Anyone think this coin is anything special??

Options
keets
keets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
Looks nice, what do you think??

Al H.

imageimage

Comments

  • Goldbully
    Goldbully Posts: 18,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Nice coin, even if it is only $22 valued by the PCGS Price Guide. image
  • pontiacinf
    pontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    Options


    << <i>Nice coin, even if it is only $22 valued by the PCGS Price Guide. image >>



    lol dem is fighting words LOL image
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • ModCrewman
    ModCrewman Posts: 4,054 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I'm looking on my phone so can't see real well...is there something going on with "five cents" on the reverse?
  • keets
    keets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    no, just a couple what look like carbon spots, though i do think the reverse is sort of special!!image
  • llafoe
    llafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭
    Options
    R38?

    image
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • AUandAG
    AUandAG Posts: 25,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    DDR? Steps and just above them look doubled.
    Is that so?

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Goldbully
    Goldbully Posts: 18,559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    The 'V' in five is a bit small!!! image
  • TexasNationals
    Options
    Reverse of 38
  • keets
    keets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    image
  • Ahrensdad
    Ahrensdad Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭
    Options
    I'm going with R 38. The stairs look wavy.

    Successful BST Transactions with: WTCG, Ikenefic, Twincam, InternetJunky, bestday, 1twobits, Geoman x4, Blackhawk, Robb, nederveit, mesquite, sinin1, CommemDude, Gerard, sebrown, Guitarwes, Commoncents05, tychojoe, adriana, SeaEagleCoins, ndgoflo, stone, vikingdude, golfer72, kameo, Scotty1418, Tdec1000, Sportsmoderator1 and many others.


    Please visit my website Millcitynumismatics.com
  • stephunter
    stephunter Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭
    Options
    It would be a find of gigantic proportions if it is a 40 rev. of 38 business strike. I think Breen spoke of one, but I'm not sure if it was confirmed.
  • seanq
    seanq Posts: 8,835 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


    << <i>It would be a find of gigantic proportions if it is a 40 rev. of 38 business strike. I think Breen spoke of one, but I'm not sure if it was confirmed. >>



    That's why I'm thinking it might be a proof, which would be a gigantic cherrypick.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • keets
    keets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    i can say with reasonable certainty that it ain't no Proof.image
  • llafoe
    llafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭
    Options


    << <i>i can say with reasonable certainty that it ain't no Proof.image >>



    But can you say with reasonable certainty that it's a Reverse of 1938? image
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • keets
    keets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    well, pictures don't lie.
  • mingot
    mingot Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭
    Options
    I noticed this the second I saw it. All I have to say is whoa....
  • mingot
    mingot Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭
    Options
    If this is yours congrats man. Just wow.
  • Type2
    Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


    << <i>Looks nice, what do you think??

    Al H.

    imageimage >>

    Very nice are you going to send it in to have it put on the holder?


    Hoard the keys.
  • Rampage
    Rampage Posts: 9,686 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    So, what is he worth? Speak so those Jefferson virgins out there can understand you. image




  • Monstavet
    Monstavet Posts: 1,235 ✭✭
    Options
    My only comment is that it is already in PCGS plastic, and fairly new plastic at that. Are you suggesting that PCGS missed this?
    Send Email or PM for free veterinary advice.
  • mingot
    mingot Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭
    Options


    << <i>My only comment is that it is already in PCGS plastic, and fairly new plastic at that. Are you suggesting that PCGS missed this? >>



    Would they even be looking for it, though?
  • llafoe
    llafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭
    Options


    << <i>

    << <i>My only comment is that it is already in PCGS plastic, and fairly new plastic at that. Are you suggesting that PCGS missed this? >>



    Would they even be looking for it, though? >>



    I doubt the graders would have looked for this variation... how long do they have per coin to GRADE? 3-4 seconds?
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • PCcoins
    PCcoins Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭
    Options
    I like it! I would definitely give 5c for it. image
    "It is what it is."
  • Monstavet
    Monstavet Posts: 1,235 ✭✭
    Options
    A BS 1940 rev 38 is RARE, so I guess they could miss it.

    I hope it is real, I hope it is Keets coin, and I hope he got it for $22. Suckalicious if all true.
    Send Email or PM for free veterinary advice.
  • leothelyon
    leothelyon Posts: 8,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    If the reverse is not that of a 1938-P or 1939-P Reverse of 1938 working die, one has to question where the Reverse of 1938 working die came from that would have needed to be paired with the Obverse of 1940, that would have stuck how many coins? and we're looking at the first 71 years later???

    This also could fall under the problems associated with distinguishing the business strikes from the SMS coins of 1965 to 1967 and the circulating coins of 2005 to 2010 from the SF satin finish mint set coins. This coin would have came from the proof dies because, where are the rest? There would have been multiples strikes from the pairing of those proof dies which raises that familiar question, did they extend the use of the proof dies to help produce the business strikes for 1938, 1939 and perhaps for 1940 as well? but not for just one coin. Which doesn't make any sense, since they needed several working die sets for the business strikes.

    Another problem that arises, how did it survive in such pristine condition without some help? Which raises another question of it's illegitimacy if it indeed found legs and walked out of the mint. But that suggestion also raises another question but I'll leave it at that.

    I would have to say it's a labeling error.


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • pontiacinf
    pontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    Options
    I am in no way connected to this thread image
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • leothelyon
    leothelyon Posts: 8,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Just looking at the steps, why are they so perfectly struck, on the one side anyway, especially under the 3rd pillar? Proofs were struck twice, correct? And they look more R40 than R38.


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • leothelyon
    leothelyon Posts: 8,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    This reminds me of a coin I found years ago that I thought had some major significant meaning. At that time every so often I would take a few coins to Mike Fahey when he was with ANACS. I remember how shocked I was when he graded my coin a Proof 58. The 1958 coin did start looking like a circulated proof after that instead of the 6 full stepper I thought I had.

    I was a lot younger and optimistic in those days. imageimage


    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • NewParadigm
    Options
    small v?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file