Help me with this grade.

Wabbit2313 · January 28, 2012 12:02PM

How would you grade it?

1880-S SWEET!

Wabbit2313 · January 28, 2012 12:04PM

TennesseeDave · January 28, 2012 12:13PM

I would really like to see the reverse. Obverse grades 67 Dmpl is my guess.

LanceNewmanOCC · January 28, 2012 12:19PM

.
with an obverse like that it is essential to see the reverse to GTG
.

Raybo · January 28, 2012 12:20PM

I'm not a Morgan kinda person but this coin is SWEET!

tightbudget · January 28, 2012 12:34PM

Without seeing the reverse, I'd say 67PL. DMPL wouldn't surprise me though.

robertpr · January 28, 2012 1:36PM

Guys there's no way that's a 67. Of course, without seeing the reverse, it's IMPOSSIBLE to grade the coin but that being said, there are hits on the cheek. Nice strike not perfect but very good. A lot of frost breaks too maybe from stacking or something who knows. I'd say 65 with a downside risk of 64 on a really bad day. Of course, DMPL based on the image too.

coindeuce · January 28, 2012 1:42PM

MS-67, if the back is as pristine as the front. Frost breaks on the cheek are minimal.

BST transactions: Even a few with OFR members. Imagine that.
Ahrensdad,al410,ao39,Bajjerfan,Barndog,Batman23,Billet7,Blackhawk,
Braddick,Broadstruck,brokezorro,CarsonCityGold,cohodk,CoinsAreNeat,Coinlearner,coinman23885,
CoinRaritiesOnline,coin22lover,cucamongacoin,
DCW,dizzyfoxx,donthehill,DoubleEagle59,dpvilla,Drunner,dsessom,Ducky1100,
EvilEmpire,eyoung429,fishteeth,greencopper,grip,habaraca,Hendrixkat,holeinone1972,
icsoccer,indiananationals,jakeblue,JamesM,jhdfla,Joebb21,JonathanB,Kalshacon,
Keets,kryptonitecomics,KSteelheader,Lakesamman,LasVegasTeddy,LeeG,
LucyBop,mach19,MadMarty,MANOFCOINS,Manorcourtman,Meltdown,MisterTicToc,
**nesvt/wipoto**,Nocerino18,Numisma,oldwestgold,oreville,papabear,PreTurb,RedHerring,
rlarick,Rob41281,Robb,robkool,RPMHunter,RTS,SoCalBigMark,SeaEagleCoins,steelielee,Stone,sToner,
smittys,sumrytym,TexasNationals,thebigeng,tydye,TWQG,USmoneylover,
Walkerguy21D,WinLoseWin,wondercoin

DennisH · January 28, 2012 1:51PM

66PL.
Too many frost breaks in the hair for 67, IMO. Too much frost and/or flow lines in the fields for DMPL.

Raybo · January 28, 2012 2:03PM

<< Guys there's no way that's a 67. Of course, without seeing the reverse, it's IMPOSSIBLE to grade the coin but that being said, there are hits on the cheek. Nice strike not perfect but very good. A lot of frost breaks too maybe from stacking or something who knows. I'd say 65 with a downside risk of 64 on a really bad day. Of course, DMPL based on the image too. >>

64 by just looking at the obverse?
67 all day long by the obverse (may haps 66 on a bad day) and maybe a different ball game seeing the reverse.

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 5:22AM

Here is the reverse.

Steve27 · January 29, 2012 5:36AM

Are you sure that's the reverse? The obverse appears to be of a coin in a 2x2 and the reverse is a coin in a GSA holder. In any case I would say MS66.

robkool · January 29, 2012 6:05AM

MS66PL...

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 6:08AM

<< Are you sure that's the reverse? The obverse appears to be of a coin in a 2x2 and the reverse is a coin in a GSA holder. In any case I would say MS66. >>

WOOPS! Clicked the wrong picture!! LOL

stealer · January 29, 2012 6:09AM

65 with a shot at 66.

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 6:11AM

<< Are you sure that's the reverse? The obverse appears to be of a coin in a 2x2 and the reverse is a coin in a GSA holder. In any case I would say MS66. >>

I sure wish it was a "CC"!!!!!!!

coinkid855 · January 29, 2012 6:11AM

65+ That reverse holds it back, unfortunately. But that obverse is super nice!!!

-Paul

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 6:16AM

<< 65+ That reverse holds it back, unfortunately. But that obverse is super nice!!!

-Paul >>

If that's a 65, my current 65's must be 62's or less! Do you really have a 65 without a single mark on the cheek? I'll buy it sight unseen! LOL Again!

ricko · January 29, 2012 6:34AM

MS65.... Cheers, RickO

HighRelief · January 29, 2012 6:37AM

Another one of those one sided 1880-S DMPL Morgan's.

