Options
Toned Morgan GTG (and is it CAC ?) ---Grade Posted!
marcmoish
Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
I tried to hide the cert# so no cheating here guys 
7
Comments
64 - strike and luster hold it back for me
What is CTC?
I'm thinking CAC.
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
63
my bad, typo, I corrected it.
64+ ..CTC ?.
Oh no...not another CTC discussion. Nice coin...
CC
Impossible to say without knowing the TPG grade... After giving an honest opinion, I did look up the actual grade, and I would say no CAC unless the True View is misrepresenting the amount of luster. The luster was a major factor in my guess/opinion. If the luster is stronger in hand, I might think differently.
64 CAC
MS62 & yes it did.
I like it.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
62 at best, but I don't like tones so that may bias my grade.
63+
And it doesn’t really matter
64 CAC
63 AND CTC
64 CAC
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
65 cac
same
the luster is fantastic .
MS64 with a green bean.
Very nice looking toner!
MS64 no sticker?
My YouTube Channel
Real nice! 64
66 After the luster/toning bump.
Collector, occasional seller
Let’s make it 3 votes for 65 CAC
If the luster is there, then it has a shot as is for a sticker and a gem grade isn't unreasonable. The surfaces are obviously very clean, but the True View made it look muted which is why you received many of the grading opinions that you did.
Hrmm 64+ no cac
The Koolaid drinkers are going to have a tough time with this one
Nice 64, please for the love of god crack her, dip her and make her beautiful again.
hell no, but tempted to flag you for abuse
LOL, any relation to that Arizona guy? May as well add to my flag totals. Nice coin seriously but....well never mind.
I am in the 64 CAC crowd. Seems like some chatter on the cheek keeps it from a 65, but the fields look pretty mark free which puts it above 63.
Best, SH
I think it's a 65 and no CAC. There is some green residue on the reverse which I can't tell if it's PVC or not. It's above the T in UNITED and in the denticles. If it's not PVC then I think it did CAC.
64.
You did well nice grade and coin. I saw it but I wont give it away for you.
Hoard the keys.
65
At least a 64
65 CAC
64 and who knows if it’s CAC. Has it been sent in?
Latin American Collection
thanks, agreed!
I will post the slab shortly ~~~
65 no CAC.
Great > @10000lakes said:
Yes they will lol, the TV is nice, but still does not do this one justice.
it is 66 CAC
Hmmmm. Must have decided the cheek gouge is a planchet flaw rather than hit. Hard to ascertain that off an image but I don’t see any raised edges on it so could be true
this GTG won this round for sure.
TDN, its OK you can be off big time at least once a month
I thought it could be a weird artifact from the toning. The only noticeable hit I saw was on the lower jaw.
Indeed, and this is what transpired here with this one - exactly what you wrote.
That coin must have turned in the holder.:(
Well, I would have missed this one by three grades... thought it was a 63 with a shot at 4 if there was luster not showing in the TV..... Sooprize, sooprize, sooprize Sargent...Cheers, RickO
I've already seen the grade.
Prior to the grade reveal, I would have posted 'a technical 64, but because of the nice toning, a 65 for sure.'
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)