<< <i>Does anyone know if proof sets have a lower error percentage than business strikes? >>
Yes, by far! I have many Franklin bus. strike errors in my collection but not a single proof error. I'd like to see a Franklin proof error if anyone has one to post.
I can't post any pictures of Franklin half dollar errors, but I do have this picture of a Sacagawea dollar that was in a Proof set the mint sent to me years ago. This is the worst mint fresh Proof coin I have ever seen. The hole in her face is a large lamination which results when bubble of air gets into the metal alloy that allows a portion of the planchet to fall out of the piece.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>Does anyone know if proof sets have a lower error percentage than business strikes? >>
Yes, by far! I have many Franklin bus. strike errors in my collection but not a single proof error. I'd like to see a Franklin proof error if anyone has one to post. >>
I have a proof Franklin with a minor rim clip, which I bought from someone on the boards, if I can find a picture I'll add it to the thread.
Sean Reynolds
Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
Yes, proof set errrors are far far scarcer than business strike coins but mint set errors are far scarcer than regular business strikes. Proof set errors are much scarcer than mint set errors.
I suppose this might muddy the water a little though.
<< <i>Does anyone know if proof sets have a lower error percentage than business strikes? >>
Yes, by far! I have many Franklin bus. strike errors in my collection but not a single proof error. I'd like to see a Franklin proof error if anyone has one to post. >>
I have a proof Franklin with a minor rim clip, which I bought from someone on the boards, if I can find a picture I'll add it to the thread.
I have a Sac in a 2003 silver proof set that has a fairly large struck in rim burr. I tried to sell it on the boards a few years ago with no interest. I tried to show it to Fred Wienburg at FUN 2-3 years ago and he brushed me off like lint on his lapel. I put it on eBay once with something like $100 opening bid and it didn't sell.
The problem with unique errors like this is that no one cares. They aren't common enough to promote. Now put a die crack on a proof in an interesting place and make thousands of them and you have something. They are much more common but you can give them a catchy name and promote them and make big bucks.
<< <i>I have a Sac in a 2003 silver proof set that has a fairly large struck in rim burr. I tried to sell it on the boards a few years ago with no interest. I tried to show it to Fred Wienburg at FUN 2-3 years ago and he brushed me off like lint on his lapel. I put it on eBay once with something like $100 opening bid and it didn't sell.
The problem with unique errors like this is that no one cares. They aren't common enough to promote. Now put a die crack on a proof in an interesting place and make thousands of them and you have something. They are much more common but you can give them a catchy name and promote them and make big bucks. >>
That's a very minor non mechanical error and that's all you normally see on proof.
There is thin interest in such types of errors but I have seen them sell for upwards of $150 in my web travels.
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
Comments
<< <i>Does anyone know if proof sets have a lower error percentage than business strikes? >>
Yes proof errors escape extremely far less then business strikes as each is examined by a mint employee.
<< <i>Does anyone know if proof sets have a lower error percentage than business strikes? >>
Yes, by far! I have many Franklin bus. strike errors in my collection but not a single proof error. I'd like to see a Franklin proof error if anyone has one to post.
Franklin-Lover's Forum
Here is a one-of-a-kind rolled in wire on a proof state quarter, the only one ................
<< <i>
<< <i>Does anyone know if proof sets have a lower error percentage than business strikes? >>
Yes, by far! I have many Franklin bus. strike errors in my collection but not a single proof error. I'd like to see a Franklin proof error if anyone has one to post. >>
I have a proof Franklin with a minor rim clip, which I bought from someone on the boards, if I can find a picture I'll add it to the thread.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
The name is LEE!
I have a proof 1984-S cent missing the copper plating !
regular business strikes. Proof set errors are much scarcer than mint set errors.
I suppose this might muddy the water a little though.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Does anyone know if proof sets have a lower error percentage than business strikes? >>
Yes, by far! I have many Franklin bus. strike errors in my collection but not a single proof error. I'd like to see a Franklin proof error if anyone has one to post. >>
I have a proof Franklin with a minor rim clip, which I bought from someone on the boards, if I can find a picture I'll add it to the thread.
Sean Reynolds >>
If you ever decide to sell it PLEASE let me know!
Franklin-Lover's Forum
The problem with unique errors like this is that no one cares. They aren't common enough to promote. Now put a die crack on a proof in an interesting place and make thousands of them and you have something. They are much more common but you can give them a catchy name and promote them and make big bucks.
<< <i>I have a Sac in a 2003 silver proof set that has a fairly large struck in rim burr. I tried to sell it on the boards a few years ago with no interest. I tried to show it to Fred Wienburg at FUN 2-3 years ago and he brushed me off like lint on his lapel. I put it on eBay once with something like $100 opening bid and it didn't sell.
The problem with unique errors like this is that no one cares. They aren't common enough to promote. Now put a die crack on a proof in an interesting place and make thousands of them and you have something. They are much more common but you can give them a catchy name and promote them and make big bucks. >>
That's a very minor non mechanical error and that's all you normally see on proof.
There is thin interest in such types of errors but I have seen them sell for upwards of $150 in my web travels.
<< <i>Errors on proof coins are extremely rare and highly collectable. Many of those collectors post in these forums
Here is a one-of-a-kind rolled in wire on a proof state quarter, the only one ................