Home U.S. Coin Forum

My coin was dipped.....What do I do now??

Well I bought this coin for my collection a year ago on Heritage.
When I went to the safe-deposit box Friday to get some coins
for reholder, I noticed that one of my coins now has white spots all
over the coin. I have not looked at the coin in some time but I know that
it didn't have the spots when I bought the coin!!

What do I do now??

Coin in question 1970 No-S PCGS PR68 Cameo
image
image
Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set

Comments

  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623
    grade review and have PCGS dip it again
  • llafoellafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭
    PCGS will do a Spot Review. They will review the coin, "conserve" it, reslab the coin; if it grades PR67CAM or lower, they will offer compensation. The cost is shipping there and back; no other fees.
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • What's the dip of choice to address something like this on a clad dime? Do I have to be particular, or would any popular brand do?
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    By all means, submit it to PCGS for grade review.

    Had it been a common dime no biggie but this No S isn't common by any means.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!


  • << <i>grade review and have PCGS dip it again >>



    Why in the world would I want it dipped again!!
    There is no reason this coin should have ever been dipped in the first place.
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set


  • << <i>By all means, submit it to PCGS for grade review.

    Had it been a common dime no biggie but this No S isn't common by any means. >>



    That is the whole reason I am so upset!! This ain't no $50 coin!!
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,894 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>grade review and have PCGS dip it again >>



    Why in the world would I want it dipped again!!
    There is no reason this coin should have ever been dipped in the first place. >>

    You don't know why it might have been dipped or that it should never have been dipped.

    Consider the work that PCGS does to save it "conservation". Then forget about it.
    Lance.
  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,389 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Send it to PCGS for a spot review as others have noted above.

    I have had the same issue in the past and PCGS is very fair to work with. In the end, they treated me so well I have over 95% of my coins in PCGS slabs. They stand behind their product.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,963 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>grade review and have PCGS dip it again >>



    Why in the world would I want it dipped again!!
    There is no reason this coin should have ever been dipped in the first place. >>



    I would prefer dipping this coin to leaving the potentially more damaging spots on it. PCGS has an excellent guarantee- let them solve the problem for you.
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • llafoellafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭
    In the case of many modern coins, they were "rinsed" at the Mint and not "dipped" by a collector/dealer. I'd rather have PCGS "conserve" my coins than have the spots grow on my coins.
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • Let pcgs fix it. As it stands now your coin has a cancer that ain't going to go away and will get worse.
    Nothing to think about, just do it.
    successful BST deals with Meltdown, Broadstruck, lordmarcovan, MisterTicToc, JINX86, BXBOY143, MBCOINS and others
  • toyz4geotoyz4geo Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Answer: All the above.

    I have an 1938-D Buffalo MS67 (Obviously not in the same class as your no P dime) that had grown a real ugly white splotch on it and it was conserved by PCGS at no cost to me. They will stand behind it!

    George
  • Just curious whats that coin worth nowadays?
    Positive:
    BST Transactions: DonnyJf, MrOrganic, Justanothercoinaddict, Fivecents, Slq, Jdimmick,
    Robb, Tee135, Ibzman350, Mercfan, Outhaul, Erickso1, Cugamongacoins, Indiananationals, Wayne Herndon

    Negative BST Transactions:
  • Tdec1000Tdec1000 Posts: 3,852 ✭✭✭
    There is not much else you can do besides that. It probably wasn't dipped but rinsed at the US mint prior to striking. If the coin was dipped by a dealer or seller it might have been because the coin had a stain or some other problem.

    Just a tought....I would send it to PCGS under GRADE GUARANTEE or SPOT REVIEW.
    Awarded the coveted "You Suck" Award on 22 Oct 2010 for finding a 1942/1 D Dime in silver, and on 7 Feb 2011 Cherrypicking a 1914 MPL Cent on Ebay!

    Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
  • TennesseeDaveTennesseeDave Posts: 4,809 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Doesn't look like a cameo at all.Are you sure it was designated as a cameo?
    Trade $'s
  • I doubt that coin was ever dipped. Looks like just natural spotting... similar to what is seen on PCGS silver eagles.
  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,515 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, not to beat a dead horse, but as others have stated, send it to PCGS for spot review. They are top notch and will definitely take care of your problem.


  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,515 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And, I agree, the coin does not look CAMEO at all. Maybe it is just your images. But, if it is designated as a CAMEO, I would send it in for both, spot review and designation review.


  • llafoellafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭


    << <i>And, I agree, the coin does not look CAMEO at all. Maybe it is just your images. But, if it is designated as a CAMEO, I would send it in for both, spot review and designation review. >>



    Maybe the milk spots ARE the Cameo? image It may be the lighting... it looks like there's frosting in the hair above the ear, etc. The lighting may be bleaching the contrast between mirrors and frosting?
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • derrybderryb Posts: 37,732 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Chances are it was never dipped. Also, the newly formed spots cannot be "dipped" off. PCGS compensation is your only recourse.

    No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left



  • << <i>Chances are it was never dipped. Also, the newly formed spots cannot be "dipped" off. PCGS compensation is your only recourse. >>



    Okay so how do spot just form after the coin was minted 30 years ago.
    Last year no spots and this year spots??? I am sorry but I still think it was dipped!!
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set
  • crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623


    << <i>

    << <i>Chances are it was never dipped. Also, the newly formed spots cannot be "dipped" off. PCGS compensation is your only recourse. >>



    Okay so how do spot just form after the coin was minted 30 years ago.
    Last year no spots and this year spots??? I am sorry but I still think it was dipped!! >>



    I agree with you and a lot of valuable coins a freshened "Just cause" before being submitted with the hope of a higher grade.


  • << <i>Doesn't look like a cameo at all.Are you sure it was designated as a cameo? >>



    Here is the pictures of the slab from Heritage? No the best cameo coin!!
    imageimage
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set
  • MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭
    1. Condensation!

    2. Slabs are potential moisture traps.

    3. SDBs are high humidity environments which are not designed for optimal metals storage.

    4. Only the "sniffer" could tell the Source of the Spot. image


  • << <i>Just curious whats that coin worth nowadays? >>



    PCGS says $1200 but really they go between $900 and $1100 in auction.
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set
  • derrybderryb Posts: 37,732 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The "milk spot" issue is a common problem with modern US Mint silver. It especially appears on silver eagles removed right from a fresh mint tube. If the spotting was due to dipping after coins left the mint it would not be so common on coins that are known not to have been post-mint dipped such as the silver eagles coming out of mint tubes for the first time. It is not just a US Mint problem; Canadian silver maples have even more spotting problems. For some unknown reason the spotting does not surface immediately. I'm very surprised that your coin took 30 years to develop spotting and the fact that it occurred on a proof is more surprising. Maybe the fact that it is a proof has something to do with long delay in surfacing.

    No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left



  • << <i>1. Condensation!

    2. Slabs are potential moisture traps.

    3. SDBs are high humidity environments which are not designed for optimal metals storage.

    4. Only the "sniffer" could tell the Source of the Spot. image >>



    I have had 4 safe deposit boxes for 3 years with over 150 slabbed Roosevelt in them and this is the only coin to develop spots!!
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set
  • MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>1. Condensation!

    2. Slabs are potential moisture traps.

    3. SDBs are high humidity environments which are not designed for optimal metals storage.

    4. Only the "sniffer" could tell the Source of the Spot. image >>



    I have had 4 safe deposit boxes for 3 years with over 150 slabbed Roosevelt in them and this is the only coin to develop spots!! >>




    Well, let PCGS investigate via Heritage, and take care of it. Maybe the consignor is one of the infamous 'coin doctors'.


  • << <i>The "milk spot" issue is a common problem with modern US Mint silver. It especially appears on silver eagles removed right from a fresh mint tube. If the spotting was due to dipping after coins left the mint it would not be so common on coins that are known not to have been post-mint dipped such as the silver eagles coming out of mint tubes for the first time. It is not just a US Mint problem; Canadian silver maples have even more spotting problems. For some unknown reason the spotting does not surface immediately. I'm very surprised that your coin took 30 years to develop spotting and the fact that it occurred on a proof is more surprising. Maybe the fact that it is a proof has something to do with long delay in surfacing. >>



    In you thread you keep referring to silver. The 1970 Proof Roosevelt are .750 copper, .250 nickel.......no silver so does your statement still hold any weight to clad coins.
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set
  • Okay one more question......Don't I have to be a member at PCGS to submit it for spot review?
    Jaime image ~Proof Roosevelt Hoarder~ My Roosevelt Set
  • llafoellafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭


    << <i>Okay one more question......Don't I have to be a member at PCGS to submit it for spot review? >>



    If you're not a member, another member or an authorized dealer can submit the coin for you.
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • llafoellafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭
    Your coin sold on 2/3/10 for $805 at Heritage. The Heritage photos clearly show that it's not a cameo. If you send it in for grade review or spot review, it's certain PCGS will downgrade your coin to a minimum of PR68, if not lower. PCGS Value for a PR68 is $1150 and PR68CAM is $1200. Not much of a difference. If they remove the spots (if they're from a bad dip and aren't milk spots), and downgrade it to PR68, don't expect more than $35-40 compensation from PCGS. If they are milk spots, they may not be able to "conserve" this coin. If it drops to a PR67, you'd probably only see a check for $100-$120.