I would give it MS64+ with a CAC sticker

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 7:59AM

Rough crowd here! MS-64? COME ON!

I will buy any and all of your self graded coins at 64 or 65 price all day long folks! (As long as you grade them the same as this one!!!)

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 8:42AM

Here is the grade.

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 8:44AM

The 64-66 grades are rediculous. I saw the PCGS MS-69 PL coin, and it did nothing like this! Not for me anyway! HAHA.

DCW · January 29, 2012 8:46AM

Not my series, but I have to believe that is better than 65. Look at that cheek!

TexasNationals · January 29, 2012 8:47AM

65 here also

Bochiman · January 29, 2012 8:47AM

<< The 64-66 grades are rediculous. I saw the PCGS MS-69 PL coin, and it did nothing like this! Not for me anyway! HAHA. >>

Actually, they are not ridiculous. They are grades from a photo, not inhand.
Grading from photos is not perfect and many things can appear, or not appear, to be happening to the coin in an image.

DCW · January 29, 2012 8:47AM

Man, grade revealed while I pondered. Snooze and lose, great coin!

Wabbit2313 · January 29, 2012 8:54AM

<< 

<< The 64-66 grades are rediculous. I saw the PCGS MS-69 PL coin, and it did nothing like this! Not for me anyway! HAHA. >>

Actually, they are not ridiculous. They are grades from a photo, not inhand.
Grading from photos is not perfect and many things can appear, or not appear, to be happening to the coin in an image. >>

Seriously?

Now that you see the grade??? That's an older holder to boot.

How could ANYONE grade that 64-65?

Pictures are also good I think???

tradedollarnut · January 29, 2012 9:34AM

From the image, it appears the lower cheek and neck were thumbed prior to submission. But who knows what it looks like in hand.

coinkat · January 29, 2012 10:59AM

There is something a tad off with the overall look- TDN could easily be right- an in hand review is really required

coinkid855 · January 29, 2012 1:40PM

This is why you can't grade from a picture!

-Paul

stealer · January 29, 2012 1:45PM

<< 

<< 

<< The 64-66 grades are rediculous. I saw the PCGS MS-69 PL coin, and it did nothing like this! Not for me anyway! HAHA. >>

Actually, they are not ridiculous. They are grades from a photo, not inhand.
Grading from photos is not perfect and many things can appear, or not appear, to be happening to the coin in an image. >>

Seriously?

Now that you see the grade??? That's an older holder to boot.

How could ANYONE grade that 64-65?

Pictures are also good I think??? >>

We're just giving honest opinions, no need to get feisty.

If you don't want to hear opinions like this I would suggest not posting guess the grade threads.

metalmeister · January 29, 2012 2:00PM

Frosty! I would have said 66

coindeuce · January 29, 2012 2:40PM

<< This is why you can't grade from a picture!

-Paul >>

But...but...I did! And I nailed it!

BST transactions: Even a few with OFR members. Imagine that.
Ahrensdad,al410,ao39,Bajjerfan,Barndog,Batman23,Billet7,Blackhawk,
Braddick,Broadstruck,brokezorro,CarsonCityGold,cohodk,CoinsAreNeat,Coinlearner,coinman23885,
CoinRaritiesOnline,coin22lover,cucamongacoin,
DCW,dizzyfoxx,donthehill,DoubleEagle59,dpvilla,Drunner,dsessom,Ducky1100,
EvilEmpire,eyoung429,fishteeth,greencopper,grip,habaraca,Hendrixkat,holeinone1972,
icsoccer,indiananationals,jakeblue,JamesM,jhdfla,Joebb21,JonathanB,Kalshacon,
Keets,kryptonitecomics,KSteelheader,Lakesamman,LasVegasTeddy,LeeG,
LucyBop,mach19,MadMarty,MANOFCOINS,Manorcourtman,Meltdown,MisterTicToc,
**nesvt/wipoto**,Nocerino18,Numisma,oldwestgold,oreville,papabear,PreTurb,RedHerring,
rlarick,Rob41281,Robb,robkool,RPMHunter,RTS,SoCalBigMark,SeaEagleCoins,steelielee,Stone,sToner,
smittys,sumrytym,TexasNationals,thebigeng,tydye,TWQG,USmoneylover,
Walkerguy21D,WinLoseWin,wondercoin

Wabbit2313 · January 30, 2012 10:22AM

Do we really think NGC graded a "Doctored" coin MS-67* ?????

Come on.

I know this is PCGS site, but they are not that terrible. THUMBING???? MS-67?????????

If so, we are all DOOMED!

Help me with this grade.

Comments

Leave a Comment