Next Widget for a GTG fresh from the Grading Room
SurfinxHI
Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭✭✭
Enjoy this one!
Surf
Dead people tell interesting tales.
7
SurfinxHI
Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭✭✭
SurfinxHI
Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭✭✭
SurfinxHI
Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭✭✭
SurfinxHI
Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭✭✭
Enjoy this one!
Surf
Comments
That booger caps it at 62. Maybe PL but I can never tell from just pics.
I'll be optimistic and guess 63, PL.
MS63. Nice frosted devices, but not enough mirrors and too much luster to be PL, IMO.
63 . with chatter in front of face grade limiting factor.
63
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
I'll go with 63, not quite PL.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
63.
I am at 64. I am guessing the semi PL fields make those marks look worse than they actually are.
Gonna go out on a limb and say it made a 64PL.
Cheek, breast and wings all look awfully clean ... I'm going to say I think that's a 4. Not sure if it pulls the PL, but I think it could
Nice widget
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
63 PL
I would call it 62 and a few years back I would expect a max of 63 from a TPG; but with commercial grading the way it is I am guessing 64
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
MS63PL...
63 DMPL
62+, probably PL. 63 wouldn't surprise me.
63PL
63 PL
I would grade it as a 62.... TPG grade probably 63.... However, it is a CC Morgan, so I like it...
Cheers, RickO
62 PL
64
62 PL in my book — as others have said, would not be surprised to see it in a 63 holder. Way too much chatter to be higher than that.
Nothing is as expensive as free money.
I would not be surprised if it is in an AU holder. I love the look of it but am unable to tell if some of what i can see is rub or bagmarks with this picture.
63+ just short of the PL
62 PL
64 PL
I'm usually not one of the best, when it comes to grading. But even I can see the wonderful frosty appearance. I'll go 63PL
I myself, would love to have such a beauty in my collection.
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.In 64 camp.
64, maybe PL
MS63+PL
bob
I am thinking it could squeak into a MS63PL grade.
Photos imply lots of chatter both in the fields and on the devices. Obverse there are marks on the chin, eyelid, forehead and nose. Reverse scratches to the left and right of the eagle and above 'TRUST'. Nice strike and looks like there is frost on both sides. Can't tell much about the reflectivity but with the frost I suspect that it is there. I'll go 62 PL but could see this in a 63 holder.
K
63 PL WAG!!
63 PL
My YouTube Channel
well....most of you are sort of right,m some more than others.
So, this coin has at least 6 professional opinions now, as it has been graded twice. Seems like a split grade decision to me....
It used to live in an older ATS holder in MS 63....
Now it is in a current PCGS holder at MS 62 PL.
It got opinions 4-6 cuz it has mirrors that are at least 3 inches in reflectivity....not sure why it wasn't designated PL ATS...maybe b/c of price jumps? And now I'm not sure why it didn't get MS 63PL here....maybe b/c of price jumps?
Anyway, good job you forumites!
Should be in an MS63 PL holder rather than 62
Hmmmmm . . . . .I would have thought it would get the "CC Bump" up to 63 . . .
Drunner
I'd buy it up to 63+.
I’m confident that what you describe as “price jumps” had nothing to do with the grading. Countless coins with far greater value and value differences between consecutive grades, have received the benefit of the doubt with respect to grade.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
MS63 possibly PL. would need examine sight seen.
Really nice coin. No widget in my view.