I've seen plenty of lightly circulated High Reliefs but few in jewelry. I figured that if it was an Omega, someone here would want it anyway. Even a beat up genuine jewelry piece is worth significantly more than melt but not this one as a non-Omega fake. Not my thing, but I found it interesting, anyway.
Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
The rough surfaces look more like jewelry wear to me, but hard to tell. They claim it tested 90% gold. Same as the Mexican 50 Pesos that our alleged counterfeiter is supposed to have used, according to a very popular thread from a couple of years ago.
Didn't sell too far above melt ($2688 vs about $2100 melt), if you consider the mount and BP, but it's one ugly coin (condition-wise) or imitation thereof. It's no longer the attractive piece of jewelry that it once was and is near the end of it's useful life, even as a jewelry piece.
Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
Comments
Real removed, fake inserted. Two prongs broken off on reverse.
bob![:) :)](https://forums.collectors.com/resources/emoji/smile.png)
It's counterfeit, but that's no Omega
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
I've seen plenty of lightly circulated High Reliefs but few in jewelry. I figured that if it was an Omega, someone here would want it anyway. Even a beat up genuine jewelry piece is worth significantly more than melt but not this one as a non-Omega fake. Not my thing, but I found it interesting, anyway.
I don't know. I'm seeing something in that claw.
Why do you think it's not an Omega? I can't tell from this photo.
Looks cast because of all the little voids. (pockmarks)
![](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/ms/oggygt28ws7k.jpg)
The Omega was a very high quality struck coin.
My Saint Set
In addition to that, look at how unevenly weak the eagle’s neck and lower tail feathers are.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
The rough surfaces look more like jewelry wear to me, but hard to tell. They claim it tested 90% gold. Same as the Mexican 50 Pesos that our alleged counterfeiter is supposed to have used, according to a very popular thread from a couple of years ago.
Didn't sell too far above melt ($2688 vs about $2100 melt), if you consider the mount and BP, but it's one ugly coin (condition-wise) or imitation thereof. It's no longer the attractive piece of jewelry that it once was and is near the end of it's useful life, even as a jewelry piece.
Melt is more like 1787 right now........
I was including the mount and guessed at weight/value plus the coin.
Just judging from the pictures, I would pass... worn, if authentic, and I am not sure it is...Cheers, RickO
That is not an attractive mount, rather crude, I could agree with the aforementioned on the "coin".
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...