Home U.S. Coin Forum

My new Boston NEWPS: TONED 1909-S VDB and 1877 - which ones to keep?

ThePennyLadyThePennyLady Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭✭✭
I wasn't looking to change out my 1909-S vdb, but I just couldn't pass up this beauty. I love my current one with its pretty colorful toning, but this new one has such beautiful color and eye appeal on both sides. I know it has slight remnants of a fingerprint on the reverse, but that doesn't bother me because the look and toning is so beautiful and the fingerprint seems to have toned with the coin. Ok, forgetting what the grades and holders say and just looking at the coins themselves, what are your thoughts?

Here's my NEW 1909-S vdb....

image

and here's my OLD 1909-S vdb....

image
Charmy Harker
The Penny Lady®
«1

Comments

  • MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭

    Charmy,

    It was great seeing you again at the Boston ANA - and I did look over your
    cases of goodies - I even sent a YN over to buy his first 1909-VDB - he came back
    to show it to me - and he was thrilled. Thanks for helping him.

    I didn't see your newp for your personal set - VERY nice !! Congratulations.

    [That's the last date I need to complete my old Penny Set that I started in
    High School... 45 years ago...
    image ]

    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like your newp it's very pretty and the print to me isn't as bothersome as flecks or a spot imageimage
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • ThePennyLadyThePennyLady Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Charmy,

    It was great seeing you again at the Boston ANA - and I did look over your
    cases of goodies - I even sent a YN over to buy his first 1909-VDB - he came back
    to show it to me - and he was thrilled. Thanks for helping him.

    I didn't see your newp for your personal set - VERY nice !! Congratulations.

    [That's the last date I need to complete my old Penny Set that I started in
    High School... 45 years ago...
    image ] >>



    It was wonderful seeing you again too, and thank you for sending that young man over. He was so nice and very careful when he chose the 1909 vdb - he seemed to know just what he wanted, which is great to see in a young collector.

    And you're not alone in having the svdb be the last coin you need to complete your Lincoln collection! So next time you're at my table, perhaps you'll have to do some browsing of your own!
    Charmy Harker
    The Penny Lady®
  • loro1rojoloro1rojo Posts: 266 ✭✭✭
    Wow.. amazing coins! Although your old coin was beautiful, your new purchase is even better.
    -Gabe
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,852 ✭✭✭
    I like that one Charmy. That is one beautiful Lincoln. image


    Mike
  • nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    So...I get up in the morning, stretch my old aching back, turn on the computer, and look at a beautiful coin. Life is good!

    Thanks, Penny Lady.image
    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • YogiBerraFanYogiBerraFan Posts: 2,390 ✭✭
    Those colors really seem to compliment the coin. I usually don't like too much toning on copper.
  • zap1111zap1111 Posts: 1,298 ✭✭
    It's a very nice coin - I have no problem with the print, either. However, I like the 64 better. That coin has a unique look to it. Gorgeous! Thanks for sharing.
    zap1111
    102 capped bust half dollars - 100 die marriages
    BHNC #198
  • garrynotgarrynot Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
    Beautiful coins as usual. Thanks for sharing.
  • pmacpmac Posts: 3,189 ✭✭✭
    Charmy, it was really nice meeting you at both the ANA and Trader Joe's. I like you NEWP with its blazing colors (the 77 wasn't bad either). Gee, I wonder who took the wonderful photos? Also, are fingerprints a basic provenance?
    Paul
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Really nice.
    I definitely like the newer one better. image

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    WOW!! Charmy, those are both very nice, the 65 gets the eye appeal vote from me....Very nice color finger print and all....
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Even with all that pretty toning, that is a lot of red for the RB designation! I really like it.
  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,960 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I never would have thought CAC, copper and fingerprint would have went together, Hmmm. Live 'n learn eh?
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,448 ✭✭✭✭✭
    nice pick up lady image
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Really nice.
    I definitely like the newer one better. image >>

    Ah, man, I have no choice, other than to agree with Ron.image
  • SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,540 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sweet looking '09-S VDB!
  • ThePennyLadyThePennyLady Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Really nice.
    I definitely like the newer one better. image >>

    Ah, man, I have no choice, other than to agree with Ron.image >>



    Thanks everyone, and thank you Mark - again! It was great to finally meet you in person in Boston, and I really appreciated your thoughts on my two 1877's as well. I still go back and forth a little, but I agree with you and think I'm going to keep my "old" 1877.

    Anyone else care to chime in on my choice of 1877's - again, please try to ignore the holders/sticker!?

    Here's my current one (which is also in my signature line)....

    image

    and here's the new one I bought in Boston....

    image
    Charmy Harker
    The Penny Lady®
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I really don't have a much of an understanding of the
    color designations used
    especially with toned copper coins

    I enjoy your posts.
    LCoopie = Les
  • ThePennyLadyThePennyLady Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I dont see a print, are you referring to the area just above VDB?

