Home U.S. Coin Forum

Buying obviously damaged, but ultra rare varieties...

HallcoHallco Posts: 3,647 ✭✭✭✭✭

You know up front that they won't grade. They have pmd, graffiti or have otherwise been altered in one way, shape or form...but you don't see them offered frequently. Do you have a strategy when it comes to a no reserve auction?

«1

Comments

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 9:10AM

    @Coinstartled That’s cool. Nice and simple deep stamps. What does the reverse look like?

    Edit to add:

    @Coinstartled said:

    @Hemispherical said:
    @Coinstartled That’s cool. Nice and simple deep stamps. What does the reverse look like?

    I added the reverse on my earlier post.

    (should have done that originally)

    ;)

    I see... and it sure was a heavy handed punch. The “puncher” made sure those numbers would stand the test of time. :)

  • bobsrbobsr Posts: 392 ✭✭✭✭

    Ever wonder why someone would punch 0 thru 10, at first I thought 1 thru 12 and maybe a clock face for outside then saw it started at 0.
    Interesting
    Bob Sr CEO Fieldtechs

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 7:21AM

    Over the years,I have advised anyone who would listen NOT TO BUY DAMAGED COINS!

    I have proven to be wrong by several full time and part time dealers who make a great living buying/slabbing (or not)/selling damaged coins!

    I feel better already. :)

  • carabonnaircarabonnair Posts: 1,423 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bobsr said:
    Ever wonder why someone would punch 0 thru 10, at first I thought 1 thru 12 and maybe a clock face for outside then saw it started at 0.
    Interesting
    Bob Sr CEO Fieldtechs

    It was used as a whist counter during the card-game craze of the time.

  • numbersmannumbersman Posts: 1,039 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 7:42AM

    As a collector,if it's rare enough,I'll want to buy it even if it's in pieces! The strength of my bid for it in a no reserve auction would correspond directly to it's rarity (as best as I can determine).

    Collector of numeral seals.That's the 1928 and 1928A series of FRNs with a number rather than a letter in the district seal. Owner/operator of Bottom Line Currency
  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:
    Life is short. Buy what you like. I picked this up a couple years ago.

    I initially agreed about buying "problem coins"... don't! But then, this is about the only way I'd ever get into a 1796 Sm Eagle quarter with any remaining detail!

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • yspsalesyspsales Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 7:49AM

    I sold a couple marred rare Newcomb varieties for far less than I wanted.

    Started both at .99 cents

    Even had one guy ask me to stop the auction and sell one to him...

    Turned down $70 and it closed at $15... Yee hah!

    I hate problem coins, but glad it's going to a good home.

    BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out

  • YQQYQQ Posts: 3,314 ✭✭✭✭✭

    sold for 4K ???

    Today is the first day of the rest of my life
  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Hemispherical said:
    @Coinstartled That’s cool. Nice and simple deep stamps. What does the reverse look like?

    I added the reverse on my earlier post.

    (should have done that originally)

    ;)

  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Baley said:

    I once knew a very average dude who would only be willing to date exceptionally Pretty Girls- he rarely went out, and he's probably still a virgin. But one with high standards!

    He became president.

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @carabonnair said:

    @bobsr said:
    Ever wonder why someone would punch 0 thru 10, at first I thought 1 thru 12 and maybe a clock face for outside then saw it started at 0.
    Interesting
    Bob Sr CEO Fieldtechs

    It was used as a whist counter during the card-game craze of the time.

    Ah! Now the current game is Bid Whist. Thanks for this tidbit of info @carabonnair.

  • TradesWithChopsTradesWithChops Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 9:02AM

    There are some rare varieties where the nicest coin in existence (of the known population) might have "damage" --> 1876-s DDO trade dollar as an example. My coin is graded PCGS au-55, with chop marks. Whereas, the second best is au-50 (without chopmarks).

    Easy answer for me though, as I only collect chop marks.

    Minor Variety Trade dollar's with chop marks set:
    More Than It's Chopped Up To Be

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm on a quest to collect all 187 Draped Bust Large Cent Sheldon varieties. Am I going to get there - on my budget - without slumming it on some of the rarest varieties? Of course not! There is certainly a market out there for banged up 1799s and S-217s.

    I'll add that there seems to be greater tolerance for "damage" with early copper than with other coins in general.

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @amwldcoin said:
    I started this one on ebay @ $2499.99. Wanna guess what it sold for?

    This is a rare coin and as all the design elements still there and although it won't straight grade it is a desireable coin.

    The Quarter shown by @Coinstartled isn't even a coin anymore to me. most of the design elements are gone including the date plus it is the damaged by punching numbers into it. This would make it worthless to me whereas the 1822 is still a desireable coin. I wouldn't pay over 20 bucks for that 1796 if even that.

  • abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 9:58AM

    Other than being cleaned the 1822 25 doesn't look too shabby.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @abcde12345 said:
    Other than being cleaned the 1822 25 doesn't look too shabby.

    Just curious, anyone else think this coin should be called "cleaned?"

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    @abcde12345 said:
    Other than being cleaned the 1822 25 doesn't look too shabby.

    Just curious, anyone else think this coin should be called "cleaned?"

    I would say more ED than cleaned.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 10:30AM

    @RogerB said:

    @Coinstartled said:
    Life is short. Buy what you like. I picked this up a couple years ago.

    Looks like so many chopmarked Trade dollars -- why didn't it get a straight grade?

    Actually, it is not even close to a chopmarked coin! Look closer. Somding missing. :'(

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Both are mutilated. That is the first and only consideration. Having one rule for one type of coin and a different rule for another is inconsistent.

