Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Favorable Dipping Results - 1830 Capped Bust Half Dime... RESULTS POSTED!!!

BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭
Say may call it unethical or say "you've damaged a perfectly original coin", but personally, I feel a quick dip actually did this piece good. Now you can actually appreciate the fine details, when before they were masked by a layer of brown.

This is something I purchase raw on eBay as a VF. The toning was understandibly so thick that someone mistook it for a circulated piece. image

image
Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
«13

Comments

  • coin22lovercoin22lover Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭
    I think it looks MUCH better. In fact, I would probably try to just make it blast white, personally, I think the toning was ugly.
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I think it looks MUCH better. In fact, I would probably try to just make it blast white, personally, I think the toning was ugly. >>



    I thought about that. I just didn't want to soak it to the point where the surfaces would look dull and unnatural.

    And I thought leaving some toning might give it a little "character"...? image
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>image >>



    Not a fan, Lance? image

    I'm usually opposed to dipping, if it makes you feel any better. image
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • coin22lovercoin22lover Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭
    Normally I'm not a fan of dipped coins at all, actually, but I support your call on this one.
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Neither look is particularly attractive, but the post-dip coin also looks unnatural. I'd have
    left it alone, personally.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,684 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not a bad job. That said, I slightly prefer the original version. But I like crust.

    Dave
    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭
    I want to make it clear that I am opposed to dipping 99% of the time...

    As much as I could appreciate this coin's originality before dipping it, I couldn't appreciate any of the details. It might as well have been a VF piece, because that's about as much detail as I could make out!

    The toning was a lot darker than my first pair of pics suggests, trust me.

    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • SoCalBigMarkSoCalBigMark Posts: 2,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wonder what effect a long soak in Acetone would have done.
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    One option to consider in the future is selling such a coin and buying a dipped one with the
    proceeds.
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i am not convinced the pre-dip photo is doing the coin justice. it appears out of focus to me and i wonder, after seeing the post-dip photo, if the angle of light was correct for us to see the luster on the pre-dip. i guess that's my way of saying i think i like the coin better before the dip.
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>... if the angle of light was correct for us to see the luster on the pre-dip... >>



    You could not detect any luster before the dip. Not even a shimmer at the peripheries. Nothing.

    Just brown.
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,808 ✭✭✭✭✭
    one more dip and you'll have something image. Seriously it looks better now but then I prefer my coins to look minty fresh.
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • magikbillymagikbilly Posts: 6,780
    Agree with CoinJunkie, Lance, Realeone etc.
    "Now that you've found it...it's gone" - radiohaed

    Eric

  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭
    Well, what's done is done. You either like it or you hate it...

    And I was reluctant to dip it, just for the record. I'd never have considered dipping it if the coin weren't for resale image
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,756 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm a firm believer in no dipping, other than acetone. I find the exception in this case.




    Edit to add this after thought. A good deal of dealers and collectors would have done what you did but
    probably all the way white. Not saying its right but done quite often.

  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭✭
    I can't say I like either version particularly much. I'd prefer #1 with luster but from your description that kind of look won't get you too much approval from either TPG.

    The post-look is the kind of material NGC absolutely drools over. Send it to them to make a fast buck and forget about it.
  • magikbillymagikbilly Posts: 6,780
    I don't know how to express...like a story with the beginning and end - but the middle ripped out.

    Eric
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,775 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I usually hate dipped coins, an love original , but in this case,
    Fantastic job, coin looks great!!

    Congrats on spotting a real winner under all that ugliness. Looking at the original photo's I could see a potentially AU piece, but your dipping has brought out the best of this piece.
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,731 ✭✭✭✭✭
    favorable?

    toned coin with spots

    to

    blast white coin with spots


    lose-lose.



    although a toned coin with toning spots is more natural, so that is a less lose.
    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • magikbillymagikbilly Posts: 6,780


    << <i>The post-look is the kind of material NGC absolutely drools over. Send it to them to make a fast buck and forget about it. >>

    - stealer

    I agree.

    Eric
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The post-look is the kind of material NGC absolutely drools over. Send it to them to make a fast buck and forget about it. >>

    - stealer

    I agree.