    I like it!! >>



    It's in the middle of the reverse, but more evident underneath UNITED STATES OF AMERICA where you see the vertical yellowish lines.
    Charmy Harker
    The Penny Lady®
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Really nice.
    I definitely like the newer one better. image >>

    Ah, man, I have no choice, other than to agree with Ron.image >>



    Thanks everyone, and thank you Mark - again! It was great to finally meet you in person in Boston, and I really appreciated your thoughts on my two 1877's as well. I still go back and forth a little, but I agree with you and think I'm going to keep my "old" 1877.

    Anyone else care to chime in on my choice of 1877's - again, please try to ignore the holders/sticker!?

    Here's my current one (which is also in my signature line)....

    image

    and here's the new one I bought in Boston....

    image >>

    Charmy, it was good to be able to visit with you, too. Even if I had to pay Todd to shoot images for meimage

    If you don't KNOW that you much prefer the new 1877, to your current one (and it doesn't sound as if you are even close to that), why not just keep and enjoy yours? It might be different if you were talking about keeping duplicates of two $50 coins.image
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>I dont see a print, are you referring to the area just above VDB?

    I like it!! >>



    It's in the middle of the reverse, but more evident underneath UNITED STATES OF AMERICA where you see the vertical yellowish lines. >>



    I thought that was toning! That would not bother me one bit >>

    That's actually a very good example of a print that has become part of the toning. And obviously, not all prints are created equally.image
  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Easy option, sell all the coins and the have Mark search the floors at upcoming shows for silver coins in G6 or blast white DMPL's image

    If that fails I would keep both the NEWPS.
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the obverse of your "old" '77 with the reverse of your "new" one!
    I guess if I had to choose only one, though, I'd keep the NGC64rb. Always admired that coin in your sigline.
    Nice photos!

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,657 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Charmy.

    Lovely coins as always.

    From the pictures you posted in this thread I like your current 1909S VBD and 1877 better than the two new purchases. If I saw these four coins in hand I might change my mind.

    If you can locate and acquire a nice raw toned 1912 P Lincoln and bring it to the November Santa Clara show you will have a buyerimage Hope to see you there.

  • Wow! I like the upgrade, Charmy!
    BGG
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,467 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Charmy.

    Lovely coins as always.

    From the pictures you posted in this thread I like your current 1909S VBD and 1877 better than the two new purchases. If I saw these four coins in hand I might change my mind.

    >>



    I agree, based on the photos posted, I like both of your current examples better than the new purchases.
  • The 64 VDB has more detail than the new 65. Both have nice color. So I prefer the NGC 64.

    The lettering on the obverse of the "new" Indian appears shallower than the lettering on
    the "old" one. But that may be an optical illusion due to the toning. I have other coins
    with that kind of toning and the lettering on my coins also appears shallower than that
    on untoned (or cleaned) examples.

    On the other hand, the "new" Indian has more detail in all the feathers except the first,
    it doesn't have the mark on the last feather, and it has more detail in the hair over and
    in front of the ear. In a 65 (and generally), I'd personally be looking for the sharper strike.
    Both have gorgeous color so I don't make any distinction between them on that aspect.

    Hope to see you at a show soon! Oh, you'll be at Fremont? Cool!

    Mark
    The Secret Of Success Law:
    Discover all unpredictable errors before they occur.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    Great upgrade! I, also, much prefer the new coin. Congrats & thanks for sharing!
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    p.s. as for the 1877's I prefer the old coin, but frankly, don't really like either one as much as the new 1909-s vdb.
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • MesquiteMesquite Posts: 4,075 ✭✭✭
    Wonderful!!image
    There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.
    –John Adams, 1826
  • droopyddroopyd Posts: 5,381 ✭✭✭
    While both of your newps are gorgeous coins, your current examples seem to fit better within the "look" that you've been collecting.

    Without seeing your entire collection, or knowing of your interest in having a "matched set," I guess there's no reason you can't hang onto the old as well as the new.
    Me at the Springfield coin show:
    image
    60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
  • ThePennyLadyThePennyLady Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks everyone for all of your comments - unfortunately, they is no clear concensus. Here are some of my observations: I look at and judge the coin for itself and try to ignore what holder it's in or what grade has been assigned. I love the toning on my old svdb but the obverse doesn't have the color that the reverse does, and the new svdb is colorfully toned on both sides, even though the reverse has a little more color. The fingerprint does not bother me especially since it toned nicely with the coin and didn't turn black. The strike on both are comparable, and neither has any unsightly spots.

