounced return from my earlier announced hiatus followed by another suspension (they didn't tell why, I didn't ask) banning followed by at least 50 weeks of compounded self-righteous indignation and loathsome self-pity. I was consoled by Andy's Cabernet and NJ's legalization of tomorrow's holiday treat.

And I'm glad to be here. Let's see if the mods think that in a week or two

I've been following Steph without comment for years. She sure lives up to her profile name

Along

64

Catbert

Stef. Will this be a new trend for you?

MsMorrisine

Not having experience with PCI toning, I wonder if the current toning will get too dark if left in.

coinsarefun

@Catbert said:
Stef. Will this be a new trend for you?

.
.
Probably not as I will be selling a bunch of stuff soon. I want to retire and get into old gold

keets

Not having experience with PCI toning, I wonder if the current toning will get too dark if left in.

having been in the holder for 20+ years it has probably stopped toning and is now stable. also, I don't think those holders toned the coins, though I'm not certain on that last point.

coinsarefun

@keets said:
Not having experience with PCI toning, I wonder if the current toning will get too dark if left in.

having been in the holder for 20+ years it has probably stopped toning and is now stable. also, I don't think those holders toned the coins, though I'm not certain on that last point.

.
.
.
I cannot attest to this one as I did not buy it before or earlier on but, I will say that the toning color and pattern is typical of green label pci toning. It may not have been white because they used to say 100% white on the slab.

metalmeister

I always liked old PCI holders with the mintage on them. I even talked to PCGS and NGC about this.
I'll go 64 due to the old PCI holder. I've had many up grades come out of those.

keets

It may not have been white because they used to say 100% white on the slab.

so I went and looked at some archived threads and I believe that these holders did in fact lend to the toning process. I had thought it was the next incarnation, but from the pictures in those threads it's both types.

dcarr

MS66.

JimTyler

Collectible holder leave it

coinkat

vintage PCI holder and based solely on the font, I suspect it was grade 22-25 years ago. I suspect PCI graded the coin 63 then. I like the coin as a 65 and it has the look- congrats.

I think I would leave this as is... in the PCI holder unless the grade is 62 or lower.

Congrats... wonderful addition and your post speaks volumes about looking at the coin.

coinsarefun

Thanks again everyone. For those that missed the reveal grade it is a MS63 and I'll just let it sit around for a while and look at it from time to time

MJD

I’ve always liked the Cleveland commemorative. I just picked up this lightly toned MS-65 CAC for my commemorative registry set.

Cougar1978

64