    Edited to add: PCGS may see this as a mechanical error. It's obvious it's not a cameo.
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards
  • ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,043 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't think I'd go so far as to say that it's definately not a cameo. The cameo's of the 50-70 era have become a new pursuit of mine of late, and having looked at a lot of Heritage auctions, it's not hard to find DCAM coins where the cameo hardly shows up in their photos...they really seem to be hit and miss on capturing the cameo.

    IMHO when you look at the close-ups you can see that the devices aren't smooth, and do indeed have the frost there. I'd guess it's got more cameo there than the pictures would lead us to believe.


  • << <i>

    << <i>Okay one more question......Don't I have to be a member at PCGS to submit it for spot review? >>



    If you're not a member, another member or an authorized dealer can submit the coin for you. >>


    You can submit coins for spot review without being a member. If you don't have a submission form you can contact customer service and ask them to mail it to you. You have to pay the shipping both ways plus the $8 handling fee. If PCGS can't remove the spots and the coin downgrades, they will contact you in regards to their buyback offer.
  • llafoellafoe Posts: 7,220 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Okay one more question......Don't I have to be a member at PCGS to submit it for spot review? >>



    If you're not a member, another member or an authorized dealer can submit the coin for you. >>


    You can submit coins for spot review without being a member. If you don't have a submission form you can contact customer service and ask them to mail it to you. You have to pay the shipping both ways plus the $8 handling fee. If PCGS can't remove the spots and the coin downgrades, they will contact you in regards to their buyback offer. >>



    When I spoke with them today, they said they waive the $8 handling fee.
    WANTED: Cincinnati Reds TEAM Cards


  • << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Okay one more question......Don't I have to be a member at PCGS to submit it for spot review? >>



    If you're not a member, another member or an authorized dealer can submit the coin for you. >>


    You can submit coins for spot review without being a member. If you don't have a submission form you can contact customer service and ask them to mail it to you. You have to pay the shipping both ways plus the $8 handling fee. If PCGS can't remove the spots and the coin downgrades, they will contact you in regards to their buyback offer. >>



    When I spoke with them today, they said they waive the $8 handling fee. >>


    That may be the case then. I know in the past, on any free service there was no handling fee. Recently they began charging the handling fee for collector club grading vouchers and quarterly specials.
  • sinin1sinin1 Posts: 7,500
    what makes you think it was dipped?


    to me it looks like it was artificially frosted and that has gone bad - rather than dip residue
  • GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭
    Call them and get the ball rolling. 800-447-8848

    When it's over be sure to update the thread.

    Good luck with it.

    image

    Ed
  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,409 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>grade review and have PCGS dip it again >>



    Why in the world would I want it dipped again!!
    There is no reason this coin should have ever been dipped in the first place. >>



    What causes you to believe that it has already been dipped at least once?
    theknowitalltroll;
  • FrankcoinsFrankcoins Posts: 4,572 ✭✭✭
    Certain types of "haze" on proofs can evaporate and reform as spots inside a slab due to temperature changes. PCGS can dip it off and it
    will be gone. Ironically, had the coin been dipped BEFORE encapsulation, there would likely never have been a problem

    Frank Provasek - PCGS Authorized Dealer, Life Member ANA, Member TNA. www.frankcoins.com
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with Frank. You assume it was dipped, but if so, the spots would likely have appeared long before now. Each coin is different though and only sending it to PCGS can come close to establishing the root issue. Good luck, Cheers, RickO
  • ajmanajman Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭
    Hi Schatzy, if you look at this photo of your coin I believe you can see some evidence of spotting. It's small but you can see it in several places. So it appears to me that it was there when slabbed and has grown since then. I agree with the others to have it sent in for a review. Good luck in whatever you decide what to do.
    Beer is Proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy -Benjamin Franklin-

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file