I like the colors a lot. These tend to toned nicely. This may get whacked for the hits on hull of the first ship on the reverse and below Raleighs eye and collar/shoulder area......Very attractive coin. 65ish? MJ
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>How is the luster under that toning? If it's above average, I'll go 66. Otherwise, looks like a nice 65.
65 is what imediately came to mind. >>
In hand the coin has ~average luster but the color really pops when you till the coin, sadly that is very hard to capture in photos(for me). I am happy most people are leaning towards 66 from the photos as the coin looks much better in hand.
TomB nailed my thoughts. My first impression was I like the toning but luster looks muted. I realize luster is not always easy to capture in photos. In any event, nice pick-up -- thanks for sharing.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
65...overall pretty clean but there is a nice hit on the cheek below the eye and on the eyebrow on the obverse, with several on the skirt and ships on the reverse. I like the toning and it is a nice coin!
Yours looks like MS62. A lot of hits, but looks very nice.
Here is mine. Your reminds me a lot of mine. Its a PCGS MS66: No noticeable hits. There are 2 hairlines that can be seen when tiltign the coin accross Raleigh's nose. If this is a MS66 the coin in the OP is not close to a MS66.
I'll guess the average of the first 10 grades, dropping off the highest and lowest grades, and to make Llafoe happy, I will state that I am very confident that my guess will be correct.
It's an attractive coin with a few hits on the obverse (more on the reverse dress and ship), and it's tough to see luster bands (although that depends on the lighting in the photo). Attractive, original toning like that could bump it to a 65+ (or low-end 66 on a good day, since the obverse hits are less obvious due to the toning), IMO.
64 at best. if the coin posted above is a 66 the OP coin is at least 2 grades lower. Probably a 63. I have given up trying to predict what grades Commems get though since it seems to be the most inconsistently graded series of all. Strike is pretty much ignored and it seems color bumps the grades way up when it should have no effect at all. Both are nice coins though.
Looks nice to me except for the patchiness of the toning around Raleigh's face. I'm not always a big fan of tab toning, personally. I like symmetry. This coin is definitely not bad looking, though, even to me.
Comments
Edit: the hit on the cheek might drop it a grade. As has been discussed commem grading is inconsistent.
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
65 is what imediately came to mind.
<< <i>How is the luster under that toning? If it's above average, I'll go 66. Otherwise, looks like a nice 65.
65 is what imediately came to mind. >>
In hand the coin has ~average luster but the color really pops when you till the coin, sadly that is very hard to capture in photos(for me). I am happy most people are leaning towards 66 from the photos as the coin looks much better in hand.
<< <i>How is the luster under that toning? If it's above average, I'll go 66. Otherwise, looks like a nice 65.
65 is what immediately came to mind. >>
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
Let me know if you want to sell.
TRUTH
K
<< <i>I see rim dings, AU58 for me. >>
You do?
Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
<< <i>I would grade it "How Much?" >>
As in how much did I pay or how much do I want for it?
Here is mine. Your reminds me a lot of mine. Its a PCGS MS66: No noticeable hits. There are 2 hairlines that can be seen when tiltign the coin accross Raleigh's nose. If this is a MS66 the coin in the OP is not close to a MS66.
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left
It's an attractive coin with a few hits on the obverse (more on the reverse dress and ship), and it's tough to see luster bands (although that depends on the lighting in the photo). Attractive, original toning like that could bump it to a 65+ (or low-end 66 on a good day, since the obverse hits are less obvious due to the toning), IMO.
I'll go MS-64 and hope I'm low. Beautiful coin.
Ron
Edited to add: The Roanoke, like the Elgin and Columbia, the skirt is the first place to show hits.
Based on the images presented, I put it in the 64/5 range.
Now the one that jmj3esq posted- THAT one I love.