Home U.S. Coin Forum

High end or condition collectors, is the Hansen quest changing your habits?

topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

Just wondering if the Hansen spectacular is changing any of your acquisitions?
Anonymous poll so let us know if you want to. :)

High end or condition collectors, is the Hansen quest changing your habits?

Sign in to vote!
This is a private poll: no-one will see what you voted for.

Comments

  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I buy what I can afford that I like.
    I’m not competing with anyone but myself.
    The Mercury dime group has changed, but a few are still around thank God!
    Some of the fun has been lost, but not all,
    Ken keep up the great work!

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,587 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 13, 2018 3:26PM

    I don’t need to be “the whale” in ares where I collect. I just want to be happy with what I have. I let my purchasing power dictate that I could only collect the best when I could afford it, I would be bored silly.

    If I could be the dealer who was building Hansen’s collection, that would be fun.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,356 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:
    I don’t need to be “the whale” in ares where I collect. I just want to be happy with what I have. I let my purchasing power dictate that I could only collect the best when I could afford it, I would be bored silly.

    To each his own. Personally, I enjoy hunting for great stuff that I "need". And when I find something I need, I hate knowing that I have no chance to buy it. That's why I don't collect Early US Gold, for example. Forget about being the whale. I just cant compete on the coins I would want to buy. And I'm never bored. I just know that I can't collect everything.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • TradesWithChopsTradesWithChops Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭

    Not at all - unless Hansen goes after chopmarked trade dollars.

    Minor Variety Trade dollar's with chop marks set:
    More Than It's Chopped Up To Be

  • ColonialcoinColonialcoin Posts: 713 ✭✭✭✭

    While I totally appreciate and respect what Hansen is accomplishing, it no way affects my collecting. I can go after what I want without worrying about a billionaire competing with me. Colonial era coins for the most part are nonexistent in high end Uncirculated or better. I doubt that he would be interested in a VF or XF state copper.

  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My customers are going all out to remain on top w/#1 sets. I will be announcing a new one soon-and its all cac!

    He really does not interfere with what we do.

  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 6,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 13, 2018 5:39PM

    I like what everyone above has written. Like all of you I am just doing my own thing. On the variety sets, he has actully bought some of my crumbs. So I have plenty of room to upgrade when I cherry pick varities, while he has to always pay full retail.

    WS

    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,443 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I collect in an area where I can find very high quality and eye appealing coinage "in the wild" (aka raw) and look for high quality coins that I can purchase for modest money.

    If I ever get to the point where I have more disposable income [living in the Bay Area and raising two children through college is very expensive] I will likely branch out and play a little bit in a deeper end of the hobby pool.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    At least he's not an "Everyman" Collector! :D

  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Recently sold my #1 1937 Mint set after Mr. Hansen entered the fray. Is it possible he actually drives collectors away from the Registry, as in not able to compete so why bother?

  • santinidollarsantinidollar Posts: 1,056 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 13, 2018 5:55PM

    That’s a league I don’t play in. Mine’s not bad at all. I’ll wait for my first bullion to jump in there.

  • ranshdowranshdow Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭✭

    He recently bought a coin I had passed on. Probably a fluke but it did get my attention. Good thing I'm not 'serious' enough to be bidding in auctions.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,178 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @amwldcoin said:
    At least he's not an "Everyman" Collector! :D

    I want to see the Eliasberg lowball set - nothing above G4.

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,464 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2018 3:10AM

    I'm not a collector anymore... or less.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,178 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No. Why would you let someone else or his taste dictate how you enjoy your hobby?

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,606 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2018 9:49AM

    I do focus on only MS pieces but my niche will never be the highest graded coins for the issue and series.

    Rather, I look for the most bang for my buck....finding coins that are undergraded and in the highest percentage of their grades, which are usually choice or near gem for the keys, and higher for the rest (more moderately rare to common issues).

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    in a much smaller scope this is my take

    🌺 Happy & Content with and in your own mean to collect is an important part of keeping any hobby FUN.

    🐠 I am a tiny fish in the big pond doing my tiny happy collecting without any influence nor envy of others.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,694 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't participate in the PCGS registry (because I know that great coins are found in all holders) so while moderately good drama it has zero effect on me.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree. The registries are just a tool to herd you into specific plastic.
    :|

  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,465 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have not heard of this "Hansen" person. I don't buy on other peoples collecting/hoard habits. I am totally at fault for my agglomeration/collection.

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    high end is nice but if i see something i like better then i go for it (ex: a xf 45 coin)

  • FullStrikeFullStrike Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭

    There's only one thing I'm wondering about at this point...... how soon will we be seeing this Collection for Sale?

