I love a good MS64 Morgan!

Meltdown

For my money, MS54 is the sweet spot grade for sharp looking Morgans.
They're relatively cheap and normally found with much less distracting chatter than a 63...

And to quote my good buddy Topstuff - Feel free to show off your MS64 "Cowboy Dollars" in here
.

Coinscratch

That is a sweet looking MS54
Looks 65 to me.

coinbuf

Very attractive dollar, this is the only 64 I have that I have a photo of at this time.

pointfivezero

Totally agree. MS64 seems to be a transitional grade. Their condition seems to run the gamut but there are often some sleepers available at a reasonable price. I have an offer in with my LCS for seven MS64's right now, including this one:

Downtown1974

Great 64s fellas! Here’s a couple of mine.

DelawareDoons

64 is the minimum grade I can really accept these days with a few exceptions. This is not an exception.

Meltdown

DelawareDoons

mothra454

Not just a 64, but a 64PQsemiPL!

ricko

I agree... MS64 is an excellent grade for Morgans.... and a reasonable price range for the most part. Cheers, RickO

RAB

Agree 100%. Broad range of quality within any grade...but I’ve seen plenty of Morgans graded 64 that look world’s away from what you often see in 63 holders. This was my ideal grade for better dates when I was putting my set together.

Here’s one of the few I still own. It was purchased raw over 30 years ago (as Ch. Unc. from Stack’s in NYC) and was one of my very first submissions to PCGS when I got back into the hobby...

bearcave

Meltdown

bearcave

White?

Meltdown

@bearcave said:
White?

Right?

bearcave

Nice lookin Morgan! I have seen others that toned in the holder where it said "White".

Jimnight

That's a nice one!

jesbroken

@Meltdown That is a great strike. Reverse looks at least 65. Beautiful coin.
Jim

pointfivezero

@jesbroken said:
@Meltdown That is a great strike. Reverse looks at least 65. Beautiful coin.
Jim

Totally agree. Great toning and a very strong strike for a New Orleans Morgan.

SeattleSlammer

I can dig it.

airplanenut

Maybe it's their size, but I think the mid-range uncirculated Morgans have about the biggest step quality between grades as you'll find. Below 63, it really takes a lot of chatter to earn the grade, and I usually don't like them. 63s can be hit or miss. At 64, I agree with you, a lot of the heavy chatter is gone. Then you get to 65 and the coin is all of a sudden pretty clean. 66 earns you a cheek that may be pristine. There's a different jump in quality for each grade to the next, but certainly for the small increase in cost, 64s offer a lot.

I'm too lazy to confirm which of my Morgans are 64s (the pictures are what are handy), so while I have others, here's a quick one. I bought it for the doily, but the quality didn't hurt.

spacehayduke

ike126

TennesseeDave

blitzdude

@CoinscratchFever said:
That is a sweet looking MS54
Looks 65 to me.

Yep ditto, looks 65 to me. The OP's not any in the replies. Congrats!

SkyMan

Very nice coins everyone!

I'm seeing a lot of older holders here.

AlanSki

AlanSki

braddick

@Jimnight said:
That's a nice one!

lkeigwin

I've had this one for years. Is it better than 64? Dunno. But not worth the cost to upgrade.
Lance.

pointfivezero

@lkeigwin said:
I've had this one for years. Is it better than 64? Dunno. But not worth the cost to upgrade.
Lance.

Hard to determine the luster from the pictures but the fields and devices are certainly very clean. Would it be worth the cost of submission if it came back a 66? It is cleaner than many 66's I've seen. Nice Morgan.

morgansforever

Was in a NGC 64 holder, cracked out because the holder was really scuffed up and impossible to image.
Pretty dang clean for a 4.

Meltdown

Nice Morgans everyone!

asheland

With lower prices lately, 65’s are on my radar, but I agree, 64’s can be VERY nice:

Meltdown

This one just made the 64 quality cut for me when I purchased it... a few scuffs here and there with a nearly hidden cut on the eagle breast... It was cheap and I love the vibrant blue edges. Old, small Anacs holder.

mothra454

@bearcave said:
Nice lookin Morgan! I have seen others that toned in the holder where it said "White".

I have a bunch of these as well, all in old green PCI holders. They must have started toning soon after holdering and maybe people complained to PCI so they started adding the % of "white" on the label to absolve themselves when the ugly tarnish appeared

bearcave

DelawareDoons

vplite99

Common date Morgans in MS64 are cheap because they are so common, and they always will be.

Meltdown

@vplite99 said:
Common date Morgans in MS64 are cheap because they are so common, and they always will be.

Thank you captain obvious, you are correct.

Here's my last MS64 Morgan to share.
.

bearcave

i have several 63's, cheaper yet. But 64's look better!

JRocco

Agree with OP

ELVIS1

@JRocco said:
Agree with OP

thats insane....
I'll give all the 64 money and a bag o chips

bennybravo

Wow! Beautiful near and should be GEM coins here for sure. Keep them coming!

david3142

I used to target MS64 for my Morgans as well. Here is one of my favorites in that grade:

bearcave

AlanSki

AlanSki

Meltdown

Holy crap Alan! That is a nice one - somehow I don't think it sells for 64 money.

Kccoin

@vplite99 said:
Common date Morgans in MS64 are cheap because they are so common, and they always will be.

Yes, common is common. But it sure is fun selecting choice "MS64" coins coins for zero premium.

Kccoin