Crossover Results

Comments

• TennesseeDave Posts: 4,809 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 30, 2012 9:38AM

  I am wondering about the Poor details from a previous Proof 63. I have seen other posts about receiving poor details grades from obviously higher details coins. Has Don Willis ever responded to any of these threads?

  Trade $'s

  0
• Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 30, 2012 9:55AM

  
  Greetings:
  
  I just crossed a bunch of coins, however, they were all MS.
  
  Is it worth trying to cross "Almost Good to Fine coins??"
  
  I don't know.
  
  I never buy a cleaned coin, and put a stop loss on those that I try to cross.
  
  Just me.
  
  Cheers!

  0
• Bothuwui Posts: 484 ✭✭

  January 30, 2012 10:13AM

  It's worth it for me if it's for my own sets/registry. I'm not looking to upgrade or make money, I just wanted to get these coins into PCGS holders to go with the rest of my collection.

  Successful transactions with: goldman86, dmarks, CoinFame, segoja, commoncents05, wondercoin, Dabigkahuna, Levinll, RNCHSN, MrOrganic, Type2, ModernCoinMart, alohagary, BECOKA, guitarwes, rbf, fishteeth, freechance, agentjim007, PQPeace, Russ, GSAGuy

  0
• Walkerguy21D Posts: 11,664 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 30, 2012 11:04AM

  Re: the 'Poor Details' - I think someone in another thread said this refers to the points value for the coins, for reg set scoring purposes, not their impression of the technical grade, per se.

  Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug

  0
• NewParadigm Posts: 1,322

  January 30, 2012 11:07AM

  The DMPL to no designation is strange.

  0
• TwoKopeiki Posts: 9,840 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 30, 2012 11:08AM

  Great example of buying the coin and not the holder. You must have a pretty good eye.

  
  8 Reales Madness Collection
  

  0
• Bothuwui Posts: 484 ✭✭

  January 30, 2012 9:23PM

  I edited my original post. I had the original grades wrong on a couple. I pulled out my submission form and corrected them. The Morgan was originally a 64, not 65. The nickel i originall had as a AG3 was a G4 Details. I still consider it an upgrade to get it in a G4 holder.

  Successful transactions with: goldman86, dmarks, CoinFame, segoja, commoncents05, wondercoin, Dabigkahuna, Levinll, RNCHSN, MrOrganic, Type2, ModernCoinMart, alohagary, BECOKA, guitarwes, rbf, fishteeth, freechance, agentjim007, PQPeace, Russ, GSAGuy

  0
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 30, 2012 11:47PM

  Good results... you must be buying the coin and not the slab... Well done. Cheers, RickO

  0
• blu62vette Posts: 11,943 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 30, 2012 11:55PM

  
  
  << <i>The DMPL to no designation is strange. >>
  
  
  
  MY guess would be it is an attractive coin but one side has die polish limiting the PL/DMPL chances.

  http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook

  0
• Bothuwui Posts: 484 ✭✭

  January 31, 2012 6:35AM

  You are right blu62vette, the reverse is not DMPL. Reflective, but the polish lines make it look noisy.

  Successful transactions with: goldman86, dmarks, CoinFame, segoja, commoncents05, wondercoin, Dabigkahuna, Levinll, RNCHSN, MrOrganic, Type2, ModernCoinMart, alohagary, BECOKA, guitarwes, rbf, fishteeth, freechance, agentjim007, PQPeace, Russ, GSAGuy

  0
• MikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭

  January 31, 2012 6:39AM

  Congrats on your crossovers. Looks like you did very well outside of the buff and IHC!
  
  
  
  << <i>ANACS DMPL MS64 1880-S Morgan Dollar downgraded to MS64+
  ...
  ANACS G4 Details 1885 Liberty Nickel upgraded to G04 >>
  
  
  
  Isn't that an "upgrade" and a "cross"?

  Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.

  0
• lkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 31, 2012 6:47AM

  
  
  << <i>Congrats on your crossovers. Looks like you did very well outside of the buff and IHC!
  
  
  
  << <i>ANACS DMPL MS64 1880-S Morgan Dollar downgraded to MS64+
  ...
  ANACS G4 Details 1885 Liberty Nickel upgraded to G04 >>
  
  
  
  Isn't that an "upgrade" and a "cross"? >>
  
  I think the OP didn't edit the post fully. Originally the Morgan was shown as a 65 downgrading to 64+. And the nickel was originally listed as G3 upgrading to G4.
  Lance.

  Coin Photography Services / Everyman Registry set / BHNC #213

  0
• Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 31, 2012 8:13AM

  Thanks for sharing your results !!!

  Timbuk3

  0
• ModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 31, 2012 8:38AM

  
  
  << <i>Re: the 'Poor Details' - I think someone in another thread said this refers to the points value for the coins, for reg set scoring purposes, not their impression of the technical grade, per se. >>
  
  In addition to this, I believe you'll find the holders will arrive with the appropriate details grade, not PO Details.

  0
• Bothuwui Posts: 484 ✭✭

  January 31, 2012 12:57PM

  I`d still consider a 64 dmpl going to a 64 + as a downgrade, and a g4 details going to a g4 as an upgrade. What do you think?

  Successful transactions with: goldman86, dmarks, CoinFame, segoja, commoncents05, wondercoin, Dabigkahuna, Levinll, RNCHSN, MrOrganic, Type2, ModernCoinMart, alohagary, BECOKA, guitarwes, rbf, fishteeth, freechance, agentjim007, PQPeace, Russ, GSAGuy

  0
• truthteller Posts: 1,240 ✭✭

  January 31, 2012 2:12PM

  Was this a "cross at any grade" submission. If a coin doesn't cross at the same grade, isn't it a DNC?
  
  
  TRUTH

  0