    One decade? Two?

    My best guess is 2 years from January. FUN 2021 would be super FUN. 👑

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,606 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2018 12:16PM

    Not implying anything about Hansen but...

    A lot of whales are actually collecting beyond their means, which is why they sell, after completion, right away, because they need their money back.

    Why do that? Just to say you did it? Seems crazy to me...

    I would rather collect to hold and enjoy what I love, which will also maximize my returns down the road. JMHO.

    Buy the best you can afford (QDB calls it finding the optimal collecting grade or level).

    Also, as sages have said for ages--buy the coin and not the holder.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,694 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @topstuf said:
    I agree. The registries are just a tool to herd you into specific plastic.
    :|

    I do like the registry idea and do participate in the registry ATS. Primarily because ATS used to include both companies in the registry, now that that side of the street is also exclusive my desire to do any further sets has been curbed. Also the registry is a great backup for my collection inventory.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,606 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2018 1:33PM

    @coinbuf said:

    @topstuf said:
    I agree. The registries are just a tool to herd you into specific plastic.
    :|

    I do like the registry idea and do participate in the registry ATS. Primarily because ATS used to include both companies in the registry, now that that side of the street is also exclusive my desire to do any further sets has been curbed. Also the registry is a great backup for my collection inventory.

    I feel the same way. My Walker sets would almost all be done, if not for what they did ATS. I find myself less interested in the registry and NGC coins, in general, now, although I'll still buy them, if they're REALLY good or if the slab is rare. Now, I just want full certified sets.

    The registry is/was a great place to showcase your collection and share knowledge. Just having a complete higher ranking set was fine with me. I NEVER tried to be number one.

    As far as crossing and cracking; I'm not into that game and don't plan on it any time soon.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,328 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hope he doesn’t do Latin America

  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerfan said:

    @coinbuf said:

    @topstuf said:
    I agree. The registries are just a tool to herd you into specific plastic.
    :|

    I do like the registry idea and do participate in the registry ATS. Primarily because ATS used to include both companies in the registry, now that that side of the street is also exclusive my desire to do any further sets has been curbed. Also the registry is a great backup for my collection inventory.

    I feel the same way. My Walker sets would almost all be done, if not for what they did ATS. I find myself less interested in the registry and NGC coins, in general, now, although I'll still buy them, if they're REALLY good or if the slab is rare. Now, I just want full certified sets.

    The registry is/was a great place to showcase your collection and share knowledge. Just having a complete higher ranking set was fine with me. I NEVER tried to be number one.

    As far as crossing and cracking; I'm not into that game and don't plan on it any time soon.

    I agree with this exactly. I was very disappointed with NGC’s decision as I enjoy collecting coins in both holders but I have a compulsion to try to complete the sets in which I participate. I would guess before the decision my set was 60/40 in favor of PCGS but after they stopped allowing PC coins that split is probably 85/15 or even 90/10 heavily favoring our host. In addition, I have thought about doing PCGS-only registries for my toned collection since I don’t mind (and often have) duplicates and want to keep both.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,606 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2018 2:20PM

    @david3142 said:

    @Walkerfan said:

    @coinbuf said:

    @topstuf said:
    I agree. The registries are just a tool to herd you into specific plastic.
    :|

    I do like the registry idea and do participate in the registry ATS. Primarily because ATS used to include both companies in the registry, now that that side of the street is also exclusive my desire to do any further sets has been curbed. Also the registry is a great backup for my collection inventory.

    I feel the same way. My Walker sets would almost all be done, if not for what they did ATS. I find myself less interested in the registry and NGC coins, in general, now, although I'll still buy them, if they're REALLY good or if the slab is rare. Now, I just want full certified sets.

    The registry is/was a great place to showcase your collection and share knowledge. Just having a complete higher ranking set was fine with me. I NEVER tried to be number one.

    As far as crossing and cracking; I'm not into that game and don't plan on it any time soon.

    I agree with this exactly. I was very disappointed with NGC’s decision as I enjoy collecting coins in both holders but I have a compulsion to try to complete the sets in which I participate. I would guess before the decision my set was 60/40 in favor of PCGS but after they stopped allowing PC coins that split is probably 85/15 or even 90/10 heavily favoring our host. In addition, I have thought about doing PCGS-only registries for my toned collection since I don’t mind (and often have) duplicates and want to keep both.

