It's a no go. Fake as can be. Only 3 Vams for this date and it does not match any of them. Date numerals are off as well. Obverse stars a way too mushy for this level of preservation....no jive.
bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
Yea, I don't like it. The obverse looks too mushy. Fake
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@AUandAG said:
It's a no go. Fake as can be. Only 3 Vams for this date and it does not match any of them. Date numerals are off as well. Obverse stars a way too mushy for this level of preservation....no jive.
Comments
It looks good to me
It's a no go. Fake as can be. Only 3 Vams for this date and it does not match any of them. Date numerals are off as well. Obverse stars a way too mushy for this level of preservation....no jive.
bob
Counterfeiters just keep getting better.
i dont like the obverse. jmo
It looks mushy, I think fake.
My YouTube Channel
I am leaning strongly toward fake.
The date looks funky.
Good grief! Who would?
Yeap,Yeap,Yeap! FAKE
Fake. Details way too soft and rounded and mushy for that level of "wear"
Fake, looks mushy
Yea, I don't like it. The obverse looks too mushy. Fake
Fake and not even a good one
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
I agree with Bob. It's not even a good fake.
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
I'm not even a Morgan fan and I see fake.
I agree.... fake... mushy stars and date is fuzzy... Cheers, RickO