Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Need a little help from the Morgan pros

gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
Do you think this is worth the submission fees?..Thank's.
image
image

Comments

  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,556 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i> >>




    Ummmmm......ok.........


    ??????????????

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • JJMJJM Posts: 8,089 ✭✭✭✭✭
    65 ++
    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly, justindan
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ah...now that there is a picture image
    ....

    Looks like a scan. Is there luster? If luster, and no marks hiding, it could go MS66 (but, grading from a picture is no science, as we all know).
    Also depends if there are marks hidden by the shot or not. If it really is that clean, and is full of luster, it should be good to go.

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin looks to have a satin finish.No marks to speak of.
  • RedTigerRedTiger Posts: 5,608 ✭
    If that is how the coin really looks, flat with no real luster, I vote no. If that is a scan, and the live coin has superb cartwheel luster then maybe. I suggest you have someone with experience submitting Morgans such as a dealer or another collector look at it in hand and get a grade opinion that way. At MS65 and above it would be worth it. Below that no.

    Satin finish? Morgans don't generally come with satin white finish, so that is puzzling to me.

    Investment blog: gold, stocks and more
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice lustre and cartwheel -- YES.
    Subdued lustre -- NO.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice coin, at least from the scan.
    Only you know how clean the cheek is, appears to be nearly mark free.
    Make sure it's not the 1887/6, whole different coin if it is.
    I'll say 65 based on the scan, who knows perhaps a 6 on a good day.
    Or just keep it raw it's a Gem, slab or no slabimage
    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    The scan look pretty much mark free in all the right areas, how does it look in hand?

    When I first saw it I instantly thought counterfiet. Then my second thought was scan not photo.

    Does the coin cartwheel?

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • gsaguygsaguy Posts: 2,425 ✭
    Looks AU to me.
    image
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Based on the images provided, the coin is either a lackluster, fairly low grade unc. or AU. Either way, it would not be worth submitting.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,338 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Can't judge based on picture from a flatbed scanner, since scanners don't show luster at all.
    John
    Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
  • kurtdogkurtdog Posts: 1,456
    Going off the scans, I'll agree, it's at least a 65. If you do send it in, I'll say, 50% chance it's a 65, 25% chance, each, it's either better or worse.
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    So, thus far, we have established that the coin probably grades between Au and MS66. In other words, the images are essentially worthless - sorry.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What I see on the reverse rim at K3 bothers me. I think this one sat for a long time in the dipping bottle.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • gsaguygsaguy Posts: 2,425 ✭
    They're not totally worthless, I'll say AU+ with CAC bean.image
    image
  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thank's for the replies .Yes I know it's hard to go by a flatbed scanner.And me not knowing much about MD.
    I have four free submissions and will add this to the package.
  • gsaguygsaguy Posts: 2,425 ✭


    << <i>Thank's for the replies .Yes I know it's hard to go by a flatbed scanner.And me not knowing much about MD.
    I have four free submissions and will add this to the package. >>



    thumbsup: Please do let us know the results.
    image
  • kurtdogkurtdog Posts: 1,456


    << <i>So, thus far, we have established that the coin probably grades between Au and MS66. In other words, the images are essentially worthless - sorry. >>


    Yes, LOL, we really nailed this one! image
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would not even try with those images. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...