    Eric >>



    If PCGS kicks it back, that's the plan image
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • northcoinnorthcoin Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Surprised no one has commented on the ugly scratch across the face on the obverse of the predipped coin. Ironically, by getting rid of the scratch the coin now has a chance of getting a decent grade instead of being returned as genuine due to "cleaning" because of the scratch. As to eye appeal otherwise pre and post dip that is a toss-up depending on one's likes or dislikes as evident by the varied responses above.
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Surprised no one has commented on the ugly scratch across the face on the obverse of the predipped coin. Ironically, by getting rid of the scratch the coin now has a chance of getting a decent grade instead of being returned as genuine due to "cleaning" because of the scratch. As to eye appeal otherwise pre and post dip that is a toss-up depending on one's likes or dislikes as evident by the varied responses above. >>


    Unless that scratch only penetrated the grunge layer on the coin, I highly doubt a scratch could be "dipped out." More likely the camera picking up on a fine hairline that doesn't show in the second image.
  • 1Mike11Mike1 Posts: 4,427 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
    "May the silver waves that bear you heavenward be filled with love’s whisperings"

    "A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
  • This content has been removed.
  • northcoinnorthcoin Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Surprised no one has commented on the ugly scratch across the face on the obverse of the predipped coin. Ironically, by getting rid of the scratch the coin now has a chance of getting a decent grade instead of being returned as genuine due to "cleaning" because of the scratch. As to eye appeal otherwise pre and post dip that is a toss-up depending on one's likes or dislikes as evident by the varied responses above. >>


    Unless that scratch only penetrated the grunge layer on the coin, I highly doubt a scratch could be "dipped out." More likely the camera picking up on a fine hairline that doesn't show in the second image. >>



    Valid observation though my assumption is just that - the scratch was deep into the toning and the only way to get rid of it was to dissolve the toning. I suppose if it was actually deeper that some Q tip applied solution might make it disappear if not too deep into the metal.
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Surprised no one has commented on the ugly scratch across the face on the obverse of the predipped coin. Ironically, by getting rid of the scratch the coin now has a chance of getting a decent grade instead of being returned as genuine due to "cleaning" because of the scratch. As to eye appeal otherwise pre and post dip that is a toss-up depending on one's likes or dislikes as evident by the varied responses above. >>


    Unless that scratch only penetrated the grunge layer on the coin, I highly doubt a scratch could be "dipped out." More likely the camera picking up on a fine hairline that doesn't show in the second image. >>



    Valid observation though my assumption is just that - the scratch was deep into the toning and the only way to get rid of it was to dissolve the toning. I suppose if it was actually deeper that some Q tip applied solution might make it disappear if not too deep into the metal. >>


    That would be one impressively thick layer if you are correct image

    Brian would be able to tell us which is the reality.
  • northcoinnorthcoin Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    pre-dip

    imageimage

    post-dip

    imageimage >>



    JUst a refresh to show the scratch being discussed.
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,191 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Surprised no one has commented on the ugly scratch across the face on the obverse of the predipped coin. Ironically, by getting rid of the scratch the coin now has a chance of getting a decent grade instead of being returned as genuine due to "cleaning" because of the scratch. As to eye appeal otherwise pre and post dip that is a toss-up depending on one's likes or dislikes as evident by the varied responses above. >>


    Unless that scratch only penetrated the grunge layer on the coin, I highly doubt a scratch could be "dipped out." More likely the camera picking up on a fine hairline that doesn't show in the second image. >>



    Valid observation though my assumption is just that - the scratch was deep into the toning and the only way to get rid of it was to dissolve the toning. I suppose if it was actually deeper that some Q tip applied solution might make it disappear if not too deep into the metal. >>



    My photo exaggerates the scratch a bit. It's really only a hairline... but a fresh one. It did contrast with the toning, and was quite distracting. Even with the scratch, the coin probably would have graded, but it was still a bit of an eye sore.

    This was also a factor in my ultimate decision to dip the coin. I figured the scratch would blend better with white surfaces, and it does.
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • This content has been removed.
  • MarkInDavisMarkInDavis Posts: 1,720 ✭✭✭✭
    I probably wouldn't have had the huevos to dip or post it, but I think it looks much nicer. I still see the toning/spotting as a negative though.
    image Respectfully, Mark
  • magikbillymagikbilly Posts: 6,780
    Hello,

    yes, that did occur to m4e, because of the numerous posts by "the big three" in here that have pointed out this type of loss time and again on things like Trade Dollars and other coins etc.

    Eric
  • GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,751 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It needs another dip,,,,,, image

    Soak for awhile this time image

    GrandAmimage
    GrandAm :)
  • LochNESSLochNESS Posts: 4,829 ✭✭✭
    I'm surprised by the anti-toning comments in this thread, having read so many pro-toning posts since joining the forum.

    I've never dipped or cleaned a coin, but I've thought about it. I even set aside a small pile of 10-12 potential dip-ees (Ag and Cu-Ni).

