Recent grading results: Have we turned the corner?
ModCrewman
Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭✭✭
Over the past couple of weeks I received grades on a few economy submissions. I have been pretty open about my frustration with what I have perceived to be very tight grading by PCGS over the past 24 months. What I have experienced with my submissions represented, in my opinion, a variance from the standards under which I had been submitting coins since 2011. I paid PCGS thousands of dollars (via grading fees) over 7 years to train my eye for grading and designation of 1950-70 cameo proof/SMS coins which is my nearly exclusive collecting area.
I had considered these submissions to be nearly "last straw" submissions of the "best of the best" I've purchased over the last 6 months. I've held back literally hundreds of coins from being submitted to PCGS over the past year while I believed their standards had become extremely tight.
Particularly related to the last submission of 23 coins for which I received grades most recently, for the first time in nearly 2 years, I felt the grades were in line with what they were during the majority of my previous 7 years of collecting. I surely can't say on the basis of only 2 submissions that they have returned to prior grading standards, but I am hopeful that we may be turning the corner. I pray that is the case; the last few years haven't been much fun with repeated disappointing results on submission after submission.
Without further ado here are the results from my most recent submission (Bolded are those that improved my set.):
- 37180102 83377 1956 1C, CAM PR67+CA
- 37180103 83383 1958 1C, CAM PR67CA - Tied my best
- 37180104 84182 1950 5C, CAM PR67CA
- 37180105 84187 1955 5C, CAM PR66CA
- 37180106 84191 1959 5C, CAM PR67CA - Tied my best
- 37180107 84193 1961 5C, CAM PR68CA
- 37180108 95239 1964 10C, DCAM PR68DC - Tied my best
- 37180109 507430 1956 25C Rev Die Gouge FS-701, CAM PR66CA
- 37180110 85989 1957 25C, CAM PR67CA
- 37180111 85990 1958 25C, CAM PR67CA
- 37180112 5993 1961 25C PR67
- 37180113 85995 1963 25C, CAM PR67CA
- 37180114 95996 1964 25C, DCAM PR69DC
- 37180115 6696 1955 50C PR66
- 37180116 6686 1956 50C Type 1 PR67+
- 37180117 6686 1956 50C Type 1 PR67
- 37180118 86697 1956 50C Type 2, CAM PR69CA
- 37180119 86699 1958 50C, CAM PR67CA
- 37180120 6700 1959 50C PR67
- 37180121 6700 1959 50C PR68
- 37180122 86700 1959 50C, CAM PR67CA
- 37180123 86703 1962 50C, CAM PR67CA
- 37180124 96800 1964 50C, DCAM PR67DC - Tied my best
These are the TrueViews of the ones that I was most pleased with:
1956 1C PR67+ CAM
1950 5C PR67 CAM
1956 25C Reverse Die Gouge PR66 CAM
1964 25C PR69 DCAM
1956 50C Type 1 PR67+
1956 50C Type 2 PR69 CAM
1959 50C PR67 CAM
1964 50C PR67 DCAM
Comments
Neat!
Collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
Beautiful proofs. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
That sampling is awesome!
Some very nice looing pieces there!!!
Congrats on your grades.
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
Of all the posts about grading consistency and standards over the last few years, your threads have stuck with me the most by far.
Why so many of your submissions did not warrant any CAM designations had me so frustratingly confused.
Congrats!
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
Congrats on finally making a 1959 half dollar in Cameo. Very attractive coin.
@ModCrewman I experienced the same thing as you describe almost 2-3 years ago. I decided not to waste anymore money after I had to free coins I spent +/- $1000.00 in grading fees. That submission was under graded 10 points straight through across the board. I have not submitted anything since and sold all the coins I cracked out at the grades they were.
I had a dozen Barber Half's in that submission come back graded VG8 that were all solid F12-15 coins! I had never seen a graded VG8 Barber Half with just the bottom of BER missing in Liberty before that submission!
nice set. thanks
ModCrewman,
Congrats on the submission. I still have my submission in for grading with no results back. In our PM conversation you sounded discouraged with the process but your results given me hope.
Trueviews of all the coins would be nice to see so we can see what is not getting CAM or DCAM designations.
Here is my Washington Quarter Variety Registry Set
This is my Washington Quarter Proof Variety Registry Set
One would think that PCGS would give submitters incentive to spend $ with them, especially in a tough market like today. Grading has certainly been strict since the new regime took over about 24 months ago. I think gradeflation is a thing of the past.
