Options
Shoot out at the commem corral-----stunning
Stunning auction results at Stacks-Bowers.......Monster toned commems are alive and well. These were awesome and I'm glad I got a chance to view them. MJ
Hugo 66 $34,500 40X sheet
Alabama 65 $28,750 25 X sheet
Missouri 64+ $18,400
Rhode Island 67+ $16,100
Hugo 66 $34,500 40X sheet
Alabama 65 $28,750 25 X sheet
Missouri 64+ $18,400
Rhode Island 67+ $16,100
Walker Proof Digital Album
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
0
Comments
I'm very happy with this Alabama for much less:
<< <i>how about just nicely toned commems? >>
In my opinion, that is really all those above are.
<< <i>
<< <i>how about just nicely toned commems? >>
In my opinion, that is really all those above are. >>
Hugo's, Alabama's, Missouri's and RI's are extremely difficult commems to come by with attractive toning as these prices realized may suggest. I think the Alabama, Missouri and Hugo pictured in the OP post maybe in the top 2-5% for their respective issues. MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
- Jim
I had an agent snag lot #1216 out of the Guttag Collection for me.
(one of you computer smart brothers link it up for me, please)
For the Hugo 43 are graded higher with hundreds in the same grade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the Alabama 2x2 there are 88 graded higher and hundreds in the same grade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the Missouri there are 277 graded higher!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is INSANE!
A FOOL AND HIS MONEY.....
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
<< <i>Stunning auction results at Stacks-Bowers.......Monster toned commems are alive and well. These were awesome and I'm glad I got a chance to view them. MJ
Hugo 66 $34,500 40X sheet
>>
Pretty coin but due to the several nicks on the bust on the right, I question the MS66 grading.
For example I was bidding on a coin in the pre auction, it sold on the floor to Bob Campell ,which at the time I did not know. When I got to the show I saw the coin
in a case at his table. I informed him that I was the under bidder from the internet and that if I saw the coin in person I would havew bid much higher as it was a
wonderful looking coin. He won the coin for $2000 one bid over mine on the net. Bob told me he was prepared to go to $4000 for the coin as he felt it was really neat
and those this is why he quoted me $4600 for the coin, Passed but boy I wish I saw it in person, because he would have had to pay a lot moer for it.
So, these commems must be seen to realize just how nice they truely were . I marked each of them in my book to watch.
Rainbow Stars
Your welcome Mr. Guttag
<< <i>This makes me happy
Your welcome Mr. Guttag >>
Haha! No. I have some nice commemorative toners that I've picked up for pennies on the dollar in comparison to these prices.
How about $11,500.00 for the 1939-PDS PCGS MS66 Ark. Set,Lot 8513?
Everybody's got plans--until they get hit
--Mike Tyson
Lafayette Grading Set
Overheard some dealers talking that the coins were 2 points undergraded. That makes some sense.
Congrats to who ever bought them. Never saw an Alabama with colors like that.
yes
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
I'm glad you got to see them MJ. About 10ish years ago I got to see the MS67 Oregon that went for $69,000. My understanding is that it now is a 68. It was a GORGEOUS coin, but still... $69,000? I guess that people that bid like that have a serious chunk of disposable income.
U.S. Type Set
Money flew around that show like it was only paper.
I'd like to nominate this for POTD.
I knew it would happen.
<< <i>i agree with Mr. commeman. these coins listed just do not come nicley toned. The pictures in the catalog and on the computer do not do justice to them.
For example I was bidding on a coin in the pre auction, it sold on the floor to Bob Campell ,which at the time I did not know. When I got to the show I saw the coin
in a case at his table. I informed him that I was the under bidder from the internet and that if I saw the coin in person I would havew bid much higher as it was a
wonderful looking coin. He won the coin for $2000 one bid over mine on the net. Bob told me he was prepared to go to $4000 for the coin as he felt it was really neat
and those this is why he quoted me $4600 for the coin, Passed but boy I wish I saw it in person, because he would have had to pay a lot moer for it.
So, these commems must be seen to realize just how nice they truely were . I marked each of them in my book to watch. >>
If someone now pays 4600 for that coin they are brain dead. Had you not run it that far it may have sold for 1500 or less. I am sure it is a nice coin but not a 4600 coin.
