Guess the Grade, recent submission Morgan $

Comments

• LogPotato Posts: 2,177 ✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 10:19AM

  63
  62
  cleaned
  55

  0
• jdimmick Posts: 9,783 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 10:27AM

  63
  62
  55
  cleaned

  0
• CoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 10:28AM

  
  
  << <i>63
  62
  cleaned
  55 >>
  
  
  
  

  My Roosevelt Dime Registry Set

  0
• DennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 11:26AM

  
  
  << <i>63
  62
  cleaned
  55 >>
  
  Yep... that's my opinion too.

  When in doubt, don't.

  0
• coinkat Posts: 23,856 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 11:37AM

  63
  62
  55
  cleaned- lustre looks impaired

  Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  0
• GeorgeKellogg Posts: 1,251 ✭✭

  March 25, 2012 11:50AM

  62
  Cleaned
  55
  63

  "Clamorous for Coin"

  0
• AUandAG Posts: 24,942 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 11:55AM

  Cleaned
  61
  Cleaned
  55
  
  
  The 80cc looks like it's a nice coin and maybe a 64, but I do see evidence of dipping
  and an improper rinse.
  
  bob

  Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  

  0
• Rollerman Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 1:04PM

  63
  62
  cleaned
  64 (perhaps an over dipped satiney coin - decent strike and few marks, lack of luster holds grade to low end 64)
  
  Pete

  "Ain't None of Them play like him (Bix Beiderbecke) Yet."
  Louis Armstrong

  0
• TPRC Posts: 3,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 1:10PM

  63
  62
  55
  cleaned
  

  Tom

  0
• stealer Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 1:16PM

  63
  62
  cleaned
  55

  0
• Pokermandude Posts: 2,713 ✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 1:22PM

  63
  62
  cleaned
  55

  http://stores.ebay.ca/Mattscoin - Canadian coins, World Coins, Silver, Gold, Coin lots, Modern Mint Products & Collections

  0
• DieClash Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 1:41PM

  
  
  << <i>63
  62
  55
  cleaned >>
  
  
  
  Tom, Spot on! What made you decide the 1899 was "cleaned"? I picked it up in 2004 from a retired school teacher who inherited from his father in the 60's. The coin was stored in a Whitman tri-fold folder that was not favorable to the obverse. This particular coin has not been messed with in 40 years! I'm like "wow" it's cleaned already?
  
  Thanks, Kirk

  "Please help us keep these boards professional and informative…. And fun." - DW
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES

  0
• DieClash Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 2:04PM

  Since I let the proverbial cat out of the bag early, I must recognize kudos to jdimmick and coincat for guessing all 4 coin grades correctly. I remain curious over the 1899 cleaned PCGS designation though. As mentioned previously, the 1899 was purchased in 2004 from a retired School teacher whose father had acquired the coin in the 1960s. The specimen was stored in a traditional tri-fold Whitman Folder. So how is it that this particular coin grades "92 cleaned" @ PCGS?

  "Please help us keep these boards professional and informative…. And fun." - DW
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES

  0
• Coinlearner Posts: 2,501 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 2:05PM

  64---62---55 cleaned---55

  0
• sf340flier Posts: 179 ✭

  March 25, 2012 4:04PM

  63
  62
  cleaned
  55
  

  0
• sf340flier Posts: 179 ✭

  March 25, 2012 4:06PM

  99 looks AU, but it's tough to see the cleaning from the photo...my guess is it was really over-dipped and is "lifeless."
  
  The 88-s looks cleaned to me as I see quite a few hairlines.
  
  By the way...nice coins.

  1
• LeeBone Posts: 4,619 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2012 10:57PM

  
  
  << <i>
  
  << <i>63
  62
  cleaned
  55 >>
  
  Yep... that's my opinion too. >>
  
  
  
  

  0