Home U.S. Coin Forum

Welcome thoughts regarding 1799 $10 Gold Piece

northcoinnorthcoin Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭✭✭

Again, welcome thoughts. This one is a Large Stars 1799 $10 gold piece that I have had for almost eighteen years. Considering submitting it to PCGS and then CAC.

Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow...nice old gold.... looks like someone removed something on the reverse.... It could come back details... but still worth getting authenticated. Cheers, RickO

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,446 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with BryceM - submit it to a major, if it straight grades, then consider CAC.
    If not, but comes back Genny, you're still ahead (I'm assuming it's already in a third-world slab
    judging by the plastic around it).

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Love the gold @northcoin.

    Ah, the reverse, did someone try and cleanup a mustard spill? :) It so so specific that that area.

    Submit.

    Please lets us know what happens.

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow China already did really good work nearly 2 decades ago >:)

    Sorry as I couldn't resist :D

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:
    The angle of the photo makes it hard to judge this piece fully, but I do see a patch of suspicious hairlines by the word “AMERICA” on the reverse that will probably give you some trouble with respect to a straight grade. I hope I’m wrong.

    I agree with @Billjones and feel it will details grade.

    PCGS back in the body bag days would refuse early gold for even far less.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,998 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Broadstruck said:
    Wow China already did really good work nearly 2 decades ago >:)

    Sorry as I couldn't resist :D

    The Chinese seem to be too cheap to put good metal in most of their garbage.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,507 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like an accugrade holder. I'd definitely get it in PCGS, even if only a genny.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 3,974 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s a well struck coin with a strong obverse and no adjustment marks on the face. It looks like the reverse has been cleaned around 4:00. The obverse to me looks a little splotchy to the right of the portrait suggesting an old cleaning. Even if it comes back genuine it’s an attractive coin.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,526 ✭✭✭✭✭

    IF that is straight graded you have a real winner, however while it likely will not, it is worth submitting just to authenticate it. Not many of those around in any condition.

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,190 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Details or not, definitely worth sending in, truview, too!

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 14, 2019 2:02PM

    Obviously, there might be some difficulty getting the coin both authenticated and graded. However, if you will send it to me - very quickly - I will return to you a brand new, crisp Ten Dollar ($10.00) FRB in exchange --- PLUS refund your postage !

    I'll stand next to the PO box awaiting your package.

    :)

  • jclovescoinsjclovescoins Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No doubt that this will grade “UNC Details”...they may call it cleaned, damaged or smoothed.

    Would be interested around 8,000 (I’ve bought and sold 4 similar ones in the 7500-12,000 range)

  • ARCOARCO Posts: 4,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cleaned, but a wonderful coin nonetheless.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,523 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @northcoin said:
    Again, welcome thoughts. This one is a Large Stars 1799 $10 gold piece that I have had for almost eighteen years. Considering submitting it to PCGS and then CAC.

    I’m curious as to why you started this thread? I’ve seen enough of your posts and coins you’ve posted to believe that you have a grasp on grading, as well as the relative benefits of the various grading companies. What type of response within this thread would sway you to submit the coin to PCGS or leave it as is?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,167 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 14, 2019 3:40PM

    @MFeld said:

    @northcoin said:
    Again, welcome thoughts. This one is a Large Stars 1799 $10 gold piece that I have had for almost eighteen years. Considering submitting it to PCGS and then CAC.

    I’m curious as to why you started this thread? I’ve seen enough of your posts and coins you’ve posted to believe that you have a grasp on grading, as well as the relative benefits of the various grading companies. What type of response within this thread would sway you to submit the coin to PCGS or leave it as is?

    Interesting thought. I wonder what holder it is in. He could always try to cross at "ANY" straight grade, but it would likely be worth more in a PCGS genuine holder if it doesn't straight grade than in generic plastic.

  • northcoinnorthcoin Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 14, 2019 8:58PM

    Apologies for not responding earlier. Having computer issues. Again, thanks all for the helpful comments.

    To specifically respond to Mark, it is ironic that my motivation to look through some coins (including the one subject of this thread) that haven't seen the light of day since I acquired them was at least in part prompted by a letter I received from one of Mark's associates.

  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Regardless, send it to our host for grading !!! :)

    Timbuk3
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,523 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @northcoin said:
    Apologies for not responding earlier. Having computer issues. Again, thanks all for the helpful comments.

    To specifically respond to Mark, it is ironic that my motivation to look through some coins (including the one subject of this thread) that haven't seen the light of day since I acquired them was at least in part prompted by a letter I received from one of Mark's associates.

    I’m literally laughing out loud.😄 Thanks and by the way, if we know one another, please PM me.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58 details. Considering the huge money at stake I would see if there is some way to wear it down evenly to get it into a straight XF holder with the strong aversion to problem coins.

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 3,974 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @logger7 said:
    58 details. Considering the huge money at stake I would see if there is some way to wear it down evenly to get it into a straight XF holder with the strong aversion to problem coins.

    How do you evenly wear down a 1799 $10? Somehow this doesn’t feel like a good pocket piece coin.

  • matt_dacmatt_dac Posts: 961 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Get that beautiful coin into a holder! Definitely details but still a work of art.

