Guess the grade. 1833 Half
CalifornianKing
Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭
CalifornianKing
Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭
CalifornianKing
Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
Your photos really need to be lightened up a bit. My best guess would be AU55.
Yes...please.
And it would be nice to view the proper orientation of the reverse.
Lance.
Definitely hard to tell pictures. but I'll guess conservative at Au53.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
This will be truly a guess for reasons already mentioned...
Fifty Five
As mentioned previously the photo is dark, and I'm going with an AU 53
Sugar magnolia blossoms blooming, heads all empty and I don't care ...
53
Based on those pictures... XF45-AU50.... Pictures are always tough to grade, but those offer even greater challenges. Cheers, RickO
53
53-55. Not too confident in that as it is so dark.
I'll also guess AU-53
Charles III Album
Charles III Portrait Set
Charles IV Album
Charles IV Portrait Set
Spanish Colonial Pillar Set
au 50/53
AU- lacquered?
AU55. Dark toning??
You were all wrong. I personally thought it was XF45, ANZACS called it EF45, NGC disagreed.
The details are better than XF but I agree that it has been cleaned and retoned.
What makes you say that it was cleaned? I personally thought it could be a AU50/53 non-cleaned.
I was thinking XF/AU. Old Anacs white slabs do not cover a guarantee of grade. At least PCGS would have allowed a crossover contingent on a straight grade. "Cross at any numerical grade".
It was the one with yellow lable.
NGC does not allow crossovers on any coins but PCGS; PCGS does, and many would rather have that coins in an Anacs XF45 than NGC details. Possibly Anacs could look at it again and consider it for the reholder as long as nothing was done to the coin in cleaning etc when it was taken out.
You had me with ANZACS.
That is one tasty cookie 😋
From the photos it appears to have a very glossy look. That is something that is usually seen on cleaned coins.
I like it.
AU53
Dave