Weird clash, or something else on this Morgan? Help!

Comments

• Options

  cheezhed Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 23, 2010 9:53AM

  I have one like that.

  Many happy BST transactions

  0
• Options

  coinkid855 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭

  September 23, 2010 9:55AM

  Oh? What year is yours?
  
  
  
  -Paul
  
  Edited to add: This one's an 87-P

  NGC 2.1 Census! PM me yours!

  0
• Options

  CoinCrazyPA Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭✭

  September 23, 2010 11:40AM

  There is some clashing also under viewers right wing,

  Positive BST transactions: agentjim007, cohodk, CharlieC, Chrischampeon, DRG, 3 x delistamps, djdilliodon, gmherps13, jmski52, Meltdown, Mesquite, 2 x nibanny, themaster, 2 x segoja, Timbuk3, ve3rules, jom, Blackhawk, hchcoin, Relaxn, pitboss, blu62vette, Jfoot13, Jinx86, jfoot13,Ronb
  
  Successful Trades: Swampboy,

  0
• Options

  Wolf359 Posts: 7,666 ✭✭✭

  September 23, 2010 11:54AM

  
  I doubt it.

  Multi-channel listings of coins and inventory management
  
  Free Trial
  

  0
• Options

  crazyhounddog Posts: 14,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 23, 2010 11:59AM

  Looks like a tiny die crack...

  The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.

  0
• Options

  pheh Posts: 1,588 ✭

  September 23, 2010 12:01PM

  IF it were a clash it would be a partial E from LIBERTY. VAM-1B Hot 50. But that shadow does not look like it should for the partial E.

  0
• Options

  messydesk Posts: 20,790 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 23, 2010 12:08PM

  I've seen that before. Small die gouge/scratch. Can't remember the VAM off the top of my head, but I think this scratch is secondary to something else. How's the obverse look?

  John
  Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution

  0
• Options

  johnny9434 Posts: 33,155 ✭✭✭✭✭

  September 24, 2010 4:09AM

  i dont remember ever seeing one like that. theres always a first

  0
• Options

  guitarwes Posts: 9,308 ✭✭✭

  September 24, 2010 6:25AM

  
  1889 or 1899, can't remember, but the cotton boll clashes give it away. Don't think what's under the tailfeathers is important.
  
  
  

  @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
  Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.

  0
• Options

  coinkid855 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭

  September 24, 2010 6:28AM

  
  
  << <i>I've seen that before. Small die gouge/scratch. Can't remember the VAM off the top of my head, but I think this scratch is secondary to something else. How's the obverse look? >>
  
  
  
  
  Someone on VAMworld said VAM 18. It's an 1887 btw.
  
  
  
  -Paul

  NGC 2.1 Census! PM me yours!

  0