Options
Doctored coins

Coin doctoring has come under serious heat the last few years, it's a "no-no" for lack of a better phrase. Let's say doctoring stops right now...it's over and done with. We are left with a bunch of coins, some are doctored, some are not. What should be done with the doctored coins? Do we un-doctor them? (kind-of sounds a bit hypocritical...alterations are the problem to begin with, are re-alterations OK?) Should they be tossed? Melted? Should they be certified as "genuine, doctored?" Should they be left alone? There are seriously rare coins that have been doctored. In some cases they are trying for a higher grade, in others the restorer is simply trying to minimize the visual impact of whatever problem the coins have.
What should be done with the doctored coins? I really don't know, what does PCGS do with one? Just send it back? Counterfeit coins get turned into the government right?...perhaps there should be an organization that deals with identifying, registering, encapsulating doctored coins. I dunno, just thinking out loud.
What should be done with the doctored coins? I really don't know, what does PCGS do with one? Just send it back? Counterfeit coins get turned into the government right?...perhaps there should be an organization that deals with identifying, registering, encapsulating doctored coins. I dunno, just thinking out loud.
0
Comments
i'm still awaiting laser serial etching by grading companies
perhaps the ANA can accept these coins as donations for educational purposes. The donations can be given a tax right-off to PCGS, NGC and any other donators for full value.
The coins could then be used during summer seminar as examples of doctored coins.
<< <i>PCGS and NGC can buy the problem pieces off the market. They might be able to recoup their loss from the original submitter, but they can take them off the market.
perhaps the ANA can accept these coins as donations for educational purposes. The donations can be given a tax right-off to PCGS, NGC and any other donators for full value.
The coins could then be used during summer seminar as examples of doctored coins. >>
Defining 'full value' will be a problem. If a coin is doctored, surely the IRS won't accept an improper slab grade as the basis for determining full value.
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
You can buy stamp collections at 1/10 value and donate it for full catalog value. great tax right-off there.
<< <i>What should be done with the doctored coins? I really don't know, what does PCGS do with one? Just send it back? Counterfeit coins get turned into the government right? >>
PCGS avoids having to do this by declaring counterfeits of "questionable authenticity".
There are too many guesses when it comes doctoring to decide any fate, IMO.
Lance.
<< <i>PCGS and NGC can buy the problem pieces off the market. They might be able to recoup their loss from the original submitter, but they can take them off the market.
perhaps the ANA can accept these coins as donations for educational purposes. The donations can be given a tax right-off to PCGS, NGC and any other donators for full value.
The coins could then be used during summer seminar as examples of doctored coins. >>
Please explain how PCGS and NGC can recoup the loss from the original submitter? What if the original submitter was not the coin doctor and was unaware of the problems? They simply paid for an expert opinion and guarantee, and after all, it should be the expert's loss unless they can demonstrate that the original submitter fraudulently submitted the coins. I don't think courts and juries would be very sympathetic; I'm not.
Considering the % of desirable or decent 19th century coins that have been stripped and retoned you must mean doctoring over and above even moderate to heavy color and skin alterations? That's a lot of coins.
Eric
<< <i>
<< <i>PCGS and NGC can buy the problem pieces off the market. They might be able to recoup their loss from the original submitter, but they can take them off the market.
perhaps the ANA can accept these coins as donations for educational purposes. The donations can be given a tax right-off to PCGS, NGC and any other donators for full value.
The coins could then be used during summer seminar as examples of doctored coins. >>
Please explain how PCGS and NGC can recoup the loss from the original submitter? What if the original submitter was not the coin doctor and was unaware of the problems? They simply paid for an expert opinion and guarantee, and after all, it should be the expert's loss unless they can demonstrate that the original submitter fraudulently submitted the coins. I don't think courts and juries would be very sympathetic; I'm not. >>
Exactly. No sympathy here for the TPG's. If you are an "expert" and trading on that perception for profit then it's your loss you if you are fooled.
http://macrocoins.com
<< <i>I know a lot of people don't like to admit it but there is a market for problem coins - especially for keys. >>
I guess that's partly my point, a doctored rarity is still a rarity. I would still pay decent money for a nice 1872-S quarter, even if it's been doctored, course not as much as I would if it were problem free. Problem is, you don't always know if it's been doctored or not.
I really think it would be a good idea to have the TPG's start encapsulating coins they think are doctored, but list it as "Genuine-Doctored, XF Details" or something like that. In all cases they would use the "sniffer" so the coin gets tracked, and have images available for the general public to view...keep a searchable list of the doctored coins as well, so even if the coin was cracked, you could still look up the coin.
Any doctored coin that passed through their hands would be identified (if identification were possible.) Doctoring would become much less appetizing, and would diminish. Course there are those that would still get through, it would be much more difficult though.