,,,

SeattleSlammer · January 23, 2012 11:07AM

No cheating for those that may have seen it posted elsewhere.

Unknown · January 23, 2012 11:13AM

This content has been removed.

stealer · January 23, 2012 11:13AM

MS62 looks about right...albeit it could be wear on the cheek?

blu62vette · January 23, 2012 11:15AM

I would guess but that would be cheating. Great looking coin!

DRUNNER · January 23, 2012 11:16AM

The cheek has the look of rub but I am going to guess that is a photo imperfection. Color is outstanding . . . originality is superb . . . I am going with MS63 as I don't think that cheek area is rub. It'd be too obvious.

Drunner
(Doily???)

Goldbully · January 23, 2012 11:21AM

Really beautiful quarter, David!!!

MS62

LotsoLuck · January 23, 2012 11:37AM

Thats one of those coins where grade is secondary

SeattleSlammer · January 23, 2012 11:38AM

coinsarefun · January 23, 2012 11:42AM

I really don't care about the grade.
It's beautiful

Buzzybest · January 23, 2012 11:43AM

<< Hint: no hints! >>

Ok,the last discs that I remember playing were 45 rpms. So I'm guesssing an EF-45.

TPRC · January 23, 2012 11:46AM

Very, very nice. I'll guess 64.

JupitarCoins · January 23, 2012 11:58AM

<< 

<< Hint: no hints! >>

Ok,the last discs that I remember playing were 45 rpms. So I'm guesssing an EF-45. >>

Way off its a ms60 or 62

SeattleSlammer · January 23, 2012 11:59AM

Don't forget that in real life it's just a tiny disc.....not a dinner plate.

DNADave · January 23, 2012 12:01PM

I think it looks like a 64

stealer · January 23, 2012 12:04PM

<< Don't forget that in real life it's just a tiny disc.....not a dinner plate.

>>

I thought you said no hints?

joebb21 · January 23, 2012 12:09PM

I go 55

bestclser1 · January 23, 2012 12:11PM

AU58

SeattleSlammer · January 23, 2012 12:23PM

Nobody here should put in an application at PCGS, or CAC.

joebb21 · January 23, 2012 12:24PM

<< AU58 >>

Thats a good man.
Looks like its just you and I believe the coin is AU.

As rumors Im hearing are saying my guess was way way off, for the sake up this game I will say 65+ with a possible 66

GoldClause · January 23, 2012 12:26PM

64

bestclser1 · January 23, 2012 12:40PM

Sure,65 why not.

stealer · January 23, 2012 12:42PM

I'm going back to my original guess that it's AU58...although rumors have it I'm wrong

Billet7 · January 23, 2012 12:43PM

58

SeattleSlammer · January 23, 2012 12:51PM

If PCGS and CAC told you that there was no rub, would you believe them?

DRUNNER · January 23, 2012 12:54PM

OK . .at some point . . post the grade . .

Drunner

Shamika · January 23, 2012 1:05PM

65

SeattleSlammer · January 23, 2012 1:08PM

Thanks for playing!

melvin289 · January 23, 2012 1:15PM

Very nice attractive coin SeattleSlammer.

Ron

SeattleSlammer · January 23, 2012 11:58PM

Tuesday bump for those early to bed east coasters.

MFH · January 24, 2012 1:42AM

Very attractive coin !

You make it ? or a NEWP in the holder ?

Meltdown · January 24, 2012 1:45AM

That is pretty!

relicsncoins · January 24, 2012 1:58AM

My first thought before seeing the grade was 65. Does a sticker add any value to + graded coin? The + already denotes that the coin is in the top 20% for that grade and therefore solid for the grade.

SeattleSlammer · January 24, 2012 2:20AM

Relicsncoins, I'm wondering whether the green bean in this case means that CAC agrees with the + or if it just means that they agree with the 64. In one case it would mean that they think the coin is high end (64.8-ish) and in the other it would mean that they agree it's solid for the grade (64.5-ish). It's a distinction that I don't think has been discussed before regarding CAC's review of + coins.....or has it?

Either way it's just one of those geeky things we collectors get to ponder.

relicsncoins · January 24, 2012 2:28AM

<< Relicsncoins, I'm wondering whether the green bean in this case means that CAC agrees with the + or if it just means that they agree with the 64. In one case it would mean that they think the coin is high end (64.8-ish) and in the other it would mean that they agree it's solid for the grade (64.5-ish). It's a distinction that I don't think has been discussed before regarding CAC's review of + coins.....or has it?

Either way it's just one of those geeky things we collectors get to ponder.

>>

It's a good question. I thought I read on these boards, that CAC does not consider the + when awarding the sticker, but I don't know for sure.

Lakesammman · January 24, 2012 9:16AM

Missed seeing the coin last night - VERY nice.

Bochiman · January 24, 2012 9:37AM

I like it! And, I could count the number of barber coins that I really like on less than 1 hand...but I like this one!

,,,

Comments

Leave a Comment