question on the '2' on a 21-S WLH

ad4400 · April 25, 2010 2:41AM

Does the '2' in the date look okay here? Seems a bit fat on tap and lacks the curve at the base. Assuming the date looks okay, would you guys agree this is a nice look F coin.

rld14 · April 25, 2010 2:50AM

That could go VF20 and to me it looks genuine

MFH · April 25, 2010 3:36AM

What RLD14 said.

I like it - its at least "genuine"... which
is more than I can say about the 21-D
in another Thread.

Nice looking 21-S, IMHO

savoyspecial · April 25, 2010 3:43AM

genuine all day long......the top of the numeral only looks 'fat' because with wear it is blending into the exurgal line

rld14 · April 25, 2010 3:55AM

I ought to clarify, when I said it was Genuine I meant it was real, not that it would come back in a Genuine slab

IMO it's a very nice and original coin with a look that I like.

supertooth · April 25, 2010 8:23AM

Date looks OK to me. This coin is definitely a liner IMHO. On a good day, it gets a VF20. Otherwise a really nice Fine15. Bob [supertooth]

Walkerguy21D · April 25, 2010 10:00AM

As usual, I concur with Supertooth

RebelRon · April 25, 2010 10:40AM

I go with VF.Those early Walkers are less sharply struck.

question on the '2' on a 21-S WLH

Comments

Leave a Comment