Indian 10 GTG....have at it!

Indulger

I picked this up awhile back on the Bay from a auction...I was the only bidder. It sits in one of our hosts earlier holders. The pics were taken with a new iPad under led 60w equivalent lights and some natural. The obverse fields are represented well by the photos.

TennesseeDave

64. Looks nice to my eyes although it's definitely out of my area of collecting.

TommyType

Keeping in mind that I don't know that series...don't collect gold....and hardly ever grade ANYTHING above my mental limit of MS-65....

I'll say MS-65.

MFeld

The first set of images had me thinking MS64 and the second set, MS63. None of them show the coin under good light, and the fact that the obverse scratches didn’t show up in the first set makes me wonder what other flaws might be hidden. Still, my guess is MS63.

Indulger

All good guesses and I agree with @MFeld, not such good light to show off the scratches. This is my first go at posting a gtg and I thank everyone for participating! Will reveal a bit later...

Indulger

.....no correct grades yet!

TradesWithChops

UNC details cleaning. thats the usual way of it with these sorts of photos

blitzdude

62 congrats!

Unknown

This content has been removed.

MFeld

@Indulger said:
All good guesses and I agree with @MFeld, not such good light to show off the scratches. This is my first go at posting a gtg and I thank everyone for participating! Will reveal a bit later...

@Indulger said:
All good guesses and I agree with @MFeld, not such good light to show off the scratches. This is my first go at posting a gtg and I thank everyone for participating! Will reveal a bit later...

If guesses of 63, 64 and 65 are all good guesses, something is very wrong.😉

kaz

my WAG is 58 due to what looks like some rub on the eagle's "shoulder." Whatever it grades, looks really nice.

CharlotteDude

I'm going to say AU-58 is the holder it should be in, based on the images.

logger7

First impression was very pq, or cleaned, hard to tell from the pics...

Smudge

58.

Indulger

@blitzdude said:
62 congrats!

We have a winner! Congrats!

I think it’s under graded by a point or two by today’s standards, but I like it in the old holder. This pic captures the luster better. What looks like rub on the reverse looks more like a weak strike to me.

Thanks again everyone for your input! I will try to do better with the pics next time

Indulger

@MFeld said:

@Indulger said:
All good guesses and I agree with @MFeld, not such good light to show off the scratches. This is my first go at posting a gtg and I thank everyone for participating! Will reveal a bit later...

@Indulger said:
All good guesses and I agree with @MFeld, not such good light to show off the scratches. This is my first go at posting a gtg and I thank everyone for participating! Will reveal a bit later...

If guesses of 63, 64 and 65 are all good guesses, something is very wrong.😉

That’s the holder where I could see this go into possibly....but probably not a 65!

Thanks for the input!

TommyType

Well, as bad as it was, my MS-65 guess looks better with an MS-62 coin than it would have with an AU-58.

(That's my story, and I'm sticking to it).

Indulger

@TommyType said:
Well, as bad as it was, my MS-65 guess looks better with an MS-62 coin than it would have with an AU-58.

(That's my story, and I'm sticking to it).

Roger That! Thanks for playin!

Unknown

This content has been removed.

SeattleSlammer

62 my a** !

Beauty.

MFeld

@SeattleSlammer said:
62 my a** !

Beauty.

If you didn’t already do so, take a good look at the second obverse photo. It shows some scratches that are not apparent in the other pictures. The images present very different appearances and I’d give PCGS the very strong benefit of the doubt.

Indulger

@SeattleSlammer said:
62 my a** !

Beauty.

I agree and Thanks! I don’t care what the holder says....I bought the coin!

ricko

Late to the game... but I would have guessed 62... really... of course, it would have been a 'guess'...as they always are.... Cheers, RickO

Indulger

@ricko said:
Late to the game... but I would have guessed 62... really... of course, it would have been a 'guess'...as they always are.... Cheers, RickO

Haha! Awesome...better late then never....great guess!

asheland

I was at 62. A nice 62 though!