Home U.S. Coin Forum

1806 Half Cent Opinions

burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

Received this latest add to my humble collection and wondered opinions of grade, die state, etc!
Please excuse my crude images- working to improve.

Comments

  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,376 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with Mark. Definitely looks recolored....especially in the first photo...even the 2nd one.
    The color itself, then where the tone changes in a line across

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Bochiman said:
    I agree with Mark. Definitely looks recolored....especially in the first photo...even the 2nd one.
    The color itself, then where the tone changes in a line across

    Unfortunately the obverse toning is due to my poor imaging skills.

  • ArizonaRareCoinsArizonaRareCoins Posts: 679 ✭✭✭✭

    Counterfeit coin. Coin has the markings of a known die-transfer:

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Was this a test?? If so, members passed.... ;) Cheers, RickO

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not really a test, but I am always interested in thoughts from folks who haven't seen these. I have had these tested by a top metallurgist with early copper experience and he views them just by the science as genuine. With 4 of these in genuine TPG holders I have asked my group at what point do these become "accepted" as a new "genuine variety"...

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Initially, I questioned the color on the obverse. Then, I questioned the "C" in CENT and the relation to the leaf in the wreath... I don't think I've ever seen that before on this issue... now I know why!!

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 12, 2019 2:03PM

    @lkenefic said:
    Initially, I questioned the color on the obverse. Then, I questioned the "C" in CENT and the relation to the leaf in the wreath... I don't think I've ever seen that before on this issue... now I know why!!

    Actually lkenefic this one is accurate to a genuine 1806 C-1; so accurate it picked up the circulation marks of the source including the damaged "A" and scratch over "L". This is the 7th example found with 4 of them in genuine TPG holders.

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @burfle23 said:

    @lkenefic said:
    Initially, I questioned the color on the obverse. Then, I questioned the "C" in CENT and the relation to the leaf in the wreath... I don't think I've ever seen that before on this issue... now I know why!!

    Actually lkenefic this one is accurate to a genuine 1806 C-1; so accurate it picked up the circulation marks of the source including the damaged "A" and scratch over "L". This is the 7th example found with 4 of them in genuine TPG holders.

    So, this one is made from dies that used a genuine 1806 C-1 as a template?

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lkenefic said:

    @burfle23 said:

    @lkenefic said:
    Initially, I questioned the color on the obverse. Then, I questioned the "C" in CENT and the relation to the leaf in the wreath... I don't think I've ever seen that before on this issue... now I know why!!

    Actually lkenefic this one is accurate to a genuine 1806 C-1; so accurate it picked up the circulation marks of the source including the damaged "A" and scratch over "L". This is the 7th example found with 4 of them in genuine TPG holders.

    So, this one is made from dies that used a genuine 1806 C-1 as a template?

    Correct.

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 15, 2019 3:33AM

    Extremely informative articles by OP on counterfeits. Many to read and with a lot of details!

    https://coinweek.com/author/jack-d-young/

    Bringing this up from time-to-time keeps everyone informed. Glad @burfle23 is a forum member!

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,281 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't like it either. looks bogus

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 30, 2019 10:52AM

    Thank you Hemispherical!

  • burfle23burfle23 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Had examples professionally photographed at ANA; there are actually 2 "die states" for this series of struck counterfeits. The 1st I call the "cut A" for the cut on the "A" of HALF, the second the "filled A" for the apparent attempted repair job done. But you can see the other matching marks and scratches. You can even see die doubling at the date on a couple. The images are both taken through genuine TPG slabs:

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,948 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is a copy of the 1806 C-1, Small 6, Stemless.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file