BTW the 3 in the OP are nice, but the price seems steep. I am not that big a gambler.
NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!
RIP "BEAR"
1924 Huguenot-Walloon Tercentenary. MS-67 $29,900
1935-D Arkansas Centennial. MS-67 $15,525
Wow pretty coins but crazy prices...
1918 Lincoln-Illinois Centennial. MS-65 $8,625
1925 Fort Vancouver Centennial. MS-65+ $6,900
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>Laura was the buyer/agent for most of these coins including the Ark set. I'm taking for granted these were for a client. MJ >>
Unfortunately couldn't attend but was told they were "spectacular", and my friend uses that word to describe a coin very infrequently. It was mentioned about the buyer being buried in these coins. I say nay nay, there will ALWAYS be a buyer for this kind of material.
<< <i>
<< <i>Laura was the buyer/agent for most of these coins including the Ark set. I'm taking for granted these were for a client. MJ >>
Unfortunately couldn't attend but was told they were "spectacular", and my friend uses that word to describe a coin very infrequently. It was mentioned about the buyer being buried in these coins. I say nay nay, there will ALWAYS be a buyer for this kind of material. >>
This segment of the market is hotly contested especially on fresh material. By no means was Legend the only major entity that was bidding on these. Other industry commem heavyweights were active as well winning key lots. I was fortunate enough to have chatted with a few other commem guys at ANA about the Guttag lots. The opinion was that some of the key lots may have been under graded. Regardless of the grades on the slabs------- the coins speak for themselves. Congrat's to the new owners of these fabulous coins. MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Unless it is part of the design that I am unaware of...the 2nd guy in the Hugo Obverse....does he have a bunch of gashes in his forehead? Is that acceptable for a 67 or 68?
For the Alabama, I see a good bit of chatter in the face and fields on the obverse. Is that good for a 67?
The Missouri has little marks everywhere on the obverse and reverse it seems. Is that normal for a 66 or 67?
The Rhode Island has a hit in the middle of the obverse and reverse but at least it is tied as finest graded for Pop Top.
They are nice coins for their grades I think but I just can't see them as being 2 points under-graded is all.
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
<< <i>PCGS also spoke for the coins at lower grades than these prices would/should support. At least 2 of these coins were graded recently since they have a +. As someone mentioned...thinking these are a full 2 points under graded...that would be pretty shocking. I guess not unheard of but very very shocking. Also a big gamble...but for those that have money growing on trees, what's the big deal I guess?
Unless it is part of the design that I am unaware of...the 2nd guy in the Hugo Obverse....does he have a bunch of gashes in his forehead? Is that acceptable for a 67 or 68?
For the Alabama, I see a good bit of chatter in the face and fields on the obverse. Is that good for a 67?
The Missouri has little marks everywhere on the obverse and reverse it seems. Is that normal for a 66 or 67?
The Rhode Island has a hit in the middle of the obverse and reverse but at least it is tied as finest graded for Pop Top.
They are nice coins for their grades I think but I just can't see them as being 2 points under-graded is all. >>
You are right Keyman. No way these coins are undergraded. Everyone goes gaga over the color. It should not even factor into the grade. They are nice coins that appear correctly graded. The market can determine value as it has done. remember, eye appeal is subjective.
<< <i>
For the Hugo 43 are graded higher with hundreds in the same grade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the Alabama 2x2 there are 88 graded higher and hundreds in the same grade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the Missouri there are 277 graded higher!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is INSANE!
A FOOL AND HIS MONEY..... >>
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
And that tiny patch of 1/8" inch vibrant green color by "in God we trust" might be 30%-50% of the coin's value. It's the only place on the obv where it stands out.
At least the 'Bama has toning over about half of its surfaces. I noted these were not stickered. Will these prices help convince the coin doctors to shift
more resources into toner commens knowing they can still fetch huge money without the extra review? Or will the sniffaleopagus foil these attempts?
Will toner commems be the next market to finally faulter where in the past prices never saw a retreat? I've seen it happen systematically for gem type coins,
then rarities, then moderns, then better date gold, then better date seated material in both circ and unc, and now toner Morgans. It seems one by one each market
sector is having to deal with the reality of prices that have never fallen before, starting to weaken. Of course the top of top pops will probably continue to distance themselves.
