Options
Some More Barber Quarters--Grades Please
Earlier this week, I asked everyone to grade my 1897 Barber Quarter. Most members voted MS64/65. The photo below shows 8 AU/BU Barber Quarters from my Dansco collection including the 1897. Please give me your opinion on the grades of these coins. Comments will be helpful as well. For example, will the rim ding cause a genuine grade for the 1892? Will any bag for improper cleaning?








I do feel the need to state that I already know that all of these coins have been dipped at some point in their history and was aware of that when I purchased them.
Thanks for your time!








I do feel the need to state that I already know that all of these coins have been dipped at some point in their history and was aware of that when I purchased them.
Thanks for your time!
<a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://stores.ebay.com/Lehigh-Coins">LEHIGH COINS on E-Bay
0
Comments
1892 = 63
1892-O = 63/64
1894-O = AU-53, net graded, if not bodybagged
1900 = MS-61/AU-58
1903 = MS-62
1911 = MS-63
1912 = MS-63
1892-O = MS62 or Genuine. Obverse has possible surface issues; may be just the photo, but I'm not seeing full BU luster.
1894-O = Genuine; AU50 details, but cleaning is too obvious.
1900 = AU58
1903 = MS62
1911 = MS62
1912 = MS62
1894-o may be gennie due to pin holes...
Also 1900 would gennie due to old cleaning IMO
62
55
harshly cleaned, net 30
58
60
60
62
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
63
either a PL 64 or a dipped out Genuine
cleaned
58
63
64
63
I am somewhat suspect about the 1900 Philadelphia issue.
Looks like it may have been cleaned. My friend Todd is very
harsh on the 1894-O - I would guest mate it as AU 53, at best.
Otherwise, I agree with the two posts above, not a MS in the group
and most in the 55 area. Still, not a bad group and I wouldn't worry
about the 1892-Philadelphia issue, it's a bad rim knock, but it should
still grade - as a 55.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
<< <i>I am somewhat suspect about the 1900 Philadelphia issue.
Looks like it may have been cleaned. My friend Todd is very
harsh on the 1894-O - I would guest mate it as AU 53, at best.
Otherwise, I agree with the two posts above, not a MS in the group
and most in the 55 area. Still, not a bad group and I wouldn't worry
about the 1892-Philadelphia issue, it's a bad rim knock, but it should
still grade - as a 55. >>
Okay, you guys have now confused me. Are you saying that there is legitimate wear on the cheek of all of the coins or that they will silently net grade to AU as a result of overdipping?
@ Darktone, I bought them all from different places.
before making judgement.
roadrunner
Lehigh96,
Stop by Holsonbake Numismatics table [ # unknown at the present ] if you are coming to FUN.
There will be a display of nice AU Barber Quarters for you to examine and compare to your coins.
Looking forward to meeting you.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases