Guess the grade. 1833 Half

CalifornianKing

Guess the grade. Will post grade/slab once I get enough responses/guesses.

CoinJunkie

Your photos really need to be lightened up a bit. My best guess would be AU55.

lkeigwin

@CoinJunkie said:
Your photos really need to be lightened up a bit. My best guess would be AU55.

Yes...please.

And it would be nice to view the proper orientation of the reverse.
Lance.

privatecoin

Definitely hard to tell pictures. but I'll guess conservative at Au53.

jayPem

This will be truly a guess for reasons already mentioned...
Fifty Five

baddogss

As mentioned previously the photo is dark, and I'm going with an AU 53

NumisOxide

53

ricko

Based on those pictures... XF45-AU50.... Pictures are always tough to grade, but those offer even greater challenges. Cheers, RickO

amwldcoin

53

Smudge

53-55. Not too confident in that as it is so dark.

JohnnyCache

I'll also guess AU-53

johnny9434

au 50/53

Hydrant

AU- lacquered?

Jimnight

AU55. Dark toning??

CalifornianKing

You were all wrong. I personally thought it was XF45, ANZACS called it EF45, NGC disagreed.

291fifth

The details are better than XF but I agree that it has been cleaned and retoned.

CalifornianKing

@291fifth said:
The details are better than XF but I agree that it has been cleaned and retoned.

What makes you say that it was cleaned? I personally thought it could be a AU50/53 non-cleaned.

logger7

I was thinking XF/AU. Old Anacs white slabs do not cover a guarantee of grade. At least PCGS would have allowed a crossover contingent on a straight grade. "Cross at any numerical grade".

CalifornianKing

@logger7 said:
I was thinking XF/AU. Old Anacs white slabs do not cover a guarantee of grade. At least PCGS would have allowed a crossover contingent on a straight grade. "Cross at any numerical grade".

It was the one with yellow lable.

logger7

NGC does not allow crossovers on any coins but PCGS; PCGS does, and many would rather have that coins in an Anacs XF45 than NGC details. Possibly Anacs could look at it again and consider it for the reholder as long as nothing was done to the coin in cleaning etc when it was taken out.

jayPem

You had me with ANZACS.
That is one tasty cookie 😋

291fifth

@CalifornianKing said:

@291fifth said:
The details are better than XF but I agree that it has been cleaned and retoned.

What makes you say that it was cleaned? I personally thought it could be a AU50/53 non-cleaned.

From the photos it appears to have a very glossy look. That is something that is usually seen on cleaned coins.

Hydrant

I like it.

Dave99B

AU53

Dave