Grade me........comments? 79s

49thStateofMind · June 5, 2011 4:04PM

GoldenEyeNumismatics · June 5, 2011 4:26PM

ouch. 62

morgandollar1878 · June 5, 2011 4:37PM

I agree with 62. Looks like PL possible DMPL on the obverse, but since the reverse does not even look PL PCGS won't label it with a PL or DMPL designation. This is also common for the 70's and early 80's S mints for one side to be PL or DMPL and the other side to be neither.

COALPORTER · June 5, 2011 5:18PM

Maybe a little to much for a 62. I'd Genuine it.

Tdec1000 · June 5, 2011 6:12PM

Why would it gennie? For the bag mark on the cheek? I'd go 61/62!

morgansforever · June 5, 2011 8:57PM

62, flat out DMPL obv, maybe PL rev.
Frost is thick on the obv. I kinda like it, not sure why.

TwoSides2aCoin · June 5, 2011 9:13PM

I think PCGS should grade it and my guess would probably be lower than theirs.

fcloud · June 5, 2011 9:13PM

61 pl

boucharda · June 5, 2011 9:44PM

My initial thought was that that top to bottom biggie was a big time frost break and I was more concerned with the perpendicular line right of the eye that ends at the North/South biggie..

Probably need to see in hand and it they are all frost breaks this DMPL will grade much higher....