My first toned Morgan - AT or not?.

Comments

• Bear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭

  August 20, 2002 2:23PM

  Russ - I am no expert on this, but it looks like a 3 dollar bill.

  There once was a place called
  Camelot

  0
• TomB Posts: 22,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

  August 20, 2002 2:28PM

  I'm sorry but I don't really like it and think it AU also.

  Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography
  
  In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
  
  

  0
• Russ Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭

  August 20, 2002 2:32PM

  Tom,
  
  Nothing to be sorry about, I think it's ugly. I only grabbed it for photo practice.
  
  Russ, NCNE

  eBay consignment sales | | Collectibles from Resco CCC

  0
• MastaHanky Posts: 933 ✭

  August 20, 2002 2:32PM

  I can't tell if it's AT or not, but it doesn't look right. The color progression is...weird. Especially on the reverse, where it almost looks like it was painted on. I don't know if it's the picture ot not, but it also looks like it may have been cleaned or whizzed, and I think it may be slightly circulated, too.

  0
• Bear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭

  August 20, 2002 2:36PM

  Russ - When a coin gets to look like that, would it be OK to just shoot it.

  There once was a place called
  Camelot

  0
• Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭

  August 20, 2002 3:03PM

  I hope you don't get offended or your feelings hurt but since you asked..........I think it's a MS60 that has been in a coin envelope for a while. Some people might call that original and some might call that AT but I think PCGS would NG it since it's not obvious bag or album tone. Other than that funky blue & purple place on rev nothing really screams out AT. It's not a bad looking coin but I see where people that specialize in toned coins like TomB wouldn't find it attractive.

  Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.

  0
• prooflike Posts: 3,879 ✭✭

  August 20, 2002 3:06PM

  From the images, it looks really flat too, no luster is coming through...
  
  

  ---

  

  0