Really need to know if these Jeffersons are AT or NT?

TexasNationals · December 26, 2011 10:05AM

I think they are AT'ed and poorly done at that but need a few experts to chime in

uno

dos

silverpop · December 26, 2011 10:16AM

i'm not seeing anything that would yell AT they look NT to me

JamesMurray · December 26, 2011 10:28AM

While it's difficult to say with the subtleness of the toning on the nickels , i did as the seller suggested and checked his feedback , the walking liberty monster toners were enough to have me thinking i'd pass. The bid end prices seem to support that.

Shamika · December 26, 2011 10:54AM

Looks like slightly circulated Jeffersons that have been sitting in a cardboard coin holder for a few decades.

BigDowgie · December 26, 2011 11:53AM

AT identification is not one of my specialties, but looking at some of the other coins this dealer has sold seems like a few others happen to have a similar look. With that said, I'm surprised the ebay feedback is 100%?

Peacemonkey · December 26, 2011 1:10PM

The photogrpahy reminds me of Chameleon coins for some reason.

Lehigh96 · December 26, 2011 1:35PM

I don't see anything that would make me think they are AT. My biggest problem is the unusual lighting technique used by the photographer. I just have an eery feeling the seller is trying to hide something, but I don't know what. Based on what you paid, I see very little downside, and a very acceptable risk.

magikbilly · December 26, 2011 1:45PM

Hi

To my eye, it could be the photography, but I'd pass on those were they offered to me. My .02

Best,
Eric

CarlWohlforth · December 26, 2011 1:54PM

Uno might have been helped along a bit. Or a combo of cardboard holders and photography. From what I see it isn't full steps.

Dos looks natural, there isn't much color at all anyway. Strike worse than uno and no full steps in my book.

Type2 · December 26, 2011 2:33PM

Lets just say.

1St

2nd

And you know the next stop....

WoodenJefferson · December 26, 2011 3:22PM

dos looks natural
neon colors on uno do not look natural, but they may very well be.

morgandollar1878 · December 26, 2011 4:08PM

No bells going off in my head that says they are AT.

ricko · December 26, 2011 9:22PM

I have seen Jeffs like uno still in mint cello.... however, based on things I have done, those colors are easily achieved. May or may not be AT... Cheers, RickO

kryptonitecomics · December 26, 2011 11:19PM

I vote NT on those....nothing jumps out at me based on the colors and quantity of the toning.

MikeInFL · December 27, 2011 5:21AM

AT/NT? I'll leave that up to those with crystal balls.

I'll go MA.

Lehigh96 · December 27, 2011 9:49AM

<< <i>AT/NT? I'll leave that up to those with crystal balls.

I'll go MA. >>

+1

coinman420 · December 27, 2011 10:23AM

the brilliant blue on uno turns me off. most jeffs i have that are toned are a more pastel color. light blue and/or gold in varied shades but not bright blue. .999 silver tones like that and sometimes 90% tones bright blue but not nickel. JMO

edit to add coin dos reverse at 12:00 has the pastel blue that looks natural. coin uno the blue looks different.

bolivarshagnasty · December 27, 2011 11:41AM

TN, Don't see anything that immediately turns me off. Best viewed in hand. At those prices, if you get one or both in full step holders you have done well. Nice picking!!! Shag

Really need to know if these Jeffersons are AT or NT?

Comments

Leave a Comment