Very nice proof coins. Congrats!
100% Positive BST transactions
Not sure about grading standards on such coins but those coins in the pics are stunning!
@ModCrewman....Those are very nice coins... Congratulations on a great submission. As to your comments... the first issue is your use of the word 'standards'.... there are none. That is why there is gradeflation or tightening in the grading process....Standards, by definition, do not change. For example... an inch or foot or meter is a standard of measure. Volts and watts are a standard of measure. Troy or avoirdupois ounces or pounds are units of measure.
Consistent and recognized. There are no grading 'standards' only generally accepted levels of opinions. Good luck. Cheers, RickO
@ricko said: THIS:
"@ModCrewman....Those are very nice coins... Congratulations on a great submission. As to your comments... the first issue is your use of the word 'standards'.... there are none. That is why there is gradeflation or tightening in the grading process....Standards, by definition, do not change. For example... an inch or foot or meter is a standard of measure. Volts and watts are a standard of measure. Troy or avoirdupois ounces or pounds are units of measure.
Consistent and recognized. There are no grading 'standards' only generally accepted levels of opinions."
What Ricko also implied is that "standards" can be loose at times too. If you read the "standards" for MS-70, 69, and 68 and then check out what is on the market, you may be surprised at what you find. In some cases, the grading of your coins may not be as "tight" as you believe.
@cupronik said: "One would think that PCGS would give submitters incentive to spend $ with them, especially in a tough market like today. Grading has certainly been strict since the new regime took over about 24 months ago. I think gradeflation is a thing of the past."
Great idea PCGS! Crap all over your "standards" and reputation to make more money and please your Registry customers. I made a joke at the first TPGS grading service in DC. Let's give our customers what they want, loose grading! That should make everyone happy and the money will roll in.
NOT!
Here are the ones that didn't get the CAM designation. I can agree with all of them.
1961 25C PR67
1955 50C PR66
1956 50C Type 1 PR67
1959 50C PR67
1959 50C PR68
1958 1C PR67 CAM - I thought this Lincoln (along with the 1956 above) could have received a DCAM designation.
1961 5C PR68 CAM - I thought this one could also have received a DCAM designation.
Congrats on the grades, sadly this is just one turn of a corner in an endless string of twists and turns. Until grading moves away form market/pricing grading; which is highly subjective; to a repeatable standard of grading, opinions will continue to award and disappoint and gradeflation will continue unchecked.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Thanks to the OP, I deleted my confused comment so as not to clutter this thread.
I agree DCAM.
I think you must have missed my individual comments with assigned grades on these 2 coins.
Looks great!!!
I wonder if party of the cause of low prices for moderns is that the supply is so constrained. If pieces were more available at the top it might spur more submissions and more availability of very high grade coins.
I find it remarkable that very scarce coins like nice attractive Gem '69 quarters can be had for 10 to $50. This makes chBU coins just about free when they are ungraded.
@cladking said: "I find it remarkable that very scarce coins like nice attractive Gem '69 quarters can be had for 10 to $50"
Perhaps they are not MS-69's = PERFECT except for 1 or 2 minuscule (and not obvious) marks. I only allow ONE minuscule hairline, hit, or spot for a 69 because I'm anal and hate MS-70's.
It may interest members to know that the last major TPGS to adopt the MS-70 grade was late to the "party" because its owner did not believe a perfect coin existed. They do.
Very impressive results and a gorgeous group of coins. Well done.
Congratulations 👌🏻
Well even your non-CAM coins look great. I agree that the 1956 Penny should have received a DCAM. That is an exceptional coin.
Here is my Washington Quarter Variety Registry Set
This is my Washington Quarter Proof Variety Registry Set
Looks my comment about this was deleted. Not by me
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
I think Cladking was referring to Gem 1969 Quarters, not MS69 Quarters.
I sure hope your "indication of change" is right MCman!
That 56 cent is awesome!
I agree with Keets.
awesome proofs. that would make any ones day complete
NGC has also tightened up IMO. Question is how do we get all those coins that are in gem holders with milk spots and other strange discoloring problems into their proper grades. Couple of PCGS Pf 67 DCam 1952 nickels come to mind and there is no incentive to fix the problem. Buyer beware ! Incidentally those are really nice proofs and are worthy of premium bids...... This along with '36 to '42 proofs has long been my passion as well !