Home U.S. Coin Forum

Is this a cud error? PMD? I'm stumped.

This is an odd looking cud if it is not PMD. It would seem that the rim looks right for a cud but where the extra metal is, the rim for that area has been deformed and sports a "plateau" like bend. If you look at the reverse where the cud is on the other side, you see like a struck-thru grease error but it seems to have files lines within it? Do you think someone added metal to it (only way it'd be PMD I guess) or is it a legit cud? Thanks ahead of time

image


image


image


image


image


image

Comments

  • commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭
    Cud. No doubt about it.

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭
    A cud is a break of the die, meaning there is nothing left to apply the design to the blank, and that also means there is nothing left for the opposite to to press against. That is why there is the soft spot in the design on the reverse. Here is an extreme example:

    image
    image

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • 2 cuds in 2 months... I'm on a roll image
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>2 cuds in 2 months... I'm on a roll image >>



    Just remember 3 cuds and your out
    So don't swing at the low ones...
    image
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"


  • << <i>It would seem that the rim looks right for a cud but where the extra metal is, the rim for that area has been deformed and sports a "plateau" like bend. >>



    That "bend" on the rim is normal for a cud.

    Here's one I found a few years ago from roll searching that shows that "bend." I donated it to atarian for his die chip project.

    image

    image
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I believe this is something else since the 'cud' appears over top of already struck letters... no suggestions as to how though. Perhaps Fred Weinberg can review this... Cheers, RickO
  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,733 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Definitely a cud, the marks on the reverse are usually flattened out by the force of the strike.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,753 ✭✭✭✭✭
    OP: when you talk about the bend of the rim, are you talking about the "rim" (the raised border about either side that is a part of the obverse or reverse design), or the "edge" (the flat third side of a cent, where you would balance a cent on its edge)?

    The edge of the coin has a wave in it because the metal in the planchet at the affected area flowed into the path of least resistance (the large void in the obverse die) rather than the narrow rim in the reverse die. Thus, the reverse rim is weak opposite the cud.

    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a cud, and a nice one. The deformation is normal and seen on many if not most similar pieces to varying degrees.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • I've been searching penny rolls for awhile and have seen maybe one or two of these coins and have not paid any attention to them because I thought that they were caused by kids playing around with the coin, or that the splits were from super glue (which could be the case).

    So my question is that from the tone of this thread cuds are mint errors? Right? And if they are do they have any numismatic value in and of themselves or are they just a curiousity?

    Just trying to get information.............
    Successful BST with Nolawyer, Whitetornado, Messydesk, whit, lasvegasteddy,cohodk,allcoinsrule, watersport, blackhawk, tonedase, PRoemisch
  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,733 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I've been searching penny rolls for awhile and have seen maybe one or two of these coins and have not paid any attention to them because I thought that they were caused by kids playing around with the coin, or that the splits were from super glue (which could be the case).

    So my question is that from the tone of this thread cuds are mint errors? Right? And if they are do they have any numismatic value in and of themselves or are they just a curiousity?

    Just trying to get information............. >>




    Yes they are Mint errors, caused when a piece of the die breaks off and the planchet is unstruck in the area of the missing die. Because a broken die will not stay in service for long before a complete failure, they are considered scarce and highly collectible. There are a lot of forms of PMD that resemble cuds, especially when metal or glue is on the surface, but this thread does a good job of reviewing the diagnostics of a genuine error.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file