Options
Significant problem with my grading submission!
RYK
Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
1. The turnaround was faster than indicated on the website (currently 19 days for regular)
2. 5/8 NGC crossovers (the other 3 crossed at one grade down--all 3 CAC'ed BTW
)
My order is going to screw up their stats.
2. 5/8 NGC crossovers (the other 3 crossed at one grade down--all 3 CAC'ed BTW
)My order is going to screw up their stats.
0
Comments
EAC 6024
<< <i>Time to put CAC to the test on the three that down graded. >>
NGC had their opinion, PCGS had their opinion and CAC had their opinion... what's to be tested?
EAC 6024
<< <i>Shouldnt they now get gold stickers? >>
Not necessarily. A coin can be solid for more than one grade. They will be extra solid for the new grade.
EAC 6024
<< <i>Shouldnt they now get gold stickers? >>
If coin grading was qualitative... yes, but it's not. What if the NGC slab hid a rim ding? What if the NGC slab was opaque from scratches? Too many variables.
<< <i>
<< <i>Shouldnt they now get gold stickers? >>
Not necessarily. A coin can be solid for more than one grade. They will be extra solid for the new grade.
Are any of the new grades PCGS AU58 CAC?
I like this; it's my new motto
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i> A coin can be solid for more than one grade. They will be extra solid for the new grade
I like this; it's my new motto >>
call me a party pooper - I don't like it at all -
Cac can't say the coins are solid for the grade and then say their solid for the next grade down too ...........
that's ridiculous .
of course a beaned coin would get re beaned in a lower graded holder , and yes, it would be xtra-XTRA solid for the lower grade then......... wouldn't it
.....you guy's are messin' with my mind
<< <i>Don't worry, the USPS could still lose it.
That wasn't very nice, Tom.
Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner.
<< <i> A coin can be solid for more than one grade. They will be extra solid for the new grade
I like this; it's my new motto >>
Keep on thinking that.
<< <i>Don't worry, the USPS could still lose it.
Don't jinx it
<< <i>
<< <i>Shouldnt they now get gold stickers? >>
If coin grading was qualitative... yes, but it's not. What if the NGC slab hid a rim ding? What if the NGC slab was opaque from scratches? Too many variables. >>
I wonder what percentage of NGC holdered coins have rim issues. I'd guess it is very low.
<< <i>
<< <i>Don't worry, the USPS could still lose it.
That wasn't very nice, Tom.
Tom and I have some history together which gives credence to his remark.
Franklin-Lover's Forum
I own a certain NGC coin that has failed to cross 4X over 9 yrs. It is CAC'd and 1 of only 4 for the entire type to make MS67. Of those 4 coins PCGS and NGC each have 2. That represents about about 1/3 of the PCGS pops and <10% of the NGC pops. Even though the coin is one of the top 4 pieces for type regardless of holder, it doesn't help its "crossability."
roadrunner
Vely interesting.
I knew it would happen.
Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
Sounds like you deserved a brown bean @ AU58, green bean @AU55 and gold bean @ AU53.