Home U.S. Coin Forum

New Acquisition $20 Liberty Gold DE

LeeroybrownLeeroybrown Posts: 462 ✭✭✭✭✭

Just got this peice in the mail today and wanted thoughts from the group on grade, quality, etc.



Comments

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,538 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gold CAC?

  • kazkaz Posts: 9,179 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS60? Looks like a lot of dark gunk from being stored in a European bank vault for 100 years or so.

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS61 nice luster

    Coins & Currency
  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 5,959 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU53 congrats!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,231 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU58 B)

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin, good color but if I would purchase it as a raw coin I would buy as an AU53. Too much wear in the hairlines for MS grade IMHO

  • scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gonna go with AU50 Gold sticker.

  • LeeroybrownLeeroybrown Posts: 462 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A few more pics...


  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,538 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh a GTG. 53.

  • LeeroybrownLeeroybrown Posts: 462 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well... I appreciate the flattering guesses on grade and that helps me to know the quality of the piece... please see the grade below...

  • chesterbchesterb Posts: 961 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good job by all!! :D>:)

  • Wahoo554Wahoo554 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow, I never would’ve thought the VF range. Definitely wouldn’t look out of place in an AU holder.

  • HarlequinHarlequin Posts: 112 ✭✭✭

    Yeah, I would have thought low AU as well

    🇺🇸 Harlequin Numismatic
    harlequinnumismatic@gmail.com

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,231 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I notice that this coin is in an older PCGS slab. In the early years of slabbing the grading services would either slab a coin with a straight grade or they would return your coin raw in a flip which collectors referred to as a "body bag". Once in awhile, if the problem wasn't too severe, they would silently net grade a coin downward and slab it. This coin may have had an issue they felt warranted a silent net grade.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • AlexinPAAlexinPA Posts: 1,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I also am surprised. I thought AU 53 - AU 58.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Would have said 55.

  • CrustyCrusty Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coin looks awesome. Congrats on another sweet piece.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I was going to guess AU53.... surprised at 35.... Gold sticker indicates it could do better. Cheers, RickO

  • LeeroybrownLeeroybrown Posts: 462 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    I notice that this coin is in an older PCGS slab. In the early years of slabbing the grading services would either slab a coin with a straight grade or they would return your coin raw in a flip which collectors referred to as a "body bag". Once in awhile, if the problem wasn't too severe, they would silently net grade a coin downward and slab it. This coin may have had an issue they felt warranted a silent net grade.

    I agree they used to do this to a lot of coins back in the day, however I will tell you there is no way they net graded this coin... it is an absolute beauty and zero problems. They just simply graded it low cause it is frosty original surfaced and a beauty of a circ piece. I also believe the grading standards were diff back then which coulda contributed in some way...

  • jclovescoinsjclovescoins Posts: 1,914 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Don’t know how anyone sees the piece as MS...with that said, AU50-53 would be fair.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm surprised so many people are calling it AU! :*

    @AlexinPA said:
    I also am surprised. I thought AU 53 - AU 58.

  • LeeroybrownLeeroybrown Posts: 462 ✭✭✭✭✭

    With this discussion in mind, I think the point is that quality and eye appeal can def be deceiving even for the trained eye... thoughts on that point?

  • LeeroybrownLeeroybrown Posts: 462 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How bout the other 2 coins??? Any thoughts on those next to the 1853 on grade???

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 13,977 ✭✭✭✭✭

    An interesting piece for sure.
    I like it a lot👌

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • MrbarlintMrbarlint Posts: 37 ✭✭✭

    I like it! Congrats and enjoy!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file