Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Fireball Toned Morgans - If you got'em, Post 'em.

Well, I don't actually have this one anymore but one of the coolest I have seen. Some textile on it to boot.

I wanna see your best. Come on AB and Lloyd. image

image
Brandon Kelley - ANA - 972.746.9193 - http://www.bestofyesterdaycollectibles.com

Comments

  • Options
    relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,286 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow, that is nice!!! Too bad it's not in 5 holder with a gold bean, it would probably be worth a couple hundred G's. image
    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • Options
    SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,125 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Holy crap Brandon that toner is insane!
  • Options
    dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    Here is one with a little bit of fire to it:


    image
  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,150 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PCGS MS63 due to marks, but still my favorite I own.
    image
  • Options
    coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,515 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've got some furball toned Morgans, but I doubt you want to see them here. image

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com

  • Options
    bestclser1bestclser1 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    Well Brandon as i thought it was one of the best when i owned it too,toning breaks made me sell it,and the glow-worm i sold to Larry Shapiro were special too.This next one i LOVE!
    Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
  • Options
    bestclser1bestclser1 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    image
    Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great pics of a sweet looking Morgan as I love the pull away on the obverse/reverse patina. image

    I have a newly found greater appreciation for high grade textiles, now knowing how close in proximity to dangerous gnawing rodents they where! image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,650 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>PCGS MS63 due to marks, but still my favorite I own.
    image >>



    Honestly, i wouldnt be so sure it was only due to the marks...
  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,150 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is too much fun.
    Is it OK to post another? If not, my apology. if so, here is a raw Morgan I picked up and sent to PCGS. Graded MS64 (a bit surprising. I thought it would only go MS63):
    image
  • Options
    UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Picked all three of these up last year, raw, two from the same roll.

    image
    image
    image
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,650 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>This is too much fun.
    Is it OK to post another? If not, my apology. if so, here is a raw Morgan I picked up and sent to PCGS. Graded MS64 (a bit surprising. I thought it would only go MS63):
    image >>



    See - my point exactly! They rewarded the color in this instance , penalized it in the other.
  • Options
    stealerstealer Posts: 4,039 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>This is too much fun.
    Is it OK to post another? If not, my apology. if so, here is a raw Morgan I picked up and sent to PCGS. Graded MS64 (a bit surprising. I thought it would only go MS63):
    image >>



    See - my point exactly! They rewarded the color in this instance , penalized it in the other. >>


    Hm, but both seem equally attractive unless you're suggesting the 63 is questionably MA?
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am indeed
  • Options
    dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>This is too much fun.
    Is it OK to post another? If not, my apology. if so, here is a raw Morgan I picked up and sent to PCGS. Graded MS64 (a bit surprising. I thought it would only go MS63):
    image >>



    See - my point exactly! They rewarded the color in this instance , penalized it in the other. >>


    Hm, but both seem equally attractive unless you're suggesting the 63 is questionably MA? >>













    This one looks like it had a little help along the way.....JMO of course.
  • Options
    dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>PCGS MS63 due to marks, but still my favorite I own.
    image >>



    Honestly, i wouldnt be so sure it was only due to the marks... >>












    Now this one,well.............. JMO of course.
  • Options
    SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,598 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    AuroraBorealisAuroraBorealis Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice fireball colors poorguy! Fireball colors are VERY tough to find and was fortunate to come up with these...

    AB image

    "Magma"
    image
    image
    "Fireball"
    image
    image
    "Textile Tennis Racket"
    image
    image
    "Fire And Ice"
    image
    image
  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,150 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ^
    I've been hunting for a Textile for a little over six months with no success!
    Those are outstanding.