    I am doing PCGS only for two new, non-Walker, one-per-date sets that I have recently started.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinbuf said:

    @topstuf said:
    I agree. The registries are just a tool to herd you into specific plastic.
    :|

    I do like the registry idea and do participate in the registry ATS. Primarily because ATS used to include both companies in the registry, now that that side of the street is also exclusive my desire to do any further sets has been curbed. Also the registry is a great backup for my collection inventory.

    That's why I phrased it as I did. When ATS took ....all....slabs...fine. Now they're just as useless for complete runs.

    I still think that nothing is better than Collective Coin for keeping track of your stuff.

    https://collectivecoin.com/

    Although it's being ruined by jerks with multithousand dollar "for sales" on raw canadian pennies from circulation and stuff.

    But for inventory and pix, it works very well. :)

  • bidaskbidask Posts: 14,017 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MrEureka said:

    @BillJones said:
    I don’t need to be “the whale” in ares where I collect. I just want to be happy with what I have. I let my purchasing power dictate that I could only collect the best when I could afford it, I would be bored silly.

    To each his own. Personally, I enjoy hunting for great stuff that I "need". And when I find something I need, I hate knowing that I have no chance to buy it. That's why I don't collect Early US Gold, for example. Forget about being the whale. I just cant compete on the coins I would want to buy. And I'm never bored. I just know that I can't collect everything.

    Over the years I have owned a little bit of this and a little bit of that . All high end . :)

    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,587 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerfan said:

    @david3142 said:

    @Walkerfan said:

    @coinbuf said:

    @topstuf said:
    I agree. The registries are just a tool to herd you into specific plastic.
    :|

    I do like the registry idea and do participate in the registry ATS. Primarily because ATS used to include both companies in the registry, now that that side of the street is also exclusive my desire to do any further sets has been curbed. Also the registry is a great backup for my collection inventory.

    I feel the same way. My Walker sets would almost all be done, if not for what they did ATS. I find myself less interested in the registry and NGC coins, in general, now, although I'll still buy them, if they're REALLY good or if the slab is rare. Now, I just want full certified sets.

    The registry is/was a great place to showcase your collection and share knowledge. Just having a complete higher ranking set was fine with me. I NEVER tried to be number one.

    As far as crossing and cracking; I'm not into that game and don't plan on it any time soon.

    I agree with this exactly. I was very disappointed with NGC’s decision as I enjoy collecting coins in both holders but I have a compulsion to try to complete the sets in which I participate. I would guess before the decision my set was 60/40 in favor of PCGS but after they stopped allowing PC coins that split is probably 85/15 or even 90/10 heavily favoring our host. In addition, I have thought about doing PCGS-only registries for my toned collection since I don’t mind (and often have) duplicates and want to keep both.

    I am doing PCGS only for two new, non-Walker, one-per-date sets that I have recently started.

    This shows how the decision ATS really blew up in their faces. After they barred the PCGS coins, I pretty much switched to PCGS exclusively. When I was finishing my Classic Head Quarter Eagle set, I went for PCGS coins exclusively. At least in my case, ATS decreased my demand for their products

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,400 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2018 6:21PM

    Collectors who are focused and willing to pay a premium should be able to compete well with Hansen as he doesn't follow the overpay philosophy. Here's a quote on a coin he lost:

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/11943400/#Comment_11943400

    @JBatDavidLawrence said:

    @specialist said:
    Delloy was not the buyer but he was in a shoot out

    I was privileged to represent Mr. Hansen in the auction and indeed, we lost the coin in a shootout. Congratulations to the winner!

    It goes to show you, when you're collecting a wide variety of coins, there's a limit to what you value any coin, no matter the rarity and the need to fill the hole. It's a fascinating rarity and we were certainly disappointed!

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,356 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bidask said:
    @bidask said:

    @MrEureka said:

    @BillJones said:
    I don’t need to be “the whale” in ares where I collect. I just want to be happy with what I have. I let my purchasing power dictate that I could only collect the best when I could afford it, I would be bored silly.

    To each his own. Personally, I enjoy hunting for great stuff that I "need". And when I find something I need, I hate knowing that I have no chance to buy it. That's why I don't collect Early US Gold, for example. Forget about being the whale. I just cant compete on the coins I would want to buy. And I'm never bored. I just know that I can't collect everything.

    Over the years I have owned a little bit of this and a little bit of that . All high end . :)

    I meant that I can't collect everything all at once. First, because I can't afford to do it. Second, as Steven Wright says, "You can't have everything. Where would you put it?"

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 15, 2018 7:30PM

    Anybody have a Hansen...Like this one? (for sale now)
    If it was a MS64, I'd seriously think about it.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file