if you had to GTG from a coinfacts image...
savoyspecial
Posts: 7,298 ✭✭✭✭
What would your guess be? no cheating
www.brunkauctions.com
4
savoyspecial
Posts: 7,298 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
It would be wrong.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
If it's straight graded, I'd guess MS62BN
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Damaged, details grade of some kind.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
61
AU with the mother of all filled dies.
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
Au
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
58
61 my guess as well. That poor die though
High AU.
AU58 here. Cool striking...
My YouTube Channel
I can't see how the red bit in the middle wouldn't be called environmental damage, so I'd say Unc details. A straight grade would be no better than 62. I don't see wear, but eye appeal is not good.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
UNC details ED/tooling/damage
coinfacts or trueview?
You guys are good, especially Mr. Feld. It's a 62 but with that strike and that discolored blight I couldn't pay Unc money.
www.brunkauctions.com
I was trying to cheat and didn't see it in CF
?
Recolored?
Looks like it was struck through GREASE!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
62, struck through
But I don't like the look
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
I dunno, looks MS with issues to me. The great reverse strike doesn't match the appearance of the central, lower obverse. It's looks like an enormously bad grease-filled die, but if so it's a borderline error coin (to my way of thinking). In any case, as a type guy, this isn't a coin that would tempt me in the slightest.
62 filled die.
I would have guessed 63BN, filled die.
64+bn n-? 7/7
neat find @savoyspecial
Low end does not float my boat.
I would guess (and it would be a wild guess) Unc details.
MS63BN.
I wouldn't attempt to guess the grade based on that pic.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Why not? It looks like a pretty good image.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I studied the image and I was split between a high end AU or a low end MS. Based on that pic I would have to flip a coin. I guess that's why it's called "guess the grade".
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Strange looking obverse...I would guess grease filled die... Nice reverse.... Cheers, RickO
I wonder if that’s not a defective planchet given the discoloration.
I’m fine with an MS grade, but that’s right on the border of what should probably be described as an error coin.
Curious....You said this on another thread about TrueViews...
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1046457/behold-the-new-grading-scale-for-saints#latest
My Saint Set
To me, there’s a big difference between saying an image “looks pretty good” and based on it, guessing a grade, vs. concluding from an image that a coin has been under-graded (or over-graded).
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
.
Ummm....Pass
My Saint Set
Ummmm, I don’t know what that was supposed to mean.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.