Grade Opinions on this 1973 D Ike

Comments

• Gandyjai Posts: 1,380 ✭✭

  May 2, 2010 11:34AM

  MS64
  JMHO,
  Brian

  0
• Rampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 2, 2010 11:37AM

  I agree with Brian. No way a 66. 64 tops.

  0
• Constantine Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭

  May 2, 2010 11:40AM

  Too many marks especially on Ike's face. 64 and possibly 65. In my opinion no way higher.

  0
• Rampage Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 2, 2010 11:42AM

  
  
  << <i>Too many marks especially on Ike's face. 64 and possibly 65. In my opinion no way higher. >>
  
  
  
  I don't really see it as a 5, but I have not submitted IKEs in a number of years now. I really think the nasty scrape on the chin limits it to a 4.
  
  
  
  

  0
• coinkat Posts: 23,881 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 2, 2010 11:46AM

  The 1973-D has high expectations in 66- and this example, form the image falls short of those expectations. It is attractive-nice lustre, good looking fields and it would appear on the best day it is a 65.
  
  Now, perhaps it looks better in hand...

  Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  0
• GRANDAM Posts: 8,774 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 2, 2010 11:47AM

  MS64.275 as per the new grading scale

  GrandAm

  0
• erwindoc Posts: 5,289 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 2, 2010 12:25PM

  Thanks for the opinions! That is why I asked. It does look a little better in hand, but if I am getting a little over MS64 as a consensus then it will stay in the dansco. Perhaps I should stick with Roosevelts!

  0
• keets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 3, 2010 12:26AM

  1973 P&D Eisenhower Dollars come especially nice due to the fact that they weren't released into circulation, a fact which is taken into consideration when they're graded. they typically have very strong luster and cleaner fields but also fall victim to the easily seen unstruck planchet flaws this coin shows. on the flip side, 1971/1972 P&D Eisenhower Dollars were released into circulation only, so that is also considered when grading.
  
  BTW, MS64 shot 65.
  
  

  0