Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Partial Clad Layer Error and What Else?

MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 2,093 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just picked this up and I'm looking to sell it, but I want to know everything that is going on with it first.
Is there anything else besides missing a partial clad layer? There is an area of missing detail where the mintmark should be and I'm not exactly sure what it is.
I'm pretty sure it is genuine but if you disagree, please let me know.
Thanks and happy holidays.


image

Comments

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Partial clad layer and defective planchet.
  • Options
    MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 2,093 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the quick reply. I thought this might be it, but the damage just seemed too straight.
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,012 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Something was struck deeply into the coin where the indent is. Notice how the reverse rim opposite that area is very strong, caused by the extra thickness of metal there during the strike.

    The indent may well have been caused by the missing clad material getting folded over to that area and bunching up prior to the strike. All things considered, I would consider this a very unusual error.

    TD
    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    seanqseanq Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Something was struck deeply into the coin where the indent is. Notice how the reverse rim opposite that area is very strong, caused by the extra thickness of metal there during the strike.

    The indent may well have been caused by the missing clad material getting folded over to that area and bunching up prior to the strike. All things considered, I would consider this a very unusual error.

    TD >>



    I think Tom nailed it, notice how strong the strike is opposite the indent on the reverse and how square the rim is from the added striking pressure. The extra metal could have fallen off well after the strike. I agree that it is very unusual and very cool.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Options
    astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with Tom and Sean.
    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Interesting error coin.. do not recall one quite like it... Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 2,093 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the replies.
    I didn't see that area of strong details until I looked at the pictures again.
    Being that the struck through area is so straight, it would make sense that it was struck through
    a bit of the clad layer. Again, I appreciate the help.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file