Home U.S. Coin Forum

Remember this Trade Dollar?

AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just to refresh your memory I purchased this from China (I know better, no throwing stones) based on excellent pictures and
a seller with no feedback problems (100% positive) with the hopes that it was original and not a fake. Well, when I received
the coin it went on the scale and to the calipers. Underweight and oversized. Underweight by just a fraction but underweight
for sure. Certainly not within US mint tolerances.
Well, off to a friend, CaptHenway (Tom). He wanted the opportunity to view the coin in hand and I was more than happy to oblige.
He opted to have a 3rd party, PCGS, make the determination. Questionable Authenticity was the result.
Yes, I had said it was a fake and PCGS and Tom confirmed it. So, be aware, there are some that can fool and some fools that
will come to the party. Oh, I did get my money back and the seller did not get the coin back. It's being taken out of the collecting
world forever!
Now, for you non Trade Dollar experts, like me, study the pics. Look at the CC's (right on), look at the verdigris on the reverse (right on).
Some here pegged it right off, wheat sheaves are incomplete (I thought that it was due to a huge chop on the other side) and other small
tells. But, study, learn, buy and return! It's all part of the hobby and we all learn from our mistakes and will continue to make more,
just smaller I hope!
bob
imageimage
imageimage
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com

Comments

  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for sharing the official results about the authenticity of this Trade Dollar. I think I remember the original thread and may have commented that I did not recognize some of the chop marks that were placed onto this coin. They may have very well existed back then, but some of them just did not look right for the era.

    Good luck.
    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • AnkurJAnkurJ Posts: 11,370 ✭✭✭✭
    Sorry to hear, but good thing you got your money back!
    All coins kept in bank vaults.
    PCGS Registries
    Box of 20
    SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    I don't collect Trade Dollars, but I have to admit that the chop marks would cause me to believe the coin authentic even though I also know Trade Dollars are commonly faked.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!


  • << <i>I don't collect Trade Dollars, but I have to admit that the chop marks would cause me to believe the coin authentic even though I also know Trade Dollars are commonly faked. >>



    image
    imageimageimage
  • DUIGUYDUIGUY Posts: 7,252 ✭✭✭
    I gotta say the denticles would be the first red flag. What shocks me is the attempt to hide a fake with chopmarks.image
    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."



    - Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 9,494 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, it has bad denticles. This counterfeit is not all that convincing.
    The picture showing the coin in the measuring calipers really makes it look fake,
    more so than the other pictures.
  • HyperionHyperion Posts: 7,444 ✭✭✭
    hmph, and I thought the weight wouldn't be that close on a fake (tho Im reading now that most recent fakes are way closer to accurate weight)


    I just picked up a trade dollar from a trusted source in portugal and it's 27.1 now Im suspicious, I gotta make sure to see the size and post a pic image
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree that the coin looks way more suspicious in the photos with the caliper and the scale: the rims and the devices look malformed.
    In the first set of photos, what caught my eye were the rims (too narrow mostly, too wide in a spot) and the pupil in the eagle's eye just looks like a round dot-- it should be more of a crescent shape. I can't tell if I'm seeing a gap where the feather's at the back of the bird's neck meet the left "shoulder," if there is a gap that would be incorrect for a type 2 reverse.

    Oh-- and thanks for posting the outcome on this one--
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Interesting. If I saw that in hand, I would have rejected it, but the fakes are certainly improving. Cheers, RickO
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How about this one, any observations?

    image
    image
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,992 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>How about this one, any observations?

    image
    image >>



    What is the weight Kaz? Diameter? First thing first!
    bob

    PS: mine was a bit thin as well as oversized. I forget to put that in the original thread.
    bob
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭✭✭
    wt= 27.10g; I don't have a decent caliper. coin has some damage to dentils around 7:00
  • TennesseeDaveTennesseeDave Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I vote fake on the 74-CC Kaz!
    Trade $'s
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Once you've seen enough real chopmarked trade dollars, you won't be fooled by those fakes. The fakes tend to be small and lightly marked and well spaced out when there's lots of them. That's not how they did them back in the days.
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>How about this one, any observations?

    image
    image >>




    Yes, it's a fake. I bought it when I first started collecting Trade Dollars from a seller who always had a ready supply of "lightly chopmarked" examples. They were fairly decent replicas, the first one fooled me for a long time but by the time I bought the second one I had learned how to spot fakes. Got my money back and left warning feedback for others, which didn't stop him. Finally, repeated negs and threats of legal action from other buyers got him to stop. I suspect he had a source for these in China, because they all had a certain "look" to them and the chops were often strange looking.
    I agree with TDN's comments-- be suspicious if the "chops" are light, small, or scattered in areas that don't impact the design too much.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file