Which Gold Indian would you pick for a toned set?
jwitten
Posts: 5,160 ✭✭✭✭✭
First one has been the one in my toned set for several years. I just got the second back from PCGS. First is AU58, second is AU55. I do not care about the grades in this set, just the color and look. Neither is as vivid as some of the other coins in the set, but hey, some of these have taken years and years to find. The AU58 has slightly more vivid color, but the AU55 is more toned overall.
11
Comments
Second one without a doubt
Latin American Collection
Agreed!
Yep, second.
Definitely Door #2
Fantastic set!
Both are beautiful. I'd lean slightly toward #2, as I think it matches your set a little better.
Dave
Number two!
The second one would fit your set better.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Number 2
Collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
I like the second one much better also. I also think the grades should be switched.
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
Second
Definitely the second!
My YouTube Channel
Second one
The second one for sure
I think we have a consensus.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
it's a toned set...so second one. nice btw
Yes. No. 2. No doubt. Nice set.
No. #2 All day - Great set!
2
2 no question.
Edit, never mind #2 would be a nice upgrade.
I can certainly tolerate the nasty on gold unlike on silver. The AU55 one, no question.
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
Not like you needed any further confirmation but the 55 looks head and shoulders better than the first IMO.
Absolutely #2.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Ok, Ok, yall have convinced me! Lol. Here is the updated set:
2nd one down would be my pick.
Both are nice.
Both are great but the toning contrast of the 2nd coin makes the Indian stand out almost like a cameo. Number 2 for sure.
Pretty cool when the first and last are great, but I really like them all.
I like #2
That's a helluva nice 58 and it fits into your beautiful set like it was meant to be there.
I’m late to the party, but #2.
The images give the nod to door #2 for me. The coin looks more attractively toned/have more eye appeal.
For set uniformity, the second is the choice....I see that you did that....Cheers, RickO
2.
2nd one #2018.
That is a stunning set!
Second to last, top right
I'll just say the first one so that a thread on the internet can't be 100% in agreement on something. If that happened, I think the spacetime continuum would implode.
2 is the one.
The Indian's face lights up and so does the eagle's breast. Both are super nice!, but 2018 is better.
Super nice set, love it!
Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone
2
Wow, what a beautiful toned set!!!! I'm blown-away...
Second nice set!
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/publishedset/209923
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/album/209923
A bit late, but all the way with the deuce.
Yep. 2!
Jbknifeandcoin.com
IG: jb_rarities