  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭✭✭

    i am giving a different opinion:

    the details are great!

    the obverse looks like it has something on the surface. pvc? putty? not sure, but the discoloration can be seen around liberty and in front (and on) the face and lower bust.

    honestly...

    what i would do with this coin if it were mine...and get ready for the peanut gallery to boo and wish for the dislike button to return...

    i would sent it to NGC for conservation and grading. i think you have a better chance at a straight grade. this is based solely on what i am seeing the photos. i might say something different if viewing in hand.

    either way, get it in a holder just for protection and authenticity. this increases the value even if it doesn't grade. seem like you know this...

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2019 8:34AM

    @northcoin said:
    To specifically respond to Mark, it is ironic that my motivation to look through some coins (including the one subject of this thread) that haven't seen the light of day since I acquired them was at least in part prompted by a letter I received from one of Mark's associates.

    The "inside joke" is that Mark Feld works for Heritage Auctions. They recently sent a letter from Greg Rohan to customers soliciting consignments. This must have nudged northcoin to look at dormant parts of his collection - likely for enjoyment rather than other purposes.

    It's kind of nice, however, to surprise yourself with coins you've forgotten about. One member referred to it as "cherrypicking your own collection."

  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Now that's a difficult to "forget about" that has been hiding in one's own collection.

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Agree with @roadrunner, that means @northcoin must have one heck of a collection! :)

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @skier07 said:

    @logger7 said:
    58 details. Considering the huge money at stake I would see if there is some way to wear it down evenly to get it into a straight XF holder with the strong aversion to problem coins.

    How do you evenly wear down a 1799 $10? Somehow this doesn’t feel like a good pocket piece coin.

    How do you "unclean" a coin? Is there any technique to deal with the hairlines, which no one wants on a collectible coin?

  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2019 11:08AM

    @BillJones said:
    I would not even consider "wearing this piece down" to get a straight. grade.

    i concur.

    especially, since we don't even know for sure it's a "details" grade!

    it may display some potential problems in the photos, but let's not grab torches!

    a coin like this deserves preservation.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not to mention on these Early Eagles, the thinness makes them quite bendable. I bought a nice one in a PCGS MS61 once, a dealer we all know who recently was a guest of the government with 3 squares a day, thought it might upgrade. We cracked it and sent it to NGC. They sent it back saying it was "bent". PCGS was willing to regrade it as a 61.

  • NysotoNysoto Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A very sharp strike on the 1799 BD-10, full eagle breast and neck feathers.

    The 1799 BD-10 reverse die family:

    Eagle ($10) and Half Dollar Reverse Master Die of 1799B

    Eagle Reverse Hub of 1799B. Hub also used to create half dollar reverse working dies 1801 T-1, T-2, 1802, 1803 T-2.

    1799 BD-10 Reverse Working Die F. Also used on 1800 BD-1 and 1801 BD-1.

    Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty - biography of US Mint's first chief engraver
  • 1northcoin1northcoin Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Nysoto said:
    A very sharp strike on the 1799 BD-10, full eagle breast and neck feathers.

    The 1799 BD-10 reverse die family:

    Eagle ($10) and Half Dollar Reverse Master Die of 1799B

    Eagle Reverse Hub of 1799B. Hub also used to create half dollar reverse working dies 1801 T-1, T-2, 1802, 1803 T-2.

    1799 BD-10 Reverse Working Die F. Also used on 1800 BD-1 and 1801 BD-1.

    Apologies again for the delay in responding as the computer issues continue. Thanks so much Nysoto for the added information.

    By the way the book you authored on the subject of the engraver who was responsible for engraving the image on my 1799 coin looks most interesting. How would one secure a copy?

  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Following are Enhanced Brightened Images that may help others discern more details exhibited by the subject coin, including some Haziness to viewer’s right of Miss Liberty and apparent Hairline Scratches circled in Blue between 2:30-4:30 on the reverse surrounding the word “America”.



    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • NysotoNysoto Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1northcoin, thanks for the interest in my book, Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty.

    The book is the first biography of Robert Scot, who was chief engraver of the US Mint from 1793-1823. Based on archival sources, it contains previously unpublished information of the engraving career of Scot, his family, and the enormous output of engravings Scot completed in the United States. Scot completed historically important engravings throughout the American Revolutionary period, and he should be an American hero for his accomplishments.

    The book is still on Amazon, don't pay anymore than the publisher's price from American History Press https://www.amazon.com/Robert-Scot-Engraving-William-Nyberg/dp/1939995094/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Robert+Scot:+engraving+liberty&qid=1559448893&s=gateway&sr=8-1

    It is also on the American History Press website.

    Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty - biography of US Mint's first chief engraver
  • 1northcoin1northcoin Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2, 2019 1:55AM

    @Nysoto said:
    A very sharp strike on the 1799 BD-10, full eagle breast and neck feathers.

    The 1799 BD-10 reverse die family:

    Eagle ($10) and Half Dollar Reverse Master Die of 1799B

    Eagle Reverse Hub of 1799B. Hub also used to create half dollar reverse working dies 1801 T-1, T-2, 1802, 1803 T-2.

    1799 BD-10 Reverse Working Die F. Also used on 1800 BD-1 and 1801 BD-1.

    Thanks for the added info in response to my query. Looking forward to eventually acquiring and reading your book on the subject of the man who engraved many of our country’s earliest coins including the 1799 subject of this thread.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file