GTG 1904-O Morgan PCGS
golfer72
Posts: 3,588
0
golfer72
Posts: 3,588
golfer72
Posts: 3,588
Comments
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Appears to have PL properties, need a reverse pic though.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Could be au58 to ms66 to Genuine, so I guess I'm 'out' on this one.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
What do I win?
<< <i>The pic taken at that 'reflective' angle makes it very dfficult to grade.
Could be au58 to ms66 to Genuine, so I guess I'm 'out' on this one. >>
Me too.
"If the grade don`t fit, you must resubmit"
<< <i>62 seems too low.
"If the grade don`t fit, you must resubmit"
I dont submit coins. I do buy them though. I paid 64 money for the coin.
<< <i>I agree ms62 seems low but it is in an ogh so that could answer that aspect. But seriously without a reverse pic this thread is just wasting the op's effort, the answer coul dbe with the reverse or with a better pic of the obv or both. >>
As i said the reverse is the same as the obverse. Both sides are semi PL. If this is a 62 throw everything you think you know about grading out the window!
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
62!? Wow.
<< <i>Pictures taken at that angle hide flaws and make grading nearly impossible... >>
The picture is a good representation of the coin. I would not post it if it was not.
<< <i>From that pic alone my first thought was 66/67.
62!? Wow. >>
I remember buying the coin at Coinfest. It pretty much jumped out of the case at me.
bob
<< <i>Its graded MS-62 if you can believe it. One of the cleanest Morgans I have ever seen. The picture is a good representation of the coin. Its in an OGH. >>
Two possible explanations come to mind(or combination there of):
1) coin is seriously undergraded (looks MS65/66 from image)
2) luster is muted and coin is net graded due to too much perceived time in dip
In any case, this is one for some experts to look at in hand to see if it worth resubmitting. MS65 is about where that game pays off. Misses by three grades do happen, but they tend to be 1-in-1000 longshots, so I would have some expert(s) look at it in hand before playing the game.
<< <i>
<< <i>62 seems too low.
"If the grade don`t fit, you must resubmit"
I dont submit coins. I do buy them though. I paid 64 money for the coin. >>
Paying 64 money for a Morgan like that isn`t out of line...Does look clean for a 62 with those images...
AB
<< <i>Why do you say that? The grade has already been posted.
Why, because I guessed the grade. Didn't look for the grade to be posted. I followed directions.
Now, I see no cartwheel nor mirrors and thus thought it was a horrible dip job.
There,
bob