Home U.S. Coin Forum

OK, Copper experts... 1864 Two Cent - Straight piece? Surfaces look normal? Back from our host!

mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 8, 2020 4:12PM in U.S. Coin Forum

OK, I'm not a old copper expert but took a flyer on this piece. Too good to pass up, I think... Actually a little darker than picture shows. Maybe a RB.

Copper experts... 1864 Two Cent - Straight piece? Surfaces look normal and ready for slab?

Comments

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It could be the lighting, but the color does not look natural to me.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 34,737 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    It could be the lighting, but the color does not look natural to me.

    I'm also a little suspicious, especially with what appears to be surface roughness and the streaky obverse. Hard to say in those photos, so I would not claim even 90% certainty, but it looks like it might have been dipped and retoned.

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    It could be the lighting, but the color does not look natural to me.

    I'm also a little suspicious, especially with what appears to be surface roughness and the streaky obverse. Hard to say in those photos, so I would not claim even 90% certainty, but it looks like it might have been dipped and retoned.

    I know it's said that dipping will not work on copper. Toning is fairly even across the entire coin but not sure if the "spotty" toming is what one might suspect. It is lighter than what the coin looks like in hand. Overall I'd say the tone and color might be normal but not sure about evenness of tone.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 15,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have no opinion either way on originality but my natural skepticism toward higher end collectable coins makes me think that if a coin belongs in a slab then it would already be in one. :*

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 34,737 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mark_dak said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    It could be the lighting, but the color does not look natural to me.

    I'm also a little suspicious, especially with what appears to be surface roughness and the streaky obverse. Hard to say in those photos, so I would not claim even 90% certainty, but it looks like it might have been dipped and retoned.

    I know it's said that dipping will not work on copper. Toning is fairly even across the entire coin but not sure if the "spotty" toming is what one might suspect. It is lighter than what the coin looks like in hand. Overall I'd say the tone and color might be normal but not sure about evenness of tone.

    Silver dip won't work the same on copper. There are, however, copper and brass dips. You can also lighten the color with acids like vinegar or lemon juice. The hard part is retoning it. Although time will eventually do that.

    I once had an AU large cent that had been dipped in acid to make it (fake) red. I toned it with a chemical concoction I whipped up in lab. It ended up looking a lot like the photo of that coin. Again, I make no guarantees from the photo, but the color pattern looks suspicious.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,424 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I once got fooled on a Lincoln that has a look and color very much like the one you posted, I'm thinking this has a low chance of getting a straight grade.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The color looks slightly off to me.
    Not horribly so, but it does look "done."

  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it and think it will straight grade.

  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,892 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Color in pictures is rarely correct. I'd love to see this one in hand. It looks very nice but I'd reserve judgment.

    I'd probably send it in for grading but brace for the worst.
    Lance.

  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it and think it will straight grade.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m more concerned about the lighter color areas than I am about the uneven color. And I think the color looks noticeably different from that seen on the linked coin.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,482 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Tough to tell, but my thought is that it was a mint state R&B coin, that someone worked on to make it appear all red again.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 34,737 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mark_dak said:
    Here's one sold at Heritage that has a similar look. Even has a sticker to boot. Just seeing that even but "spotty" toning.

    Not at all the same to my eye. It's not the small scale spottiness. It's the lighter color streaks below the shield and near the date.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,388 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It has to be seen in person and under proper lighting for grading. That said, it is another raw coin that should be in a slab by now. My prediction is that it will get a details grade for cleaning. It will prove to be another "great buy" that wasn't.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Based on the two cent pieces I have seen...and held... I would question this based on the picture. Just looks as if it has been treated/dipped ....Cheers, RickO

  • SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭

    To me, based on what I see on my computer monitor, there is a world of difference between the coin in the OP and the one in the Heritage auction, regarding color.
    There is a small toning dot underneath the A in STATES (and the E in the motto), but the rest of the coloration looks suspicious.
    What type of holder was the (raw) coin in when it was purchased? I'm very curious.

    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    IMO: "Market acceptable."

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Sonorandesertrat said:
    To me, based on what I see on my computer monitor, there is a world of difference between the coin in the OP and the one in the Heritage auction, regarding color.
    There is a small toning dot underneath the A in STATES (and the E in the motto), but the rest of the coloration looks suspicious.
    What type of holder was the (raw) coin in when it was purchased? I'm very curious.

    Bought it several years ago in an Air-tite

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mark_dak said:
    Here's one sold at Heritage that has a similar look. Even has a sticker to boot. Just seeing that even but "spotty" toning.

    Not at all the same to my eye. It's not the small scale spottiness. It's the lighter color streaks below the shield and near the date.

    Gathering up some for submission. Think I might take a shot on this one. Consensus is I will not be happy with the result. Waiting on my local dealer to submit. I cant get beat too bad on it. Dont have much invested

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mark_dak said:
    Here's one sold at Heritage that has a similar look. Even has a sticker to boot. Just seeing that even but "spotty" toning.

    Not at all the same to my eye. It's not the small scale spottiness. It's the lighter color streaks below the shield and near the date.

    Right, could be a sign of trouble

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    It has to be seen in person and under proper lighting for grading. That said, it is another raw coin that should be in a slab by now. My prediction is that it will get a details grade for cleaning. It will prove to be another "great buy" that wasn't.

    Point well taken

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mark_dak said:
    Here's one sold at Heritage that has a similar look. Even has a sticker to boot. Just seeing that even but "spotty" toning.

    Not at all the same to my eye. It's not the small scale spottiness. It's the lighter color streaks below the shield and near the date.

    @mark_dak said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mark_dak said:
    Here's one sold at Heritage that has a similar look. Even has a sticker to boot. Just seeing that even but "spotty" toning.

    Not at all the same to my eye. It's not the small scale spottiness. It's the lighter color streaks below the shield and near the date.

    Right, could be a sign of trouble

    These streaks are caused by a non-homogeneous alloy mixture that reacts differently to the environment. Coins with extreme, well-defined patterns are called "woodies."

    The fact is that this piece was probably cleaned at one time and has a bunch of planchet flaws on its obverse should not keep it from being straight graded. Of course this is just an opinion based on the posted images.

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mark_dak said:
    Here's one sold at Heritage that has a similar look. Even has a sticker to boot. Just seeing that even but "spotty" toning.

    Not at all the same to my eye. It's not the small scale spottiness. It's the lighter color streaks below the shield and near the date.

    @mark_dak said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mark_dak said:
    Here's one sold at Heritage that has a similar look. Even has a sticker to boot. Just seeing that even but "spotty" toning.

    Not at all the same to my eye. It's not the small scale spottiness. It's the lighter color streaks below the shield and near the date.

    Right, could be a sign of trouble

    These streaks are caused by a non-homogeneous alloy mixture that reacts differently to the environment. Coins with extreme, well-defined patterns are called "woodies."

    The fact is that this piece was probably cleaned at one time and has a bunch of planchet flaws on its obverse should not keep it from being straight graded. Of course this is just an opinion based on the posted images.

    Thanks Insider,

    All the surface features are exaggerated in the pictures. Color is somewhat darker maybe RB. Details are as outstanding and sharp as they appear. Had to drop some items off today to my box. Picked this one up to take some better pictures tonight if I can get some to come out

  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,501 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it very much. Nice coin and I hope it straight grades.

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From the Pictures and description the Reverse looks gradable but the Obverse does not.

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The color looks odd, but it may be due to lighting. The roughness patches near the date and wreath are areas I'd focus on if the coin was in hand...

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lousy Samsung Galaxy camera! Color just slightly darker and a bit more reddish tone than this. Original post shows better detail. Based on all the comments, it may or may not grade straight or hopefully I got my first "Woodie".

    Thank you for all the input - makes the forum a worthwhile use of time.


  • CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭

    Surface looks messed with in my opinion.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mark_dak said:
    Lousy Samsung Galaxy camera! Color just slightly darker and a bit more reddish tone than this. Original post shows better detail. Based on all the comments, it may or may not grade straight or hopefully I got my first "Woodie".

    Thank you for all the input - makes the forum a worthwhile use of time.


    I’m confused. Previously, you posted “Color is somewhat darker maybe RB.” I took that to mean you thought there was a decent chance the coin would be designated as “RD”. In these new pictures, “RD” would look to be out of the question.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Red and Brown

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭✭✭

    pumpkin orange/pink -> cleaned

    hard to tell from pictures (not just yours, but most) what you have

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 34,737 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mark_dak said:
    LCS finally got this out to our host and back after all the COVID issues. I sent in a few - this one ended up coming back with a straight grade. My usual mea culpa for lousy pictures...

    Nice!

    It actually looks like a completely different coin in the holder photos. Maybe you were just too close with the camera? The color looks completely even in the slabbed photos and not at all uneven like the original photos.

    Congratulations!

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 8, 2020 8:51PM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mark_dak said:
    LCS finally got this out to our host and back after all the COVID issues. I sent in a few - this one ended up coming back with a straight grade. My usual mea culpa for lousy pictures...

    Nice!

    It actually looks like a completely different coin in the holder photos. Maybe you were just too close with the camera? The color looks completely even in the slabbed photos and not at all uneven like the original photos.

    Congratulations!

    ???

    Edited to explain my question marks: The post I quoted was somehow showing before the prior post with the photos...

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I stay away from red copper. Look but don't buy.

  • Pnies20Pnies20 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Awesome you got in a 65RB holder. Good eye.

    BHNC #248 … 130 and counting.

  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,289 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good job on the successful submittal!

    Here's your True-View

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    now slice that pie thin so there's enough to around.

  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice! Congrats on the grade!

  • mark_dakmark_dak Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinJP said:
    Nice! Congrats on the grade!

    Thanks all, pretty happy with most of what I had sent in. Especially happy with this one because I generally don't buy old copper and my knowledge is limited. Just couldn't pass this one up at the price it was offered.

    Mark

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭✭✭

    nice coin

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,019 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nothing not to like about that coin and the grade assigned. Congrats!

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice- the original set of pictures looked much flatter and led me to think recolored. Glad it was just the photos

    Collector, occasional seller

  • calgolddivercalgolddiver Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭✭✭

    congratulations.

    Top 25 Type Set 1792 to present

    Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set

    successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), Downtown1974, Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)

  • toyz4geotoyz4geo Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's nice when you take a chance on something and it doesn't come back to haunt you. Great looking piece.

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congratulations!

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:
    Very nice- the original set of pictures looked much flatter and led me to think recolored. Glad it was just the photos

    That's what I thought too.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file