    The main reason I haven't done it yet is because I'm nervous about f'ing up the natural tone / eye appeal. One is a $75 hazy proof, the rest are $15-$30 uglies similar to the OP - but not nearly as bad.
    If the OP were mine I would've dipped because I can't stand the sight of it natural and doubt I could sell it, but then again, I never would've bought in the first place. I'm curious did you buy with the intent to dip? Were you looking for a dip candidate?
    ANA LM • WBCC 429

    Amat Colligendo Focum

    Top 10FOR SALE

    image
  • Tdec1000Tdec1000 Posts: 3,852 ✭✭✭
    I like it better now, I appreciate originality but that coin was fugly. Heck I'd dip it once more.

    Awarded the coveted "You Suck" Award on 22 Oct 2010 for finding a 1942/1 D Dime in silver, and on 7 Feb 2011 Cherrypicking a 1914 MPL Cent on Ebay!

    Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin looks much better dipped.... good job, you did not overdo it and the result is a much more attractive coin. Cheers, RickO
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,395 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Ok let me throw you guys a curve, did it occur to anyone that this piece could be a pedigreed specimen that when original was an exact match to the famous pedigreed plate coin but after the dip it just about makes it almost impossible to match but what is barely left proves it has been dipped and altered since what is remaining is still a match and thus makes it known as the very dipped Famous Pedigree.
    I passed on a Norweb just for those reasons that was listed for sale by a top shelf dealer who was clueless, I also believe that dealer was the culprit who did the deed since he couldn't stop telling me how original the coin was and how much luster it had. It took me 5 minutes to match this coin to the Norweb Plate catalog, I couldn't have been the only one. BTW it sold right after I returned it. I don't like losing original pedigreed coins to the coin doctor. >>



    Maybe it came from the famous Bill and Mary Jones Collection or some other random named set. I highly doubt Eliasberg, Norweb or any other pedigree worth naming settled for that coin.
  • Tdec1000Tdec1000 Posts: 3,852 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The coin looks much better dipped.... good job, you did not overdo it and the result is a much more attractive coin. Cheers, RickO >>



    +1 image
    Awarded the coveted "You Suck" Award on 22 Oct 2010 for finding a 1942/1 D Dime in silver, and on 7 Feb 2011 Cherrypicking a 1914 MPL Cent on Ebay!

    Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,768 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't see much of an improvement. The coin had heavy spotting which those who have had some experience with dipping would have deduced would not be removed by the procedure. You started off with a coin that was unattractive because of the spots and toning, and now you have a coin that is still unattractive with spots.

    Contrary to what the purists might think, I'm not convinced that this coin was "original" before this was done. Quite often you see coins that have unattractive toning that resulted after the pieces were dipped because the dipping solution was not rinsed and neutralized from the coin. As a result the weak acids, which is what dipping solutions are, continued to react with the coin which resulted in toning and spots. The next question about this coin is will it be farily stable and continue to exhibit the current post dip appearance or will it re-tone to what will probably be an unattractive color?
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623


    << <i>I usually hate dipped coins, an love original , but in this case,
    Fantastic job, coin looks great!!

    Congrats on spotting a real winner under all that ugliness. Looking at the original photo's I could see a potentially AU piece, but your dipping has brought out the best of this piece. >>


    I agree it looks much better and the little bit left will make some go look how original it is. Most of the people poo pah-ing have collections full of coins like this.
  • DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,377 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks much better.

    I feel very strongly that the TPG's would have graded the undipped coin much lower than the dipped coin.
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623


    << <i>I really hope this thread will promote non-dipping in the future.
    Interestingly this thread is a also a great benefit, it shows you that there are so many dipped coins out there and you now have a before and after, and hopefully thi swill be the poster boy to all those coins many here originally thought were unmessed but were in fact dipped and then another point being made here is they are getting slabbed because it is market acceptable to the tpg's , >>



    Realone
    I just wanted to let you know your admittedly amazing collection of coins you post from time to time in the old NGC holders have been dipped and retoned those pretty blues and what not. Most likely right before they were originally slabbed. While they are really some amazing coins not exactly in the same league with the OP's, lets not throw coins in a glass house. This advise goes to just about anyone with silver coins in theirs collection.
  • MrHalfDimeMrHalfDime Posts: 3,440 ✭✭✭✭
    "One option to consider in the future is selling such a coin and buying a dipped one with the proceeds."

    Best response yet!

    They that can give up essential Liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither Liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
  • This content has been removed.
  • WingedLiberty1957WingedLiberty1957 Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks better dipped IMHO ...

    If it was me, at this point, I would keep going and remove all the black spots (if that was possible).

    That being said, I wouldn't have bought this coin either before or after.

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,571 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In the end it will just tone again, another way.
  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice job image Before, saying all you want about originality, the coin was a pig.
    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • hchcoinhchcoin Posts: 4,837 ✭✭✭✭✭
    BustHalfBrian,

    The next question I would have is how many people that have seen this thread will no longer buy a coin from you because they are afraid you may have dipped it????????

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file