Home U.S. Coin Forum

1861-O

Now I have both!

image

Comments

  • richardshipprichardshipp Posts: 5,647 ✭✭✭
    Sweet!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks really nice for a cleaned NCS based on your slab shot... Would like to see the whole coin.

    Can you post some large obv/rev pics of the $20 image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • mrearlygoldmrearlygold Posts: 17,858 ✭✭✭
    image


    Here's my latest 61-O

    image

    image

    Anybody else for 3 of a kind?image
  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623
    Amazing coin Will, a center piece to just about anybody collection.
  • GoldenEyeNumismaticsGoldenEyeNumismatics Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Looks really nice for a cleaned NCS based on your slab shot... Would like to see the whole coin.

    Can you post some large obv/rev pics of the $20 image >>



    As much as I love the coin, I'll be the first to admit that the picture in the OP is flattering of the $20. It's a rather scrubby coin (which still doesn't show too well in these pics).

    image
    image
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>As much as I love the coin, I'll be the first to admit that the picture in the OP is flattering of the $20. It's a rather scrubby coin (which still doesn't show too well in these pics). >>



    It's attractive as far as cleaned goes as I've seen far more horrific looking scrubbed gold in NCS's holders.

    I think NGC will toss this in a Details Edgeview holder for $5 image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This coin was previously in my collection:

    image
  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭✭✭
    While the 1861-O in the OP is a problem coin, I think the final price was reasonable. The AU58 example in the same auction sold for $75K!
    Congratulations!
  • CircOnlyCircOnly Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭✭
    I don't know much about gold, but that is one sweet looking half.
  • DorkGirlDorkGirl Posts: 9,994 ✭✭✭


    << <i>This coin was previously in my collection:

    image >>



    Who cleaned it?
    Becky
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>This coin was previously in my collection:

    image >>



    Who cleaned it? >>


    No one that I am aware.
  • DorkGirlDorkGirl Posts: 9,994 ✭✭✭
    In your picture it doesn't look cleaned, but it sure does in the other one. Very cool coin any way you look at it though.image
    Becky
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The half is a beautiful coin.

    The double eagle is the sort of coin stories are written about.

    Wow.
  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623
    maybe a stupid question but I assume the half is the CSA but which die pair is it?
  • I actually have no idea... I just know it isn't the valuable one. I don't even think it's a CSA.
  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623
    I believe that there are 3 dies states of the 61-o DE and the preferred one is the one with the re-engraved date. But to be honest I don't think anybody knows for sure which were struck and by whom, the half or the DE.
  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,652 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I believe that there are 3 dies states of the 61-o DE and the preferred one is the one with the re-engraved date. But to be honest I don't think anybody knows for sure which were struck and by whom, the half or the DE. >>



    Randy Wiley wrote this up in the Gobrecht Journal some years ago. Although the die pairs can't be absolutely confirmed, he makes a very good case for which ones belong to which authority (US, State of LA, Confederacy).
  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623


    << <i>

    << <i>I believe that there are 3 dies states of the 61-o DE and the preferred one is the one with the re-engraved date. But to be honest I don't think anybody knows for sure which were struck and by whom, the half or the DE. >>



    Randy Wiley wrote this up in the Gobrecht Journal some years ago. Although the die pairs can't be absolutely confirmed, he makes a very good case for which ones belong to which authority (US, State of LA, Confederacy). >>



    Correct On the Half's there is a prevailing theory about the dies/combos & Die states and 2-3 market accepted CSA die pairs with die crack diagnostics. I don't have a better theory just stating that it is only a theory.

    The 61-o DE is slightly different as there was only one die used and they can tell the chronological age of the striking but the theories fall on what point the Union > State of LA > The CSA- had control of the mint during which strikings. I am not a DE collector but if I recall; There is Die State A: which has the Weak but complete date and that transitions to (Die State B: ) the partially missing weak date (similar to the OP Coin) then there are a few known (Die State C: ) with a crudely recut date to strengthen the 1 & 8. It is widely assumed that the Recut one is The CSA coin or State of LA.
  • SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,592 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fun coins. Congrats! image
  • HoledandCreativeHoledandCreative Posts: 2,877 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great pick-up, GEN!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file