    And... the hunt continues. . .
  • Options
    This is the closest coin that I have. It's a little more subtle, but still has vivid coloration. The coin, in a rattler holder, was recently photographed by Todd Pollock (BluCC Photos).

    image
    "Clamorous for Coin"
  • Options
    BarberianBarberian Posts: 4,643 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>This is too much fun.
    Is it OK to post another? If not, my apology. if so, here is a raw Morgan I picked up and sent to PCGS. Graded MS64 (a bit surprising. I thought it would only go MS63):
    image >>



    See - my point exactly! They rewarded the color in this instance , penalized it in the other. >>



    What about the difference in strike quality?
  • Options
    airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My most intense:

    image
    image
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,650 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>
    What about the difference in strike quality? >>



    PCGS barely notices strike on Morgans in the 63/64 range. Strike is about 5th on the priority list when grading classic coins.
  • Options
    BarberianBarberian Posts: 4,643 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>
    What about the difference in strike quality? >>



    PCGS barely notices strike on Morgans in the 63/64 range. Strike is about 5th on the priority list when grading classic coins. >>



    Besides surface marks and luster, what else is considered in grading classic coins ahead of strike quality?
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,642 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>PCGS MS63 due to marks, but still my favorite I own.
    image >>



    Honestly, i wouldnt be so sure it was only due to the marks... >>




    Is that some neatass die clashing by her mouth?
    theknowitalltroll;
  • Options
    bestclser1bestclser1 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    Textile?No problemimage
    Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
  • Options
    bestclser1bestclser1 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    Fire in the sky!image
    Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
  • Options
    poorguypoorguy Posts: 4,317
    Braddick, what are your thoughts on how those two Morgans you shared toned?
    Brandon Kelley - ANA - 972.746.9193 - http://www.bestofyesterdaycollectibles.com
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,642 ✭✭✭✭✭
    All I got.

    Iridescent fireball.

    image

    image

    image
    theknowitalltroll;
  • Options
    JJMJJM Posts: 8,128 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Little burnt around the edges image

    Now resides in a PCGS holder

    imageimage
    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly, justindan
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,650 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>
    What about the difference in strike quality? >>



    PCGS barely notices strike on Morgans in the 63/64 range. Strike is about 5th on the priority list when grading classic coins. >>



    Besides surface marks and luster, what else is considered in grading classic coins ahead of strike quality? >>



    In my experience:

    1) surface frost/sheen on devices
    2) luster
    3) overall eye appeal
    4) bagmarks
    5) hairlines, rub, etc

    THEN strike.
  • Options
    thank you tdn.

    it is posts like this that makes this forum great.

    image
    my ebay items BST transactions/swaps/giveaways with: Tiny, raycyca,mrpaseo, Dollar2007,Whatafind, Boom, packers88, DBSTrader2, 19Lyds, Mar327, pontiacinf, ElmerFusterpuck.
  • Options

    Picked this one up tonight off the bay. Should be a nice one. I really think it's NT. PCI slab


    image
  • Options


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>
    What about the difference in strike quality? >>



    PCGS barely notices strike on Morgans in the 63/64 range. Strike is about 5th on the priority list when grading classic coins. >>



    Besides surface marks and luster, what else is considered in grading classic coins ahead of strike quality? >>



    In my experience:

    1) surface frost/sheen on devices
    2) luster
    3) overall eye appeal
    4) bagmarks
    5) hairlines, rub, etc

    THEN strike. >>

    Eye appeal is subjective so it should not factor in. Thats why PCGS has no real standards and its all a shell game. Each grader has differnt ideas as to the eye appeal of a given coin. image
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,650 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>
    What about the difference in strike quality? >>



    PCGS barely notices strike on Morgans in the 63/64 range. Strike is about 5th on the priority list when grading classic coins. >>



    Besides surface marks and luster, what else is considered in grading classic coins ahead of strike quality? >>



    In my experience:

    1) surface frost/sheen on devices
    2) luster
    3) overall eye appeal
    4) bagmarks
    5) hairlines, rub, etc

    THEN strike. >>

    Eye appeal is subjective so it should not factor in. Thats why PCGS has no real standards and its all a shell game. Each grader has differnt ideas as to the eye appeal of a given coin. image >>



    The basics of eye appeal are not subjective. Vibrant toning beats dark toning. Electric blue is always attractive. Periphrial toning with light centers are a plus. Just because a few object, doesn't mean that the market doesn't predominantly appreciate certain looks.
  • Options
    ElmerFusterpuckElmerFusterpuck Posts: 4,901 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hopefully these can count:

    One of my best looking MS-62's

    image

    Fire and ice:

    image
  • Options
    nwcoastnwcoast Posts: 2,905 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's one....
    It's a bit banged up but the colors are worth sharing.
    image

    Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014

  • Options
    nwcoastnwcoast Posts: 2,905 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's another......
    image

    Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file