But we're talking only the top 1, 2 or 3 coins for a date, type, etc. After that, the REG set fever to own the very best falls off. The very best Alabama or Hugo in the world will
no doubt always have a home, just like the Mona Lisa. But there's no guarantee for 2nd, 3rd, or even 4th place. And if you're paying 20X bid, best to be 100% sure you just bought
the single finest #1 coin.
Vibrant luster and amazing color on commems have always compensated for minute marks. Any commem can have clean surfaces and be dullish. Very few have blasty luster
and monster color. Marks at that point, like on a toner Morgan are just bit players.
roadrunner
Even if they do not go up in grade, those were some of the neatest colored commems ever.
Why do people knock coins they have not seen?
<< <i>People! I saw the coins. The images are not accurate.
Even if they do not go up in grade, those were some of the neatest colored commems ever.
Why do people knock coins they have not seen? >>
Correct. TomB's post earlier in the thread summed it up nicely.
And oh, color me confused. Legend did not buy the Ark set. Now I'm curious on who did..........MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>Nice looking coins, but at those prices... WOW!!!
I'm glad you got to see them MJ. About 10ish years ago I got to see the MS67 Oregon that went for $69,000. My understanding is that it now is a 68. It was a GORGEOUS coin, but still... $69,000? I guess that people that bid like that have a serious chunk of disposable income. >>
That 67 Oregon you speak of now resides in a PCGS 68+ holder.............MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Anyway, viva la difference we are all entitled to our opinions...
Well, just Love coins, period.
in every way. The main question is this, how does one place a value on such coins.
10X, 20X, 40X or 100X. What is the limit to such madness in bidding? On a subsequent
sale, can the coin retrieve its purchase price? Only a very few individuals can afford to
play at such stratospheric altitudes. Why are some magnificent Commems priced at 40X
while other different, but equally beautiful, commems go for 12X or less? Some beautiful
Commems, but not quite equal to the eye boggling commems go for 1/12 to 2 or 3X. Many
times the differences are fairly narrow, who decides that this is the one and not the other?
Camelot
<< <i>That 67 Oregon you speak of now resides in a PCGS 68+ holder.............MJ >>
So, unless it's a better date, that means it's now "only" about 17x PCGS price guide,
which itself is usually "optimistic"...
Disclaimer: I'm not saying the coin is overvalued. As others have noted, when one
steps up big time for a common coin with uncommon color, it's a much bigger gamble
than buying known rarity.
Anyone else notice this?
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
Camelot
It makes me think about what a comparable 67 Hugo would go for???
<< <i>It makes me think about what a comparable 67 Hugo would go for??? >>
Not necessarily all that much more, as the price paid for these coins reflects the color
more so than the grade.
I turned down a similar Huguenot PCGS66 at $ 6500 a few years ago and would still feel it was overpriced.
Any forum member who thinks these are reasonable market prices for color coins should grab their checkbook and meet me at my bank Monday morning
Commems and Early Type
<< <i>
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
My eariler comment was on the 2k coin now being 4600. i do not see it and Chrisrx pic comes to mind.
NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!
RIP "BEAR"
<< <i>Overheard some dealers talking that the coins were 2 points undergraded. That makes some sense. >>
This kind of talk is always heard before auctions where fresh material hits the blocks. It then often becomes a contest to see who can bid the coin's the highest.
It's a win-win with everyone puffing out their chests for the next few days or weeks as they brag to their buddies on how good they did....until the grades
come back from the TPG's....then the stark realization often hits that they weren't as incredible as first thought. I remember when the NGC fatty "Silbermunzen"
seated halves were auctioned a few years ago. Dealers were competing to see who could take the biggest risk as to the highest grade possible. It was like this
bidding on raw coins at auction in 1988-89. When the grades came back from Silbermunzen there were a lot of disappointed folks I'm sure as no-brainer upgrades
became no-brainer losses.
Before every auction there will be dealers counting their eggs before they are hatched. Upgrades always seem more likely before you see the coin in your own light
or out of the holder in the bright lights at the TPG. I bet RYK is happy that he doesn't have to pay 20X to 40X for his dirty old gold.
roadrunner