  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    @RogerB said:

    @Coinstartled said:
    Life is short. Buy what you like. I picked this up a couple years ago.

    Looks like so many chopmarked Trade dollars -- why didn't it get a straight grade?

    Actually, it is not even close to a chopmarked coin! Look closer. Somding missing. :'(

    I know...I should get it stickered.

    :*

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 26, 2019 11:36AM

    @RogerB said:
    Both are mutilated. That is the first and only consideration. Having one rule for one type of coin and a different rule for another is inconsistent.

    LOL, Tell that to the Large cent "net graders."

    Furthermore, IMHO when one of this country's premier numismatists starts throwing around (misusing) a word such as "mutilated" to describe market acceptable and universally collected coins with chops, countermarks, and counter stamps, it is not helpful. o:)

  • shorecollshorecoll Posts: 5,445 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have an R.5 bust half that I bought about 10 years ago and paid $1000, net graded to VF from heavy cleaning but retoned. I didn't think I'd ever buy one in that grade for full price. Since then, I've seen damaged/cleaned R-5's sell all over the map from $200 to $1000 or more...I guess I'll find out what's worth if I ever sell it.

    ANA-LM, NBS, EAC
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,525 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd probably pay a lot for a damaged 69-S DDO Lincoln, if one's out there.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    LOL, Tell that to the Large cent "net graders."

    Groan...

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    Both are mutilated. That is the first and only consideration. Having one rule for one type of coin and a different rule for another is inconsistent.

    Well not so fast there. Look at the hair curls. Try finding such beauty in an AG3 example for more money. And the brave sole that "mutilated" in the early 1800's, had no more concern for the coin that would not get a pair of shoes cobbled, that you do for the cull Peace Dollar leveling your washing machine.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Baley said

    @Insider2 said:
    >

    LOL... when one of this country's premier numismatists starts throwing around (misusing) a word such as "mutilated" to describe market acceptable and universally collected coins with chops, countermarks, and counter stamps, it is not helpful.

    >
    Almost as bad as throwing around and misusing a word such as "universally", huh?

    LOL, I was eating my lunch. Besides if you had any idea how many (just took the double "n" out of this word) corrections i need to make it would prove (just fixed "oprove") what a bad typist/proofreader I am! My fingers cannot keep up with my thoughts. :(

  • savitalesavitale Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:
    Life is short. Buy what you like. I picked this up a couple years ago.

    That's odd.

  • thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh my,I love that quarter.
    I would had a hard time not grabbing that !
    The 'Ultra Rare' part of the title has me resisting details, as I have never played in that area........

  • IcollecteverythingIcollecteverything Posts: 1,031 ✭✭✭

    I will pay $25 sight unseen for any authentic mutilated 1792 cents or dismes.
    Or is that dismesses?

    Successful BST deals with mustangt and jesbroken. Now EVERYTHING is for sale.

  • daltexdaltex Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If I recall correctly, and it's a big if given the length of time since I read the article, Legend had something like this regarding a bent '94(s) dime. The conclusion was that coins THAT rare would always have a market no matter how damaged.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There are buyers, somewhere, at some price, for all coins... Ebay is clear testament to that... ;) Cheers, RickO

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Your not kidding. One that comes to mind I sold on ebay was a VG 1864 dime. It was crudely altered to make it 12 sided! Never the less it sold for almost $500!

    @ricko said:
    There are buyers, somewhere, at some price, for all coins... Ebay is clear testament to that... ;) Cheers, RickO

  • No serifs E’s by any chance?

  • TradesWithChopsTradesWithChops Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    Both are mutilated. That is the first and only consideration. Having one rule for one type of coin and a different rule for another is inconsistent.

    Your repeated attacks against my choice area of collection is both unprofessional and exhausting. Give it a rest man.

    Minor Variety Trade dollar's with chop marks set:
    More Than It's Chopped Up To Be

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No one is "attacking" what you collect. Long ago, I, too, enjoyed chop marked Trade and Seated dollars.

    I am pointing out one of the notable inconsistencies in ns for authentication and "blessing" them as acceptable. If mutilated Trade dollars are "gradable' then any other coin type with mutilated surfaces should also be "gradable." That is fair to ALL collectors regardless of what they like to collect.

    :)

  • TradesWithChopsTradesWithChops Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    No one is "attacking" what you collect. Long ago, I, too, enjoyed chop marked Trade and Seated dollars.

    I am pointing out one of the notable inconsistencies in ns for authentication and "blessing" them as acceptable. If mutilated Trade dollars are "gradable' then any other coin type with mutilated surfaces should also be "gradable." That is fair to ALL collectors regardless of what they like to collect.

    :)

    I disagree with your choice word of 'mutilated'.. but okay. I see where you're coming from. It IS different, though, in many respects.

    Minor Variety Trade dollar's with chop marks set:
    More Than It's Chopped Up To Be

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I understand your umbrage at "mutilated." Maybe if we could routinely read and understand Cantonese they would become more like merchant counterstamps on other coins. However, to treat analogous 3-rd party punches differently is inconsistent and unfair to other collectors who have equally valid interests.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    I understand your umbrage at "mutilated." Maybe if we could routinely read and understand Cantonese they would become more like merchant counterstamps on other coins. However, to treat analogous 3-rd party punches differently is inconsistent and unfair to other collectors who have equally valid interests.

    It's late and truthfully, not making fun but I'm going to need to read this post a few times in the morning to understand what you wrote.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file