    On the 1877, I absolutely love the toning on my old one. The strike is very good for an 1877, and the only flaw is the mark on the last feather - there are no spots or problems with this beauty. The obverse toning is so deep and rich, with amazing deep blue magenta toning. And even though the reverse isn't toned, it doesn't bother me as much as it would had the obverse and reverse been swtiched like the svdb. As most would agree, if a coin could only have toning on one side, for me it definitely needs to be on the obverse. The new 1877 has absolutely gorgeous toning, much prettier than even in Todd's wonderful photos, with the reverse being even more colorful. And it's full of blooming luster. There are a couple very tiny spots that bother me a little. I'd much rather have a ding than a spot. There is tiny dark speck above the date and a few very light "toning" specks in front of the nose and above the second feather and on the ear. Also, there is a very faint lighter area between the E and S in STATES that is hard to see in the photo which could be a minor planchet alloy discoloration. Again, the strikes are pretty even with both coins so that's not a factor.

    In any event, I'm leaning towards the new svdb, but as Mark suggested, I do submit to the philosophy that if you can't decide between something, staus quo is usually the best way to go, so I'm probably going to keep my old 1877.
    Charmy Harker
    The Penny Lady®
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lincolns:
    You danced with the old guy long enough.
    Go home with the new one.

    Indians:
    The old guy is still the right guy.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,072 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Simply amazing 09-S VDB....love the color on it! (your "old" one wasn't so bad either)
  • HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
    I prefer the new 1909-S vdb and the old 1877

    or the first coin pictured in both cases but they're all nice.
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,556 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Really nice.
    I definitely like the newer one better. image >>

    Ah, man, I have no choice, other than to agree with Ron.image >>



    Mark, that isn't even a choice. You MUST agree with me. No choice on the matter image

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well I'm a bit late with my opinion, but I dont really care for the new 09-VDB and much perfer your old/current coin. Both have things going for them but I like the strike of the old coin better. Same with the IHC
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,431 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the old VDB.The "S" position is more intriguing.Besides,the new VDB has a spot at the tip of the first nine which is little distracting.
    Also,the old one seems to be a better strike.

    Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.

  • I like the newer versions of both dates, especially the new VDB!
  • AuroraBorealisAuroraBorealis Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭✭✭
    New one for sure... Just gorgeous... image

    ABimage
  • AuroraBorealisAuroraBorealis Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Oh i see the 2 Injuns now... It`s pretty well a toss up if not looking at the slabs and stickers...The new 77 looks to have a much smoother toning especially in the obverse field and into the face a characteristic that i personally like but your present 77 looks quite a bit brighter with a better reverse...Tough one all depends on what you find more appealing... image

    ABimage
  • MonstavetMonstavet Posts: 1,235 ✭✭
    I prefer the 64RB in the lincoln and I like your new 77. But I don't see how you go wrong with any of them! Wonderful stuff!
    Send Email or PM for free veterinary advice.
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,467 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i> There are a couple very tiny spots that bother me a little. I'd much rather have a ding than a spot. >>



    That's what I was thinking when I said above that I prefer your current "old" examples of each coin. Like a couple have mentioned, the "new" 1909-S VDB has a tiny spot right near the tip of the first 9 in the date which draws some attention. Moreover, I just like the color of the "old" example much better, the "new" one is just too splotchy/streaky and I personally find it much less eye appealing. Of course, that's based just on the photos provided. For the 1877, I really like your "old" example and it's hard to have any negative comments about it. However, the first thing I noticed about your "new" 1877 is the bright spot just of the tip of Liberty's nose and also the tiny dark spot just above the date. Sure, that's being pretty picky, but those issues just happen to be in inconvenient places. Finally, like others have mentioned, it's a tough decision and being such a tough choice it's likely much easier to stick with the status quo. Good luck and congrats on having these cool coins.
  • anoldgoatanoldgoat Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭
    I like the old oneimage
    Alright! Who removed the cork from my lunch?

    W.C. Fields
  • pmacpmac Posts: 3,189 ✭✭✭
    I think that you can't go wrong with any of your choices, they are beautiful examples of rare and sought after coins.
    Paul
  • richardshipprichardshipp Posts: 5,647 ✭✭✭
    Likely no wrong decision any way you go.

    For me I like the old '09 and the newer '77 but that's just me.
  • I prefer the 64 lincoln because it seems to have less contact marks and I like the color on it, adds character in a good way to the piece.

    I also prefer your older indian, the new one has a carbon spot on the obverse and I just like the over all look of the older one better.

    You got winners either way!
  • pmacpmac Posts: 3,189 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I prefer the 64 lincoln because it seems to have less contact marks and I like the color on it, adds character in a good way to the piece.

    I also prefer your older indian, the new one has a carbon spot on the obverse and I just like the over all look of the older one better.

    You got winners either way! >>


    This caught me by surprise. Why's he talking about a 1964 Lincoln? A great car, but wrong forum. "Duh" on my part.
    Paul

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file